Bricks, huh? I think I've heard of it. They for real?The hoarders go elsewhere looking for the bricks they'll never use.
Why 22WMR?The real impossible thing to find right now is 22 magnum
Don't do it. A friend bought one and he HATED it. You can't put your hand in front of the cylinder as you know, and putting your forehand behind or under the cylinder is not something that's easy to get the hang of to shoot accurately.Why 22WMR?
Thinking of buying a revolving carbine, those are just so neat.
Shoots either 45 round balls with black powder or with a cylinder swap shoot 44 special. Those were used in the civil war. Its pretty much a regular single action revolver with a butt stock and an 18 inch barrel.
![]()
I know that you have to shoot it differently than your average rifle, but this doesn't concern me. I've tried the stance before (with a small muzzle loader pistol that had a butt stock) and as long as the rifle is not super nose heavy or obscenely long its not really an issue. You just have to see it as long barreled handgun with a butt stock, not as a rifle.Don't do it. A friend bought one and he HATED it. You can't put your hand in front of the cylinder as you know, and putting your forehand behind or under the cylinder is not something that's easy to get the hang of to shoot accurately.
I'm a huge fan of the .22WMR, it should have taken over and replace the .22lr. Jacketed bullet, at 100yds the power of the .22lr at the muzzle, still small, quiet and inexpensive. Shoots through 5'' of oak at 50yds with the Hornady 40 grain JSPCan you add a Magpul foregrip maybe?
As for the .22WMR, I've never shot one, but couple of people I know who shoots them says they really like it. Personally, I'm perfectly happy with the .22LR for how common & practical they are.
It's been said that .22LR production has been 24/7. Perhaps the production of the .22WMR is being affected by the resources being prioritized for .22LR? Just a wild guess.
I don't know if this applies to the .22's, but when the ammo shortage hit after the Sandy Hook tragedy, it was explained that, once the existing stock/inventory in the country depleted, it was very hard for the ammunition manufacturers to pick up the pace and meet the demand. I think it was the NRA magazine story I read that implied that this stockpile of existing retail ammunition, they used to serve as a buffer when the manufacturers tried to keep up with the demand.Ah, I bet thats the case, they're probably using all their rimfire resources for 22lr.
Woooo.... slick calculation.And my backpacks use the same diameter straps and clasps, which means that if my SHTF backpack should break down I can repair it with my rifle sling.![]()
Thank you.Looks very cool, too!
The rounds in my pic remind me of ''honeycomb energy crystals'' you could collect in an old AMIGA game, Turrican it was called. Same color. Great game. Childhood flashback!I really like the pic, also(almost as neat as the first one). That look of glow is really cool. :
So is an idiot with a knife, a motorized vehicle, explosives, gasoline, sharp objects, blunt objects... Bottom line is, idiots are alway dangerous and you cant ban everything that might be dangerous in their hands. Strangely anti gun people never mention the number one killer - traffic. If you wanted to do that you'd have to ban cars first because there are many MANY more idiots killing people with their vehicles than with guns. Gun deaths are a joke compared to traffic deaths. Also more people get stabbed than shot. What about banning all knives? (England, I'm looking at you)And an idiot with a gun is a lethal danger to other people around him or her.
Whereas in the UK, an idiot is just an idiot, and not a potential murderer.