Post ur enzo quarter mile times here!!

  • Thread starter MRENZO1
  • 86 comments
  • 4,808 views
KaroSVTR
Cmon dude... 8.969 is faster then the pre 2.04 patch. Turn your SRF off then run it. Same for your ACR.
Click to expand...

That's no SRF on the viper... The Enzo was an old run so admittedly yes SRF was probably on..
 
Simple Matt
Yeah that's SRF.. What g's
Click to expand...

I'm at work so I'll have to look when I get home.. It's not SRF... There is about 5 of us with the same tune... We all run between 8.94 and 8.99...
 
jgancherjr
It's 1.3x I'll get the exact number when I get home but it's either 1.36 or 1.39..
Click to expand...

Its definatelly SRF man cause the best is 1.31 for ACR and 1.25 for Enzo!!!
My Enzo with SRF did 8.964 with 1.46Gs!!!If i tested it with Srf when i post 8.996
time would be under 8.9 for sure man.
2012-03-05144044.jpg

Without SRF and same tune time was 9.062,imagine that!!!
And check out how high is the Gs for ACR
2012-03-11160408.jpg
 
Last edited:
kleomenis5582
Its definatelly SRF man cause the best is 1.31 for ACR and 1.25 for Enzo!!!
My Enzo with SRF did 8.957 with 1.47Gs!!!
Click to expand...

Dang it Kleo here goes another argument! Lol :P .. I'm home and I'm gonna run with both right now and try and upload pics of both with the ACR, SRF on and off..
 
jgancherjr
Dang it Kleo here goes another argument! Lol :P .. I'm home and I'm gonna run with both right now and try and upload pics of both with the ACR, SRF on and off..
Click to expand...

Trust me. It has SRF. Do it without SRF, and you should be fine.
 
jgancherjr
Dang it Kleo here goes another argument! Lol :P .. I'm home and I'm gonna run with both right now and try and upload pics of both with the ACR, SRF on and off..
Click to expand...

Its not an argument my friend its a fact and thats why i posted those pics
If you want to be legit to everyone post a video and show before your run that everything is ok!!!
Im not a lawyer and definatelly here is not a court!!!
I told you before that its another thing time and Gs...
Put max ballast behind and the Gs are what you say but time never be close!!!
And something last: Do you want me to argue with you or laugh at you???
Definatelly neither but most of people here will do the second if you insist on your times...
Thats an advice my friend
 
Last edited:
kleomenis5582
Its not an argument my friend its a fact and thats why i posted those pics
If you want to be legit to everyone post a video and show before your run that everything is ok!!!
Im not a lawyer and definatelly here is not a court!!!
I told you before that its another thing time and Gs...
Put max ballast behind and the Gs are what you say but time never be close!!!
And something last: Do you want me to argue with you or laugh at you???
Definatelly neither but most of people here will do the second if you insist on your times...
Thats an advice my friend
Click to expand...

Ok..
 
1.36 g's without SRF 8.965 (today) ...1.62 g's with SRF 8.942 (today)... Believe me or not I'm to the point where I don't care, I've alway been a credible and legit person on GTPlanet and the general GT5 community, I'm not here to argue I'm here for general discussion.. If your not as fast or pulling as many G's but remember, there will always be someone faster then you.. I know theres quite a few that I run into online that are faster then me... If you want to race me though I'm available about this time of day and the preceding 3 hours...
 
I guess 1.36 is is possible without without SRF with a bit of ballast. I never tried it.
 
No man he's running SRF 100% i dont care what he says. The enzo will never do 1.3x without SRF...
 
Mikeybc
I guess 1.36 is is possible without without SRF with a bit of ballast. I never tried it.
Click to expand...

When 100 people of us try to do a Mark time and we see after a long time that this is not possible even for the top,how can it be that a new guy make so more Gs and so much faster time of all of us.
And yes Mickey 1.36 is possible with ballast but time is so much slower man
I have tried more than 200 combinations with that car with or without ballast
with so many different trans and susp setups!!!
2 months ago we had an argument with Retromaniax for the same reason
When someone posted the best time,1 hour later he posted an even faster time
which was impossible to do.Back then the best was 8.998 and someone did
8.997 Retro after 20minutes posted 8.994 and is still the best time and noone
could do it even now!!!From 8.994 to 8.965 imagine what has that to be!!!
And just to be fair with full ballast i hit 1.35 and time was over 9.1
 
I though the discussion turned towards his ACR running 1.36 g's :) almost Impossible for Enzo yes but ACR maybe with a bit of weight added ?? Maybe his gain on launch overcomes his loss on top end from the extra weight, Anyway I'm done speculating.
 
Mikeybc
I though the discussion turned towards his ACR running 1.36 g's :) Impossible for Enzo yes but ACR maybe with a bit of weight added ??
Click to expand...

Yeah but the time regardless will be slower not faster. Maybe his 0-60 will be faster but after that the car will die out
 
KaroSVTR
Yeah but the time regardless will be slower not faster. Maybe his 0-60 will be faster but after that the car will die out
Click to expand...

That's what I always thought too, I just like to keep an open mind on borderline stuff like this sometimes. He needs to post a video to remove any doubt. But that's unlikely :)
 
jgancherjr
1.36 g's without SRF 8.965 (today) ...1.62 g's with SRF 8.942 (today)... Believe me or not I'm to the point where I don't care, I've alway been a credible and legit person on GTPlanet and the general GT5 community, I'm not here to argue I'm here for general discussion.. If your not as fast or pulling as many G's but remember, there will always be someone faster then you.. I know theres quite a few that I run into online that are faster then me... If you want to race me though I'm available about this time of day and the preceding 3 hours...
Click to expand...

Is there any way you can post a video? Show us the settings, like whether SRF is on or off, and then run the car. This is to ensure maximum clarity of your time :)

EDIT- wait a minute...it is apparent that you were running an alleged time of 8.957, with the G's hidden. We all knew that it was flagrant that you were running SRF, but then today you said that you were running 8.965, without a picture and the G's, of course. What is that all about? Care to explain, please.
 
Last edited:
swara96
EDIT- wait a minute...it is apparent that you were running an alleged time of 8.957, with the G's hidden. We all knew that it was flagrant that you were running SRF, but then today you said that you were running 8.965, without a picture and the G's, of course. What is that all about? Care to explain, please.
Click to expand...

514d85ed.jpg


If you look further down, you'll see what he runs without SRF, and the top is the times he runs with it on. Not very hard to spot a force runner these days, and wont make a bit of difference when they run online.

Also like someone I ran into yesterday saying his GT350 ran 9.7s and his GTR ran 8.2s. Apparently a stopwatch is more accurate than Route X? I think not.
 
Build ACR specific for the best time and achieving 1.36Gs.
If someone can do under 9.020 i'll be gladly to see that!!!
But i dont think so cause after 60mph it will slow down to much
 
swara96
Is there any way you can post a video? Show us the settings, like whether SRF is on or off, and then run the car. This is to ensure maximum clarity of your time :)

EDIT- wait a minute...it is apparent that you were running an alleged time of 8.957, with the G's hidden. We all knew that it was flagrant that you were running SRF, but then today you said that you were running 8.965, without a picture and the G's, of course. What is that all about? Care to explain, please.
Click to expand...

I only did a couple passes.. 8.95 was my best.. I run manual with my DFGT so my times are far from consistent, sometimes my car wanders left or right
 
Master__Shake_
If you look further down, you'll see what he runs without SRF, and the top is the times he runs with it on. Not very hard to spot a force runner these days, and wont make a bit of difference when they run online.

Also like someone I ran into yesterday saying his GT350 ran 9.7s and his GTR ran 8.2s. Apparently a stopwatch is more accurate than Route X? I think not.
Click to expand...

Master shake if you look at the dates the slow ones were from a week earlier before this last tune that I dialed in online against a faster friend online then brought to route x to see what I had improved..
 
jgancherjr
Master shake if you look at the dates the slow ones were from a week earlier before this last tune that I dialed in online against a faster friend online then brought to route x to see what I had improved..
Click to expand...

If you look at time #10, it was 1 & 1/2 minutes before your #1 run. Just admit that you used SRF and try harder to tune it; lying just makes you look more like a fool.
 
post only legit non srf times here please, anything else i guarante will not get by these guys. we can clearly tell thats srf because i bet if i got on right now and ran my enzo with srf id hit the same time approximatly and also hit the same g's.
 
kttheman001
post only legit non srf times here please, anything else i guarante will not get by these guys. we can clearly tell thats srf because i bet if i got on right now and ran my enzo with srf id hit the same time approximatly and also hit the same g's.
Click to expand...

probably even beat his time with SRF on.
PS: Ima try to launch it in 1st gear im curious on what time i would get ;)
 

Similar threads

T
drag times for dc2 post
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
dr_slump
dr_slump
P
Clean's 1/4 mile Base tunes
Replies
19
Views
46K
Brabra010
Brabra010
Team THRT Drift
Hennessey Exorcist Camaro Beats Dodge Demon's Quarter Mile
Replies
1
Views
870
McLaren
McLaren
RaymanX
1/4 mile tuning tips
Replies
0
Views
2K
RaymanX
RaymanX
Chuk713
Wrecked 'em Racing GT World Tour
4 5 6
Replies
154
Views
15K
Cold Warrior
Cold Warrior

Latest Posts

Back