I'm not sure why you're more concerned about what is good for Sony rather than yourself or other consumers.
It's important that it is profitable for Sony. The more profitable and larger user base they attract, should generally be better for people gaming on their platform. Even though PS4 has been quite successful, there have been casualties for a number of their gaming studios. Disappointing that Evolution Studios was closed down, I'm sure if they were more profitable, they would still be around and that affects me as a consumer. The less successful something is, the less support it has in general. That may also mean less choice, quality and higher costs for consumers.
For example, I have a phone running BB10 which is QNX based, hardly any support by developers but in the automotive world QNX dominates and has so much support. I’m concerned that BlackBerry will stop making phones, their last phone isn’t as high quality and costs a lot more than their competitors' products and they're getting slower at releasing new products. Loss making is not sustainable unless you have a lot of money to burn which likes of Microsoft does have so less of a concern there. I wouldn't be surprised if they have made big losses on each generation, still I see they get labelled as Micro$oft when they're likely given in a lot more than they got out.
Apart from their resale value off course
As
@Samus points out you seem more concerned with what's best for SONY, so you may laugh at the term crusade but when the cap fits......
That's the difference of ownership.
There seems to a crusade against the PS4 Pro from what I’ve seen so far on the Internet. It's not only good for Sony but also for consumers, I wouldn't purchase a PS4 Pro if it offered nothing extra. They're doing a good job of keeping profits up while delivering something competitive early which is not that easy to do when you got competition with the financial strength of Microsoft.
Well, not surprising since he is more concerned about sales rather than what is going on with actual products. Sales really don't mean anything for any consumer, so it's odd to tout it up as a plus for us, in general.
I'm actually more interested in what is going on with actual products, looking forward to the benefits short term and long term. Sales are very important IMO for consumers. I don't game much anyway, hardly used my PS4. Not too concerned by this gen, might get more back into gaming when PS5 releases though.
That must be why they've slowly crept into offering media-based functionality like Vue. You know, the subscription-based TV service that not even Microsoft pushes? The fact of the matter is the Pro lacks a fundamental feature that would further its appeal to the very market it's reaching for; a feature that the lesser Xbox One S offers without any changes to its hardware structure.
Which is really odd and is, again, a flaw: to push 4K and HDR but not offer physical media playback that capitalizes on those features? As for your suggestion of Sony possibly revising the platform next year with such a player is even more nonsensical than not having one in the first place.
That's not their main focus for the console, I only heard of Vue because you just mentioned it and looking at, it's also available on other platforms for a very limited market so I'm not surprised I haven't heard of it before. Streaming is Sony's area of focus regarding media, they made that quite clear. I don’t think that will be important for PS4 Pro success though given most TVs can do much of what PS4 Pro can do. The very market they’re reaching for I believe is people who want an enhanced PlayStation experience. That could be people looking to see improvements in 1080p displays like I think a large number of their target audience may have and also PS VR has rather than only people who want better graphical fidelity on their higher resolution displays. To me a fundamental feature of a gaming console is its ability to play games, not playback of UHD Blu-rays.
A flaw or positive if it means lower cost of entry for consumers and it arrives sooner for gamers? It competes with the 2TB S, 1TB less and lack of UHD drive for the Pro but three times the GPU power. It's interesting seeing the reaction on the Internet being so negative for the Pro and how important suddenly 4K disc playback is given how small the market is at the moment. There’s probably more demand for PlayStation steering wheels. It will be good if suddenly demand for that UHD format has a massive surge in sales, I'm sure Sony will react positively to that. Maybe they could also release an external drive.
Personally think if they were going to include UHD disc player, it wouldn't be until around Spring 2017 they would be able to release it. That's when their first standalone player will come to market. It will be probably first UHD Blu-ray compatible laser by Sony. I think it will be nonsensical to have one in the first place when writing was on wall long before that it’s likely won’t be the case of it having one. I’m grateful they included 1TB, that I think will be more beneficial than say 500GB and UHD drive to their target audience. I do think they will release a revised model, especially if 10nm is viable next year and they get their new drives in manufacture in enough numbers in time, should then have a slimmer Pro with a cut price to go up against Scorpio.