Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,887 comments
  • 2,907,400 views
There's one thing that an SR20 won't make alot of that a 5.0 will - Torque, and down low in the powerband. Besides which, why would you put a 4-cylinder in the place of a 5.0? Hell, I can at least see why you would put one in a regular 4-cylinder car, but you're downgrading for chissakes!
 
dsc000135yy.jpg

dsc000140iy.jpg
 
@ PunkRock: nothing wrong with paint or body, interior can be easily fixed. I don't think it's THAT bad.
 
Toronado
Why not? They both make about as much power anyways, and ones just silly lighter.

In all honesty, the only problem I see with it is the hood, which would cost $10 to fix.
Because the SR20DE maxed out is making about as much power as the stock 5.0 is making with 150,000 miles on it. For the cost and effort of making the SR20 swap, a plain easily-built 5.0 could be making a boatload more power. It's simple math.

Nothing against the Japanese engine; it's an icon of high-rev durability and power, but it's not the be-all and end-all of performance. For the money spent on the swap there are wayyyyy better ways to make a 5 liter Mustang quicker.
 
Someone wanted a picture of the ricers in the film 'Cars,' I have sourced one of the cars, the charcter 'Wingo.'

Wingosilvia.jpg

Cheers,
Matt.
 
Duke
Because the SR20DE maxed out is making about as much power as the stock 5.0 is making with 150,000 miles on it. For the cost and effort of making the SR20 swap, a plain easily-built 5.0 could be making a boatload more power. It's simple math.
Nothing against the Japanese engine; it's an icon of high-rev durability and power, but it's not the be-all and end-all of performance. For the money spent on the swap there are wayyyyy better ways to make a 5 liter Mustang quicker.
Oh. I wasn't sure how much it would actually cost to swap the engine. My apologies.
 
Rumple Foreskin
B56215483.jpg

Originality points of the type of car he chose.

Head over to http://www.dodgeintrepid.net sometime. You'll find plenty more like it. This one was an example of something I can not stand: riced out 'Treps! They're cruisers, not racers!!

If you thought that Intrepid was bad, check out these ugly ones:
F&F:
396376_36_full.jpg

White version of one above?
540596_2_full.jpg

F&F meets WTF?!?
553705_9_full.jpg
553705_7_full.jpg


"Outrageous mod" Intrepid (click here) :lol:
And finally, another ricer Trep
293234_60_full.jpg


All I can say is :yuck: ! I own an '03 model and after driving it I can say it is *not* a sports car; never has been and never will be. To each they're own, but these cars were mutilated, IMO.
 
I wish I could've had a camera with me today. While I was on 95 I saw this guy with a Celica ( the generation with the 2 circle headlights ) that had put a Supra back end on his car with a huge ricer wing and everything.
 
well, he obviously didn't like how the doors opened.

as a car, it fails, but it makes a nice peice of abstract art....if you take off the DAMN DUBS!
 
Ok, so why do the rear doors open like that? (thats a new one too!)
That would surely make it harder to get in and out of the rear of the car would it not?
Maybe its so you can use it as a coffee table or something! :\

edit:
Acoord18.jpg

Hahahahahaaa....*cough*...*Splutter*....ahahaa....*chokes and dies*.............
 
Back