Real Life VS Standard Cars!

[Harsk100]

In GT6 it may be an Elan S1 '62, but in real life, it looks like a Elan S2 '64.

 

[Turbo]

In GT6 it may be an Elan S1 '62, but in real life, it looks like a Elan S2 '64.

Yeah, if you look in the "list of cars represented incorrectly" thread, you find out there are a few mistakes with the Elan.

 

[lxmmy]

 

[Harsk100]

Yeah, if you look in the "list of cars represented incorrectly" thread, you find out there are a few mistakes with the Elan.

The mistakes are:

Lotus Elan S1 '62
Incorrectly modeled as the '64 version with the round tailights.

So, that Elan which is in GT6, is incorrectly modeled. So, it is an Elan S2 '64, not an Elan S1 '62.

 

[Turbo]

67 Mercury Cougar

 

[Harsk100]

Nissan 200SX Type X '96
GT6

Real Life:

As you can see, the real car and GT6's 200SX S13 are not equal. Here's the reason:

 

[lxmmy]

 

[jontikis]

.
.
.
.

 

[Harsk100]

1992 EG civic

I have Corrected the pictures, just to have a comparison of the original car between GT6 and real life.

 

[vettefreak95]

.
.
.

The Furai actually looks better than most standard cars IMO.

 

[lxmmy]

 

[Turbo]

I have Corrected the pictures, just to have a comparison of the original car between GT6 and real life.

thanks Harsk, I couldnt find any good pictures when I searched.

 

[Harsk100]

View attachment 441851View attachment 441853

Correction of the picture.

 

[TS050]

Oh, wow, are we forgetting that there are some standards that actually look pretty good?

Or are we just focusing on the ugliest standards?

 

[Harsk100]

Oh, wow, are we forgetting that there are some standards that actually look pretty good?

Or are we just focusing on the ugliest standards?

Let's say that we're focusing on all standards.

 

[lxmmy]

Oh, wow, are we forgetting that there are some standards that actually look pretty good?

Or are we just focusing on the ugliest standards?

I would say some pretty well worked ones.

 

[Castrol96]

.
.
.
.

There seriously needs to be re-texturing on this car.

 

[NightHawkFur]

*sigh* you mean:

 

[lxmmy]

 

[another_jakhole]

Someone get the Griffith 500 in here in honor of @Griffith500.

It's the best I could find one in green.

 

[tankuroded]

*sigh* you mean:

The GT picture is the wrong color anyway.

 

[sokira]

Nissan 200SX Type X '96
GT6

Real Life:

As you can see, the real car and GT6's 200SX S13 are not equal. Here's the reason:

Isn't that one? From 1997 with the SR20DET turbo engine.

http://nissancars.kamikaze-drive.com/n1i8s0ssaxne221003.htm

 

[Harsk100]

Isn't that one ? From 1997

http://nissancars.kamikaze-drive.com/n1i8s0ssaxne221003.htm

No, it isn't. These pictures are from a 180SX.

 

[ALeftRighter]

*sigh* you mean:

I like but I cry

 

[Arixant]

No, it isn't. These pictures are from a 180SX.

Thats because a type x 200sx is a fictional car. that trim never made it outside of japan.

 

[Cowboy]

 

[Harsk100]

Thats because a type x 200sx is a fictional car. that trim never made it outside of japan.

I agree. The 200SX Type X does not exist in real life. And neither the 240SX Type X Exists in real life.

 

[ALB123]

What really drives me up a wall is this: The 1994 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R32) is a Premium model. Why isn't the 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R32)? Why isn't the 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec N1 (R32)? And so on...

I'm not an expert in Nissan Skylines, but at a quick glance they appear almost identical to me. Let's say that they're not. Perhaps the V-Spec II has different headlights or taillights, or both. A professional 3D modeler could make those changes in a day or two at the most.

I think it's really cool that we have 1,000 different model Skylines & Miatas and any other cars that people love. But let's be honest, if you really love the R32 Skyline are you going to drive any of the Standard versions or are you going to drive the lone Premium version that we have? I know that they can't convert every car into a Premium because it literally involves re-doing hundreds of the cars from scratch. In this case, all PD really has to do is copy the Premium R32 that they already have, make any subtle cosmetic changes (if there are any) and voila! they now have several R32 Premium model cars.

Even if they couldn't have done all that for launch of GT6 they could have kept one single modeler on "Conversion Duty" and gone through the Skylines and Miatas and whatever else and taken care of this. Then cars could have been replaced during updates.

Am is there something I'm ignoring that would make this impossible?

 

[Harsk100]

What really drives me up a wall is this: The 1994 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec II (R32) is a Premium model. Why isn't the 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec (R32)? Why isn't the 1993 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec N1 (R32)? And so on...

I'm not an expert in Nissan Skylines, but at a quick glance they appear almost identical to me. Let's say that they're not. Perhaps the V-Spec II has different headlights or taillights, or both. A professional 3D modeler could make those changes in a day or two at the most.

I think it's really cool that we have 1,000 different model Skylines & Miatas and any other cars that people love. But let's be honest, if you really love the R32 Skyline are you going to drive any of the Standard versions or are you going to drive the lone Premium version that we have? I know that they can't convert every car into a Premium because it literally involves re-doing hundreds of the cars from scratch. In this case, all PD really has to do is copy the Premium R32 that they already have, make any subtle cosmetic changes (if there are any) and voila! they now have several R32 Premium model cars.

Even if they couldn't have done all that for launch of GT6 they could have kept one single modeler on "Conversion Duty" and gone through the Skylines and Miatas and whatever else and taken care of this. Then cars could have been replaced during updates.

Am is there something I'm ignoring that would make this impossible?

The difference between the 1993 and 1994 is the 1993 model is that the lights are a little squares.

1993 V-Spec:

1994 V-Spec II:

 

[lxmmy]