I read many times PC2 physics is rather arcadeyYou are right about SMS and PCARS3, but PCARS2 is the current benchmark sim for some, and rightfully so if you ask me. It depends on what you're looking for.
I read many times PC2 physics is rather arcadeyYou are right about SMS and PCARS3, but PCARS2 is the current benchmark sim for some, and rightfully so if you ask me. It depends on what you're looking for.
I read many times PC2 physics is rather arcadeyIt must be pretty hard to build a sim these days because no sim is sim enough apparently.
Exactly, but is it true? I hardly think so because most of the sim racers probably can't judge it. It's very problematic and I started with sims recently again. My last time I played sims was 15 years ago and I didn't care about reality at all. I just played GTR2, RBR or GT Legends and was happyAC
ACC
iRacing
RFactor 2
does are rather universally claimed to be most realistic.
Exactly, but is it true? I hardly think so because most of the sim racers probably can't judge it. It's very problematic and I started with sims recently again. My last time I played sims was 15 years ago and I didn't care about reality at all. I just played GTR2, RBR or GT Legends and was happy
I mean, is PC really like arcade?
Don't believe everything you read.I read many times PC2 physics is rather arcadey![]()
That's always been the case.It must be pretty hard to build a sim these days because no sim is sim enough apparently.
I can point out issues with every one of those and in particular iRacing. In fact, I would rate iRacing as one of the most problematic of those listed, even if you add PC2 onto the list, mainly for it's tyre model and refusal to accept that you can drift a car.AC
ACC
iRacing
RFactor 2
does are rather universally claimed to be most realistic.
With those three titles, you may not have known it, but you certainly did care about reality.Exactly, but is it true? I hardly think so because most of the sim racers probably can't judge it. It's very problematic and I started with sims recently again. My last time I played sims was 15 years ago and I didn't care about reality at all. I just played GTR2, RBR or GT Legends and was happy![]()
I mean, is PC really like arcade?
I can point out issues with every one of those and in particular iRacing. In fact, I would rate iRacing as one of the most problematic of those listed, even if you add PC2 onto the list, mainly for it's tyre model and refusal to accept that you can drift a car.
I don’t disagree, it simply irks me that PC2 gets dismissed too often.Well. It is just. Every sim has some issues.
I liked some words from David Perel who is real GT3 driver. Before ACC he used a lot GT Sport for training. Somebody asked him why?
His response? "It is realistic enough to make training worth it"
So maybe instead of pursuing the MOST REALISTIC sim racing title, we should just enjoy those which suits us best and are realistic enough.
Indeed. At the end of the day we all like our racing games and our passion comes through in all the "discussions" about which is best. Perhaps, as you say, we should spend less time debating and more time playing the titles we enjoy.So maybe instead of pursuing the MOST REALISTIC sim racing title, we should just enjoy those which suits us best and are realistic enough.
I don’t disagree, it simply irks me that PC2 gets dismissed too often.
That said AMS2 should be on that list along with R3E as well.
So maybe instead of pursuing the MOST REALISTIC sim racing title, we should just enjoy those which suits us best and are realistic enough.
Perhaps, as you say, we should spend less time debating and more time playing the titles we enjoy.
Exactly, but is it true? I hardly think so because most of the sim racers probably can't judge it. It's very problematic and I started with sims recently again. My last time I played sims was 15 years ago and I didn't care about reality at all. I just played GTR2, RBR or GT Legends and was happy
I mean, is PC really like arcade?
AMS2 is great and really shows what the Madness engine is capable of, R3E is based on the ISI engine that RFactor1/2 and the first AMS use, and again is great. R3E also uses a different graphics engine,m so looks really good and has the best audio in a sim I've come across as well as some of the best AI around.Yeah i forgot about those. I heard AMS2 is really decent. I hope it will come out on PS5 someday.
Audio often gets overlooked or moved down the list in what is desired in a simulation but it's very important for immersion. It can help gloss over faults in the physics if your ears are being thoroughly entertained. The PCars series has been a little hit and miss in that regard.and has the best audio in a sim I've come across
It's PC only, but R3E is even better than ACC, hard as that may be to believe.Yeah. Audio is very important. IMHO nothing get close in audio terms to ACC. I am just blown away with sounds in this sim.
Yep, you get a few cars and tracks for free, so it's worth a go.What i saw it is free2play (atleast some of the content) and it doesn't have too steep requirements. Maybe my laptop could run it. I should give it a try
I agree those are the best (maybe to soon to put ACC into that group?) but each one has its strengths and weaknesses and some of those weaknesses are shocking. We don't have anything close to a sim that does everything really well yet.AC
ACC
iRacing
RFactor 2
does are rather universally claimed to be most realistic.