- 1,391
- Chicago
- Silberc
- Silberc
You don't have to boycott competely, just buy NFS The Run used.
I don't buy NFS titles but I did give Shift 1 a go and thought it was pretty cool for what it was. I might still pick Shift1 and 2 later, used. EA won't see a penny if you buy used. Sadly if there's an online component to the game, unless you buy new you'd fork over something like $10 to get access to the online. Better than the full $60 new in my book!
I will be getting BF3 and FIFA12 most likely on day 1 but EVERYTHING ELSE I will pass on unless I can buy it used or very cheap. Boycotting won't work much because there's just vastly more gamers out there that don't blog
Thats called stealing.
Hey, I completely agree with you. But, there are still some folks here who will now "boycott" any EA title. Personally, I find it a tad bit silly to say, "I'm not going to buy Battlefield 3 or Mass Effect 3 because EA wouldn't let T10 have Porsche."You wouldn't need to boycott those games anyway. All that needs to happen is that the EA games that make use of the porsche license have poor sales, then it's no longer financially feasible to spend all that cash on exclusive contracts when you gain nothing in return.
Boycotting EA doesn't really make sense for me partly because none of their recent racing games (10 yrs give or take) have been worth buying anyway IMO. Battlefield is a different story, but as I said, boycotting that game will have no impact on the racing genre whatsoever, unless people are expecting EA to go bankrupt overnight forcing them to sell all their assets from the top down.
The boycott those, perhaps? It's still somewhat silly imo, to boycott just any EA game when half of them have nothing to do with sports or racing.It's bigger than just the Porsche issue for some of us. Fans of the NFL or Pro Evolution Soccer will attest to that.
That's called "pot luck". Personally I don't think it's stealing at all. Gamestop should ask the guys returning if they've used the codes or not. When I purchase used I shouldn't have to "hope" that a code is good or not.
That's the point of the code, to reduce buying games used.
You shouldnt have to hope, because you shouldnt be expecting to use the code.
No that's like buying a 6-speed sports car and demanding they install the 4-6 gears you find out are missing after you get it on the road and only have 4.That's like buying an old used car, going to the dealer and demanding they replace the transmission because the guy you bought it from told you it worked.
I'm fairly sure there's a whole bunch of stuff in the EA TOS that mentions several times that they aren't responsible for missing content in used copies of the game.
And it tells you to read the TOS before you register to play the games.
No that's like buying a 6-speed sports car and demanding they install the 4-6 gears you find out are missing after you get it on the road and only have 4.
Once EA sells the game, according to you, what happens is no longer their problem. So a code in a used case shouldn't be their problem either. I can see if I'm going to Gamestop and breaking open new games trying to get codes but if I'm getting codes in used games, that supposedly EA has no more responsibility for then it's not their concern what happens then. If they want their codes to ONLY be used by the original purchasers then they need to have some self-destruct paper or something. "You've got 1 hour to enter this code or this paper will burst into flames".
No. It's not. Unless you buy the car used. In which case it'd the sellers responsibility, not the manufacturers.
If you bought a car new from the manufacturer and that happened, I'd see you're point, but we're talking used, not bran new.
If you go buy the game from EA, and you don't get access, then you'd have a case, but you're not buying it new directly from the company, you're buying it used from Gamestop, so it's their responsibility. So before you go stealing from EA, maybe you should talk to Gamestop.
Also, on the subject of the boycott, I'm probably not going with that. I doubt enough people are going to boycott their games to make even a slight dent in sales. And even that dent will be patched and then some by people who buy EA racers because they're the only ones with Porsche. That said, I probably won't buy EA racers because most of them are bad. All I'm buying from EA in the foreseeable future is ME3, and BF3.
I'd be willing to bet money that EA's lawyers saw this reaction coming, and figured us getting upset would spread the word for them. EA's advertisers have used peoples anger as an advertising tool for a very long time, and I don't see this as being any different.
I'd rather EA stop this nonsense with the codes thing. I agree with TO, if I buy the game, I should expect to get all the features listed on the box, used or new. That's how it's worked in the past, and I see no difference now. If XBOX players have to pay $60.00 for Xbox Live, and then $40.00 for a used game, they shouldn't have to pay another $10.00 to enjoy it.
I can't wait until EA get gone.
crispychicken49I'd rather EA stop this nonsense with the codes thing. I agree with TO, if I buy the game, I should expect to get all the features listed on the box, used or new. That's how it's worked in the past, and I see no difference now. If XBOX players have to pay $60.00 for Xbox Live, and then $40.00 for a used game, they shouldn't have to pay another $10.00 to enjoy it
Once EA sells the game, according to you, what happens is no longer their problem. So a code in a used case shouldn't be their problem either. I can see if I'm going to Gamestop and breaking open new games trying to get codes but if I'm getting codes in used games, that supposedly EA has no more responsibility for then it's not their concern what happens then. If they want their codes to ONLY be used by the original purchasers then they need to have some self-destruct paper or something. "You've got 1 hour to enter this code or this paper will burst into flames".
I'd rather EA stop this nonsense with the codes thing. I agree with TO, if I buy the game, I should expect to get all the features listed on the box, used or new. That's how it's worked in the past, and I see no difference now. If XBOX players have to pay $60.00 for Xbox Live, and then $40.00 for a used game, they shouldn't have to pay another $10.00 to enjoy it.
I can't wait until EA get gone.
I agree. The cost new should factor-in and cover all the server costs. EA have gone too far with the online pass.
Buy a used car that is satellite radio equipped. The original owner probably got a year free when they bought the car new, but as a second hand owner you are not entitled to the free perk.
The 60 for xbox live is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with ea.
VaxxtxGame companies started the online pass, VIP content, and other little deals to recoupe some of those lost dollars that Gamestop is taking away from them. If anyone should boycott anything it should be buying used games.
Makes one wonder why developers are still giving pre-order bonuses through outlets that also deal in used games. The used market has obviously impacted devs.to the point they are doing access codes and even sony looks to be humping the wagon when resistance 3 is released.
Any who......... Porsche/forza......
We now return you back to the topic at hand.
VaxxtxIts because Gamestop/EBGames has become too big an oulet to ignore. Sadly. Its a nessecery evil basically. Best Buy's are now doing trade ins. Actually doing it much better than Gamestop, for trade in value and in store creds.
The average person buying games doesnt know the impact used games have on the game development/publisher industry. Heck look at the posters above...they have no clue as to why online passes are becoming more popular. And dont tell me a soccer mom knows buying used hurts the dev's. They see a cheaper price and think cool.
Oh yeah, Forza, Porche, Evil EA, Boycotts, etc. etc...
^The cost new does factor that in, that's why the code is in the box when you buy it new.
We were talking about used though.
Anyway, you're accessing EA's online servers. And you only payed Gamestop. That's steeling from EA. And even though the game copy itself isn't EA's problem, people accessing their servers without paying is.
Again, just because Gamestop didn't include what it said on the box, doesn't mean you can just steal from EA.
Does EA need the money to keep it's servers running? Hell no. But does that mean you can just take it for free because they don't need it? Also no.
Just because you bought something without making sure everything was there doesn't mean you can just go taking things that other people had to pay for.
Is EA a bunch of greedy d:censored:s for doing this? Yes, but that doesn't automatically justify stealing things from them when Gamestop is the one selling the game without what was advertised.
I'm sorry guys but you guys aren't making much sense. You sound as if I buy it used and get an unused code in the box off jump street I'm supposed to just throw it away. "Oh , can't used that even though it's a good code. EA may not want me to have that even though the Gamestop employer never told me and left the code in the case. EA has nothing written on the case saying 'In case of buying used please destroy any codes and buy from us'". Sorry man but for me that's not gonna happen.Thats correct. Buying a game new included the CODE. Buying used does NOT entitle you to the same perk. Sooo...yeah. Thats why there is a code...to give people an incentive to buy NEW.
Live has nothing to do with it. When you buy the game NEW you DO get everything with it. Buying it from Gamestop USED doesnt entitle you to everything. Its no longer from EA once its been "traded in" by a customer.
No Porsche and no Positano track. FM3 will retain replay value for that alone.