- 2,364
- Albuquerque, NM
- BloodDiamondPant
Is that a '90s Suburban in Japan? OMG
I don't even... Hahahahahah! This has probably been posted before, hasn't it?
Is that a '90s Suburban in Japan? OMG
I don't even... Hahahahahah! This has probably been posted before, hasn't it?
Actually my main issue I guess is assuming you were talking about the 69 500, which is what 99.99999999% of enthusiasts (Mopar guys like me, included) will think of when you just say Charger 500.Your main issue here is thinking that the 500 was only offered in 69, when there were late 68 models and there were also 70s Charger 500 (the one that I'm talking about) the version made so famous by the F&F franchise.
There were also early third gen versions as well.
Actually my main issue I guess is assuming you were talking about the 69 500, which is what 99.99999999% of enthusiasts (Mopar guys like me, included) will think of when you just say Charger 500.
There was no 500 for the 68 model year. Yes, it was introduced in Sept 68, but for the 69 model year. Production numbers from 68 back this up and no Charger 500 has the 68 round sidemarker lights, other than the 1 prototype that they built. That prototype is also the only one that has a 68 VIN code.
The 1970 500 was nothing more than a minor trim package and was virtually indistinguishable visually from most other Chargers (except the R/T), other than some badging. And seeing how this car has none of those things from the 500 and all of the visual features of the R/T, this is why I fail to see the mimicry of the 500.
It looks like someone was playing too much NFS Underground.
I brust out of laughter when I saw these. Jesus H. Christ, those are so freaking bad, pfhahaha.
But it doesn't mimic any features of the 1970 500, only those of the R/T. Anyway, we'll have to agree to disagree, as this certainly isn't the thread for this discussion.You fail to see it for the very reason I pointed out and you agreed to, not all Mopar guys (I'm one too) are going to just blanket state the Charger 500 as a 69 model only due to the limited addition NASCAR relationship. I also pointed out why this is thanks to a certain movie franchise. Perhaps you may be one to think with in the narrow range which is fine, but it was correct to call it a Charger 500 or mimic since it went beyond 69 no matter how you want to split hairs.
What he said. Heh.It looks like someone was playing too much NFS Underground.
"NEVRHIGH"? Well he might be, the smoky way.Oh god. Make it stop.
Change the FUGLY rims, raise it an inch and I'd daily that bish.Gran Torino wagon convertible
View attachment 200385
But you need, like, maximum protection, man.
There was another like it too, and even worse.But you need, like, maximum protection, man.
Wat?Gran Torino wagon convertible
View attachment 200385
"Love it"- Typical RICErs
I just keep finding the convertible conversions, although this wouldn't be so bad without the generic lowrider treatment.