Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,887 comments
  • 2,907,940 views
Yeah, I'm thinking Corolla.

EDIT Never mind, I now look at the side view and see a Cavalierly designed profile--of a Cavalier.
 
This has to be a joke right.

I just found out it indeed is just a joke...

Now, before you go and say it's sad that someone took a completely good roadworthy car and did this to it as a joke, remember it's a Chevrolet Cavalier... they actually put it out of its misery. :lol:
 
That car was definately developed as a joke.

Nevertheless, it looks... umm, *insert random comment here*
 
i like how they used the bottoms of soda bottles for the rear lights! :lol:
and look where the hinges are, do those doors open like the CLK GTR?

2000-Mercedes-Benz-AMG-CLK-GTR-Road-Version-(Maisto-1:18-scale)-silver-A-640.jpeg

sorry i cant find any pics of a real clk gtr with the doors open from that angle :dunce:
 
I see the plate says Quebec. I would love to see what happens when that thing gets wet from the snow.
 
I can understand why the snowblower he mounted into the airdam is there. It snows in Canada. What I don't understand is why he put the release shaft so it blows back out in front of the car. Hm.
 
The more I think about it, the more I wonder: When he is driving down the road, why oh why does the hood not fly off? There is roughly 2 inches in between the headlights and the hood, not to mention the aforementioned snowblower exit shaft (what else cold it be? It's clearly not connected to anything). Can he even go over 60 with it without blowing the hood comepletely off, or possibly even (in a far more humurous tone and in combination with the planks of wood that is supposed to be a spoiler) flip the entire car?
 
I wouldn't really call a paintjob questionable. Since when does paint affect performance anyways? I'm pretty sure that car didn't get any slower from that. The bodykit may be a little questionable, but it isn't far off from a stock one, it just has those things on the side, which may, perhaps, add the slightest bit of downforce.
 
Could you replace that thumbnail with the full image, GT Pro? I can't quite read the text when it's so small.

I wouldn't really call a paintjob questionable. Since when does paint affect performance anyways? I'm pretty sure that car didn't get any slower from that. The bodykit may be a little questionable, but it isn't far off from a stock one, it just has those things on the side, which may, perhaps, add the slightest bit of downforce.

To some people, a chrome paintjob is just as questionable as a bright-neon-green paintjob with taco-orange bumpers, a neon-pink hood and several vinyls of male dancers slapping each other in the rump with a ping-pong paddle. Or whatever it is that ricers do to their cars these days.

A lack of a bodykit does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of rice.




Of course, I personally think a chrome paintjob can be awesome, but it's really more of a Mercedes-Benz or Audi thing than a BMW thing.
 
if you ask me, that is the single sexiest M3 i have ever seen :drool:
that widebody kit and those wheels make me drool, the fact that its supercharged only increases the size of the puddle by my feet!
And if i may say, thats probably the most subtle car Max power have ever featured in thier chav-mag....(sorry but most of it is just crap..)
 
To some people, a chrome paintjob is just as questionable as a bright-neon-green paintjob with taco-orange bumpers, a neon-pink hood and several vinyls of male dancers slapping each other in the rump with a ping-pong paddle. Or whatever it is that ricers do to their cars these days.

A lack of a bodykit does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of rice.
Now that I see the interior, I take back what I said, it is definantly questionable. But paint to me is just a matter of taste, since it has no effect on performance. Unless of course, you have a lightweight paint job, like the Cusco civic.

I consider questionable as something that effects the car's performance.
 
It's questionable because it means the car is no longer street legal. That car would blind anyone when driven in sunlight.
 
ЯebЯuM;2480628
It's questionable because it means the car is no longer street legal. That car would blind anyone when driven in sunlight.

Exactly what I thought...
The chrome makes the whole car ugly...it should have been in another color :yuck:
 
Besides which, what is the point of having LCD monitors in the boot, where no-body going to be able to watch them?

Hmmm... depends, if you're a mafia hitman, there may be people in the boot willing to watch a movie before going to sleep with the fishes.
 
ЯebЯuM;2480761
Hmmm... depends, if you're a mafia hitman, there may be people in the boot willing to watch a movie before going to sleep with the fishes.

So why not a Mustang? The people could then decide: Watch a movie and sleep with the fishes, or pull the rope, jump out and sleep with the nurses.
 
have you ever tried fitting a grown man inside the boot of a Mustang?

I've had three and whenever I had to do something which had me going into the trunk (fixing the rear speakers or something of the sort) I always ended up cramped and only able to move that which I had to (mainly the hand which screwed the screws or something).
 
Back