So not in GTP, can you present one exemple where Kaz is ever complained his customers whining in negative way?That's because we don't hear from Kaz period. He doesn't post as GTP, as such its a false comparison to make.
You get a dev that engages, you get the good with the bad.So not in GTP, can you present one exemple where Kaz is ever complained his customers whining in negative way?
I haven't seen a thing like that, that's the smart decision to dodge those, instead SMS has stepped in line of fire on them self, so it's kinda self made problem to face complains directly, again smart company personnel can take negative comments as good comments and improve things what made those comments to rise, without arguing with customer and his rights to be unpleased on product and complain.
Just a quick temporary reply from my phone. Yes I have a folder on my desktop full of evidence that this was willfull abuse. I wouldn't have put in the cases to the authorities I have if I didn't think I could prove so (one with the US dept of justice I'm still waiting to hear back from). So I *should* just see what's on my pc before retracting that statement.
However, I accept that it's probably not what you want on gtplanet. Whether or not it is libel or truth, so may just rephrase it anyway.
...oooh wouldn't that be an awesome story if I were dragged through a court by a company to explain myself about exposing the truth?
Btw such exploitation of consumers is not actually illegal... re: petition to government. So I can't accuse them of an illegal act in that way but there are other areas where civil illegal actions have been taken.
So not in GTP, can you present one exemple where Kaz is ever complained his customers whining in negative way?
I still remember the QA-forum debacle with Kaz. And then there's his/PD's vague statements for the past decade. Or his recent claims with regards to GTS that are just nonsense (nothing dropped, 85% is offline). People comparing his communication to Ians and then calling Ians lacking in comparison are either insane or pushing an agenda.Have you ever seen Kaz on here? I haven't and this is "GT"Planet!!
I still remember the QA-forum debacle with Kaz. And then there's his/PD's vague statements for the past decade. Or his recent claims with regards to GTS that are just nonsense (nothing dropped, 85% is offline). People comparing his communication to Ians and then calling Ians lacking in comparison are either insane or pushing an agenda.
Comparison is fair and valid, PD hasn't argued with customers who give negative feedback (here, or anywhere), SMS is.
I always regarded Kaz/PD's no-show for the Q/A subforum thing as them being unwilling to face negative feedback at all.Facing negative feedback is skill which is highly needed on customer service, when SMS decided open their marketing channel here at GTP they should understand which kind of consequences it will create, including negative feedback.
How is it valid when PD doesn't interact with it's community at all to begin with?
I always regarded Kaz/PD's no-show for the Q/A subforum thing as them being unwilling to face negative feedback at all.
You don’t really believe the lack of community interaction from PD and Kaz is strategic do you? Even small studios have updates via Reddit at the very least.It's a designer choice
They're wise in longer terms, they aren't stepping in line of fire and committing seppuku like SMS.
False advertising is easy to prove and has no need for supporting evidence. It stands by itself. False advertising is a willful act and can, but not always, be judged a civil or criminal offence. Obviously depending on the detail of the case.
Anyway in the interests of appeasement, I have retracted the statement, although you may need to edit other posts. I have other things to do today instead of get bogged down on this.
Of course he doesn't. How could he if he doesn't communicate with the customers at all to begin with? Have you ever seen Kaz on here? I haven't and this is "GT"Planet!! Yet Ian has been here fielding questions and addressing gamers concerns.
Jordan's mentioned several times that Kaz and PD are aware of GTPlanet and have looked at the forum. I'm not sure how frequently they do, but Jordan does get invited to several events by PD as evident in the news section of this site.
That has almost nothing to do with what I said but note taken anyway.
Matt, while I respect the work you've done identifying bugs I wish you would just ghost with the legal banter.
This isn't the place for it.
I know I've beat up GT pretty good, but I wouldn't threaten Kaz or anyone else with false advertising or willful deceivement.
I think it's great we have a community here that can have constructive differences and engage in debates, but when things turn legal it's just no longer fun.
False advertising is false advertising. It's very easy to prove - "it will do this if you buy it", "but it doesn't do this". It's not fair that it happens and it's not fair that people should be able to continually get away with it [because they always have].
Ian & the Development team earned my respect with Project Cars 1. Of course a newly released game is going to have faults, it's 2017. Besides I thought this was a Q&A not a PC2 bugs thread? Am I lost or something?
No, actually. I genuinely enjoyed playing Project Cars 1. I thought it was pretty decent, & it's called an opinion. Learn what one is before you call me out. I just look on the positive side of things.So all it takes to earn your respect is to release a buggy game, never completely fix it, then release another buggy game? Your respect is very easily earned then.
What is your end game here with all of this nonsense? Do you want everyone to stop playing pCars 2? You claim false advertising over and over because a feature doesn’t work as you expect it too or there are bugs. Have you played any AAA title in the last decade? They ALL have issues.Well I get asked directly or indirectly about it (or challenged) so I respond when I can.
It is was it is. I wish it wasn't. False advertising is false advertising. It's very easy to prove - "it will do this if you buy it", "but it doesn't do this". It's not fair that it happens and it's not fair that people should be able to continually get away with it [because they always have].
It seems like I'm picking on PC2 but I've been detached from gaming for several years. It is my experience of re-entry. If it had been another title sold in the same way, my response would be the same where applicable. I guess you lot just got unlucky!
I like to think you got lucky that there are some who don't take no **** and all you have to do is go along for the ride.
Fair enough. I wouldn't really say I'm having fun either and I definitely don't when a bug screws my race through no fault of my own, other than being tricked into buying a pre-order for the first, and only, time.
No, actually. I genuinely enjoyed playing Project Cars 1. I thought it was pretty decent, it's called an opinion. Learn what one is before you call me out. I look on the positive side of things, unlike you.
I've edited my comment as I thought I went a bit too harsh on you there. But thank you I guess. Well that's your opinion, but i genuinely enjoyed PC1. I still play it now. & when I heard that there was going to be a PC2, i was hyped to hear that because of his much I enjoyed PC1. & now I'm enjoying PC2, & tend to avoid the bugs as best as I can. Are you a video games developer? Can you make the perfect racing game without any bugs?Glad you enjoyed it. My opinion still stands that your respect is easily earned if you require nothing more than unfinished and buggy games to earn it.
You asked if anyone's ever seen Kaz on here. I was giving you an answer with some context. While he may not post, it's not like he (or his team) aren't around.
I like to think you got lucky that there are some who don't take no **** and all you have to do is go along for the ride.
I'd rather not take that ride as this sort of behavior can do more harm than good.