This has to be a joke right.
I wouldn't really call a paintjob questionable. Since when does paint affect performance anyways? I'm pretty sure that car didn't get any slower from that. The bodykit may be a little questionable, but it isn't far off from a stock one, it just has those things on the side, which may, perhaps, add the slightest bit of downforce.
Now that I see the interior, I take back what I said, it is definantly questionable. But paint to me is just a matter of taste, since it has no effect on performance. Unless of course, you have a lightweight paint job, like the Cusco civic.To some people, a chrome paintjob is just as questionable as a bright-neon-green paintjob with taco-orange bumpers, a neon-pink hood and several vinyls of male dancers slapping each other in the rump with a ping-pong paddle. Or whatever it is that ricers do to their cars these days.
A lack of a bodykit does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of rice.
ЯebЯuM;2480628It's questionable because it means the car is no longer street legal. That car would blind anyone when driven in sunlight.
Besides which, what is the point of having LCD monitors in the boot, where no-body going to be able to watch them?
Besides which, what is the point of having LCD monitors in the boot, where no-body going to be able to watch them?
ЯebЯuM;2480761Hmmm... depends, if you're a mafia hitman, there may be people in the boot willing to watch a movie before going to sleep with the fishes.