That should be great news for all the virtual photographers out there. The Last of US sure does have some pretty views people will be all over.Looks like some sort of sharpening filter on those screens, a tad overdone.
News is a photomode is coming to TLOU remaster via a day 1 patch
The PC crowd have been doing that for ages, so there is a precedent....People spending more money on the smallest graphical upgrade ever...
The PC crowd have been doing that for ages, so there is a precedent.
Not really, if you are buying better hardware to see the same game with more wow to the images, then the money goes to the graphics card manufacturer. The only difference here is ND get some of that profit, as well as Sony. To the end user, the result is the same.There's a difference between upgrading your hardware, and double dipping to get the nearly exact same game.
MeanElf
Upgrading a PC is like buying a new generation console. You do it not just for the graphical upgrade, but also to be able to actually play new games. TLoU came out little more than a year ago. It's utterly ridicules to release a barely changed version that required little to no work at full price. It's greedy.
It's just one of many things ND has done in the past year that clearly indicates a shift from being a brilliant company, to being a greedy one, aimed at milking as much as they possibly can. Like selling dificulty modes as DLC's and releasing the "remastered" version, which is hardly different form the original. If anything, the "remastered" version simply has less compression.
Nope.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/5/16/5723830/last-of-us-ps4-port-hell
The game is also releasing at $50, so not full price.
If they wasted that much time and effort on a product that in the end looks almost identical to the original, then their idiots. And the difference between 50 and 60 dollars is mute as far as I'm concerned. It's still way overpriced, considering the game came out a year ago. Not like ND didn't make a small fortune on it...
Well which is it? Are they lazy or are they idiots? Or are they lazy idiots?
You've played The Last of Us on the PlayStation 3, yes? Could it be possible that you aren't the target for this game? I have many friends who never picked up a PlayStation 3 but they did pick up a PS4 and The Last of Us is one of the games they wish they could've played. Now they can spend $50 (you say the price difference is mute, but you clearly claimed it is full price when it isn't) and get one of the best games of the last generation built for the current generation system. If you don't like it then don't buy it again, I don't see a reason to be upset at all. Clearly Naughty Dog put a lot of work in the remastered version, but I guess they can't win either way. To you they are either lazy or they're idiots. Thankfully to everyone else they are still regarded as one of the best developers in the industry.
video
I know that the PS4 hasn't sold a large number of consoles in Japan presently, due to a number of console gamers either staying with the PS2 or moving onto PC. This release is also aimed at getting those players who have skipped a generation back - and that's a Sony decision......I consider it one of the best games I've ever played. But I'm against "milking" a game by releasing a "remastered" version a year later. Primarily 'cause the time and money could have gone into a new and equally good game. If people want to play the game, they can get themselves a PS3. ND shouldn't, in my opinion, waste time on catering to people who couldn't play it because they didn't own a PS3. Their time would be better spend invested in new products.
Like peobryant suggests though, the release probably wasn't aimed at you and it certainly isn't hurting you in any way. ND have two teams presently and a game doesn't get churned out in just a year anymore, well, not the high-end ones; so you haven't lost out on a new game either...so relax.
And by the way, I'm guessing as you are flying the Danish flag that English isn't your first language. That's no problem, but for future reference the word is 'moot' not mute, stemming from Moot, being an annual gathering of tribe elders who decided things for the community. A moot-point is something taken for granted as accepted.
No worries and I'm glad I was able to help there. I remembered how it was when I was learning Dutch, after a certain point, the occasional pointers went a long way to helping me understand more fully....Cheers. Corrections to my English is more than welcome as long as it is done in a respectful manner. 👍