Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,887 comments
  • 2,907,136 views
PunkRock
lin.jpg

Whoa.

Wait, why is this in the car forums? It's a car you say? No it isn't, it's a train...


Oh wait, it is a car
 
This interior would make you puke on long cruises


Why would you write something on the radiator (intercooler?)




I thought drawing women on the car went out of style in the 1970s


When will they stop with the LCD screens in unfunctional places?






Why people put low profiles on SUVs still escapes me




the ever-elusive non-functional rear-engined Mini!


Nice headlights 👍


Exhaust pipes?


Why would someone tune a Smart? What's next, Yugo tuning?


Understeer, oversteer... hoy about non-steer?


runner-up for most hideous rims


Speakers on the hood... about as functional as lcd screens everywhere


WTF?


So um... ya can't see where you're going, eh?
 
It's on bags, you can jack those trucks up to 18 inches off the ground depending on the bag set up...but assuming is just for show driving I'm going to say he can get it at least 8-10 inches off the ground.
 
0220hq.jpg


:yuck: well at least if it ever goes out in the rain its gonna blow up :dopey:
the wide arches on that are disgusting

0092qe.jpg


thats functional so its not that bad but the spoiler appears to be a bit stupid!
why put a big ass spoiler on it as well as wheelie bars!?!? its prolly got enough power 2 pull a wheelie without the spoiler and plus if all 4 wheels were on the ground u could probably do better 1/4 runs anyway, aerodynamically speaking
 
The spoiler is not supposed to make the front pop up; it's supposed to push down on the back wheels and keep the car stable at speed. In a car with that short a wheelbase it's probably a handful keeping it going straight, and the wheelie bars keep the nose down at launch.

I don't find those questionable at all.
 
Duke
The spoiler is not supposed to make the front pop up; it's supposed to push down on the back wheels and keep the car stable at speed. In a car with that short a wheelbase it's probably a handful keeping it going straight, and the wheelie bars keep the nose down at launch.

I don't find those questionable at all.


toyomatt84
I'd like to see you drive it without that wing, bondy_1625. It would prove to be quite difficult. The tail end would be everywhere.

and so again bondy_1625 is wrong! :P well w/e at least im learning 👍
 
The questionnable issue on the pic was actually the paint job... "The Lopez Connection"... sounds so 70s Mexican B-movie :lol: Plus, the car is quite ugly
 
VIPFREAK
No.. No.. that WAS a 300C. :grumpy:



Yeah... I found that odd, I wonder what the interior looks like? :odd:


Speaking of that 300C, I found this at Supercars.net

Specially prepared for the SEMA trade show, this Chrysler 300 was given a special paint job by Santini Paint USA. They added an unusual touch to the car by adorning the sides of the car with a traditional Frech curve. This type of design was frequently seen on 1930s Bugattis, which might explain why this car is called the Royale, probably a reference to the Type 41 Royale Bugatti which is one of the greatest cars ever made.

To match the paint scheme, Custom white wall wheels were made to wrap around 22 inch American Racing wheels.

Inside the 300 Royale is well appointed with wood trim and a heavily pattered interior decor.

EDIT: Oh crap, nevermind... they're not the same car... they look much alike, though
 
Back