Rate the vehicle above you (READ THE OP)

[ProjectWHaT]

2006 smart ForFour

It's like what Porsche did for the Cayenne and Panemera. They took a 911 and enlarged it, but for the ForFour, they took a ForTwo and enlarged it.

 

[urbanite9]

2002 Volvo V40

9/10 Yes! Volvo's safety rubber bumpers on the bumpers!

Lexus LX (aka Lexus Land Cruiser)

 

[Slash]

7/10. One of the better looking modern SUVs.


1986/87 Kawasaki Tecate 3

 

[GT5Redsucker23]

3.5/10

 

[RandomCarGuy17]

8/10; I really, really like the f10 M5!
---------------------------------------

Shelby Lancer

 

[mustang fanatic]

7/10 because Shelby.

 

[MedigoFlame]

1.5/10 Wretched mall-roader tanks made to compete with the Escalade. Just as bad when turned into limo's...

Saab 9-2X Aero

 

[AudiMan2011]

3/10- Guilty of fraud.

 

[GranTurismo916]

8/10

1977 Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2000

 

[Sage Ages]

6.5/10 It's nice, but something about it just doesn't work for me.

Honda Rebel

Transmission blew, engine went a few months later, and countless different occasions where the oil leaked.

Just curious. Was the previous owner a bit, um.... young? 💡

 

[Dagger311]

It was new at the time. We had the Cavalier (bought used), which broke, bought the accord, broke, and now we have the Rogue and a used quest.

 

[Sage Ages]

What year?

 

[Dagger311]

The Accord? 2004.

 

[Slash]

8/10. Having been up close and personal with my grandpas before, It's a nice bike. Thought pretty quiet and a bit underpowered for it's engine size, so I had to take points off for that.

 

[GranTurismo916]

2/10

McLaren Lark F1 GTR

 

[Sage Ages]

The Accord? 2004.

So, you're judging a car 12 years older based off a newer model? I'm not saying it's wrong or right, but that seems like quite an assumption.

You can't tell people what to rate. If they hate the car, so be it, they'll give it an 0/10. It doesn't affect you...well, at least it shouldn't.

True, but they should at least have a reason. "Why not?" is kinda ridiculous.

 

[Dagger311]

2/10.

 

[GranTurismo916]

True, but they should at least have a reason. "Why not?" is kinda ridiculous.

I can't disagree with that.

2/10.

http://[domain blocked due to malware]/instances/500x/49968517.jpg

 

[Dagger311]

So, you're judging a car 12 years older based off a newer model? I'm not saying it's wrong or right, but that seems like quite an assumption.

Yes, I am. Even if they're more reliable now, still ugly and slow.

Although, that mpg though, I revise it to 3/10.

Edit: That one's ugly though. A stock one would be 10/10.

 

[GranTurismo916]

Edit: That one's ugly though.

 

[Dagger311]

Yeah... The Lark on the front ruins it .

 

[GranTurismo916]

Yeah... The Lark on the front ruins it .

k den

 

[Sage Ages]

Edit: That one's ugly though. A stock one would be 10/10.

But it is stock.

Unless you're referring to the McLaren. In that case, just ignore this.

 

[Dagger311]

k den

Wat?

But it is stock.

Unless you're referring to the McLaren. In that case, just ignore this.

I was, really should have said that I was reffering to that. Reading it back, sounds like I was still talking about the accord.

 

[GranTurismo916]

Wat?

O-K T-H-E-N.

7/10

Saab 900 GLS TA Auto

 

[Dagger311]

Ohh, I read that as like, a lions den .

Anyway, 3/10.
This is aparently a "Black Devil Skin" Camaro.

 

[CarBastard]

Ohh, I read that as like, a lions den .

Anyway, 3/10.
This is aparently a "Black Devil Skin" Camaro.

-8/10

Mazda MX6 1st gen. F2T engine is too under-rated!

 

[Gerarghini]

5/10

Infiniti G20t P11

 

[Slash]

I can't disagree with that.

http://[domain blocked due to malware]/instances/500x/49968517.jpg

One does not simply rate an F250 a 2/10.

 

[GranTurismo916]

I've always liked this car for some reason. 7/10.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X "I1 1EGAL"