Hi, I have a request for replicating a '79-'84 Porsche 911 SC. That, or some input on my current tune in GT6:
DeLorean '04
Detuned to 177HP
Racing hard suspension
Double plate clutch
CH tires (front & rear)
Weight reduction level 1
Window weight reduction
Added 3kg to get weight to 1160kg
No other modifications
The hard suspension seems to help, but I think the DeLorean's longer wheelbase needs some work. I tried to mod the RUF RGT '00, but it's not possible to get the HP below 189HP and the 6-speed transmission isn't right. The next closest eligible car would be the BTR, but the turbocharged engine doesn't work either.
If you have insight on the best way to recreate this car it would appreciated.
Thank you!
Happy Birthday to this great garage!
Thank you @Ridox2JZGTE, for all the wonderful cars and the knowledge you've shared to us!
Happy Birthday Your Garage Ridox2JZGTE.Your replics are the best,good job.Please continue this garage.THX
Hey Ridox,
I'd like to pass on my congratulations for your garage anniversary/birthday.
I'd also like to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Xmas & a Happy New Year.
View attachment 105459 Car: RUF CTR "Yellow Bird" '87
Tyres: Comfort Soft (I can also recommend Sports Hard)
Suspension: Height-Adjustable, Fully-Customisable Suspension
(Note: I've listed an optional suspension setup in post #2 below)
Ride HeightDrivetrain (Transmission)
Front: 130 mmSpring Rate
Rear: 130 mm
Front: 4.16 kgf/mmDampers (Compression)
Rear: 7.49 kgf/mm
Front: 1 levelDampers (Extension)
Rear: 1 level
Front: 1 levelAnti-Roll Bars
Rear: 1 level
Front: 1 levelCamber Angle (-)
Rear: 1 level
Front: 0.0 degreesToe Angle
Rear: 0.0 degrees
Front: 0.00 degreesBrake Discs & Calipers: Standard
Rear: 0.20 degrees
Brake Balance
Front: 4
Rear: 4
Fully-Customisable TransmissionDrivetrain
1: 3.154(Note: Due to transmission setting limitations the gear ratios of the "normal" car could not be set, instead these are the gear ratios of the Switzerland version of the car, which were different due to noise regulations. Also, the real car only have 5 gears, so you shouldn't really use the 6th.)
2: 1.895
3: 1.333
4: 1.036
5: 0.861
6: 0.667
Final Gear: 3.440
All standardPower
Power limiter: 50% (230 BHP)Body
Everything else: Standard
Ballast Weight: 60 kgFor ideas on paint and rims: Check this link. (It's a google picture search for Porsche 911 Carrera 3.2)
Ballast Position: -17% (Should give a balance of 43 : 57)
Everything else: Standard
(Note: I haven't found any weight balance specs of this car, but I found a source that said that the weight balance of a 1970's 911 was 43 : 57, so with nothing better to go for I went for that. In my car I also added an extra 70 kg (total of 130 kg ballast) to replicate the weight of a driver.)
This tune is based on what info I could find on the internet. The suspension part is a bit dodgy, and while the power limiter does limit the BHP, the torque is still about twice the amount of the real car. If you have any ideas for how this tune can be improved, feel free to share it
I recently tried a few of your old replicas and I am amazed
However, there is on thing I noticed: You used the 2006 S2000 with the F22 engine as a base for this replica. Does this car really use the F22 engine as a base or is it one of the older, but higher reving F20s? I could not find any info on this. Tkank you and a merry christmas
Ken Wolf / Terai Engineering / Art Sports / Rain-X
ZA9C Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversario #88
1994 Season All Japan Grand Touring Car Championship Replica
Tuned to replicate #88 Art Sports/Rain-X Countach 1994
Comfort Soft to Racing Hard
CAR : Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary '88
Tire : Comfort Soft to Racing Hard
Specs 1994 JGTC ( Official Power 455+PS )
Horsepower: 449 HP at 6900 RPM
Torque: 373.9 ft-lb at 5200 RPM
Power Limiter at : 94.5%
Weight: 1250 kg
Ballast : 29 kg
Ballast Position : 50
Weight Distribution : 42 / 58
Performance Points: 527
Specs 1994 JGTC ( Full Power 550 PS )
Horsepower: 542 HP at 7300 RPM
Torque: 419.7 ft-lb at 5400 RPM
Power Limiter at : 98.7%
Weight: 1250 kg
Ballast : 29 kg
Ballast Position : 50
Weight Distribution : 42 / 58
Performance Points: 553
GT AUTO
NO Oil change
Improve Body Rigidity ( Installed in this build ) - The real Rain-X Countach has roll cage and chassis reinforcement. NOT Mandatory this time, please try without first
Custom Rear Wing :
Wing Mount Standard Type D
Wing Small Type I
Winglets Small Type J
Height : +0
Width : -75
Wheels : Stock
Car Paint : Lightning Yellow or Crystal White
Wing Paint : Lightning Yellow or Crystal White ( Matching color with the car )
Gauges : Free.
Driver Number :
Base Type C
Typeface Type A
Number : 88
Tuning Parts Installed :
Semi Racing Exhaust
Sports Computer - Only for Full Power
Intake Tuning - Only for Full Power
Isometric Exhaust Manifold - Only for Full Power
Suspension Fully Customizable Kit
Fully Customizable Dog Clutch Transmission - OPTIONAL, use stock 5 speed for authenticity
Adjustable LSD
Weight Reduction Stage 3
Carbon Hod ( Body Color )
Window Weight Reduction
Suspension - KONI Racing Coilover
Front, Rear
Ride Height: 70 70
Spring Rate: 14.00 18.66
Dampers (Compression): 5 4
Dampers (Extension): 3 3
Anti-Roll Bars: 4 5
Camber Angle: 2.7 1.5
Toe Angle: 0.05 0.10
OPTIONAL 5 SPEED SEQUENTIAL HEWLAND TGTA-200
DOG CLUTCH TRANSMISSION - HEWLAND Sequential 5 Speed TGTA-200
1994 JGTC OFFICIAL POWER 449HP/455+PS
Install all power parts
Set Default
Use Default Final
Set Auto Max Speed at 220kmh /137mph
Adjust each gear :
1st 2.923
2nd 2.067
3rd 1.611
4th 1.316
5th 1.091
Set Final 3.100 - Optional Final : 2.818, 2.583 for more top speed or higher final : 3.444 for better acceleration.
DOG CLUTCH TRANSMISSION - HEWLAND Sequential 5 Speed TGTA-200
1994 JGTC FULL POWER 542HP/550PS
Install all power parts
Set Default
Use Default Final
Set Auto Max Speed at 230kmh /143mph
Adjust each gear :
1st 2.923
2nd 2.067
3rd 1.611
4th 1.316
5th 1.091
Set Final 3.100 - Optional Final : 2.818, 2.583 for more top speed or higher final : 3.444 for better acceleration.
Optional Gear Ratios for 3rd to 5th :
3rd : 1.647, 1.625, 1.588, 1.556
4th : 1.350, 1.333, 1.278, 1.263
5th : 1.115, 1.107, 1.050, 1.000, 0.960
LSD 2 way
Initial Torque : 18
Acceleration Sensitivity: 27
Braking Sensitivity: 27
AERO
Rear : 20 ( Max )
Brake Balance:
7/8 ( personal BB) or for ABS 0 wheel : 7/8, for ABS 1 - feel free to use your preferred brake balance.
Recommended setting for DS3 user :
Steering sensitivity at +1 or +2, all aids off, except ABS 1 ( if not comfortable with ABS 0 ) with 7/8 brake balance as starting point.
Notes :
The Ken Wolf/Terai Engineering/Art Sports/Rain-X ZA9C Countach 25th Anniversary was raced in 1994 season All Japan Grand Touring Car Championship.
The Rain-X Countach for short, was entered by JLOC ( Japan Lamborghini Owner's Club ) member Teruaki Terai. With cooperation of Ken Wolf, Art Sports ( exotic car dealer ) and Rain-X sponsoring the team, the Rain-X Countach was rushed to participate in JGTC races.
The Countach only had minimal modification compared to other teams, with stock differential, gearbox, engine, and clutch. The suspension, intake and exhaust has been known to be upgraded as well as brakes and wheel for racing on slick tires. The official power was 455+PS, but there are reports of the engine capable of 550PS which is plausible as the car has racing spec intake and exhaust, and even with stock engine internals, a race prepped engine would yield higher output than stock road engine. I provided 2 power output spec, 455PS and 550PS, feel free to remove the limiter on the 455PS spec to enjoy unrestricted what if power at 480+PS or go mental with 550PS spec.
For weight, I had to do some unconventional method to get the information. I used specs from very old SNES official JGTC game, of which I have read the ROM inside to get the detailed car specs ( 455+PS,1250kg )
Suspension is custom on the car, with spring rate and ratio optimized to handle the rigors of racing slick grip level. The damper are closely balanced with ARB to maintain composure on high speed to low speed corners with ability to absorb bumps as well. Camber and toe has been set to provide nice balance in handling from comfort soft to racing hard tires.
LSD is 45% lock similar to the road car spec, with low preload, while gearing is stock 5 speed. I have also provided Hewland TGTA 200 5 speed sequential gearbox ratios for the Countach. The 2 sets are each for 455PS and 550PS power spec. Feel free to use it as you see fit ( when stock 5 speed is not good enough ). The base final is 3.100, gives good top speed at close to 170mph, run the optional lower final ( 2.818 / 2.583 ) for more top speed or higher final at 3.444 for lower top speed at twisty track. I also provided several optional Hewland ratios for 3rd to 5th gear for when you want to fine tune for specific track.
The Rain-X Countach was tuned and tested at various tracks from Brands Hatch, Bathurst, Suzuka, Motegi Road Course, and Midfield. When tested without body rigidity installed, 455PS and stock 5 speed , RH tire, at Midfield, it lap in 1:11.494, while with Hewland 5 Speed 455PS, 3.100 Final, body rigidity installed, RH tire, 1:11.0xxs, about 3 tenths quicker.
At Suzuka on SM tire ( closest to real life 1994 slick ), stock 5 speed and body rigidity, 2:15s in 1st lap. The 1995 Suzuka 300 qualifying record by JLOC team driving the Diablo JOTA ( replacement of Rain-X Countach ) was 2:16.417. SH tires maybe necessary to replicate 1994 slick grip level.
I have provided 3 replays for reference and ghost to race with. The 2 replays at Midfield, stock 5 Speed and Hewland 5 speed as mentioned above on RH, and Suzuka on SM 2:15s lap. Enjoy the exciting lap at Midfield and Suzuka
Some good article about the car :
Source from Lambocars.com
The History of JLOC Racing Team in JGTC :
Source from JLOC-NET.com ( official JLOC site )
The original early build was painted in white during test run phase
View attachment 324121
Early yellow painted Rain-X sponsored Countach, note the side intake and hood are still the old version
View attachment 324127
View attachment 324122
Final Form Rain-X Countach with revised side intake and hood,
later on the wheel spokes was painted in yellow
View attachment 324125
The video was taken in late 2013, showing the car still in good running condition, now if only I have the money to buy it
I think the 2003 S2000s are AP2. Correct me if I am wrong. If I find the time, would you mind me doing a replica with the 2003 S2000 and send it to you to check if everything's correct?The Spoon S2000 is indeed AP2, but it has F20C engine ( the demo car was built in 2007 ), I decided to use 2006 car as it's premium car Thank you for still giving time to drive my work Merry Christmas and have a great holiday
Now I wished I could do a hybrid in GT6, F20C on 2006 AP2 S2000
I think the 2003 S2000s are AP2. Correct me if I am wrong. If I find the time, would you mind me doing a replica with the 2003 S2000 and send it to you to check if everything's correct?
And I (We) have to thank you for creating these great replicas. I had the most fun with Orido's red Daily Supra and the S2K. 👍
Merry Christmas @Ridox2JZGTE and all other visitors I hope Santa is good to you all
The setup for the 2003 S2000 is basically the same, just with a bit more power limiting.
I'll update this post with some laptimes later 👍
Tested both at Tsukuba, CS tires, no aids:
2003 S2000 (F20): 1:04,903
2006 S2000 (F22): 1:05,718
The F20 felt way more stable, that might be because of the 10 000 rpm redline, driving this car in this rpm range results into less torque, which makes the car more stable. I think this is the reason for the gap. Also, I had no problems doing that laptime in the F20, but I had to fight with the F22.
I recommend trying both, because I think the F22 can do better on faster, less technical tracks. Both are a pleasure to drive
Here is the setup :
Early Build spec Ted and Sue Richardson's 1962 Buick Skylark Special "Bu" Wicked SEMA GT Award Winner 2003
Full Power - Install all power parts.
Suspension -HEIDTS Rear PRO-G IRS and HEIDTS Front SuperRide II IRS ( Billet Coilover ) with Air Ride : Ride Tech Shockwave
400 F/350 R Spring
Real Life Stance/Visual Ride Height Setup
Front, Rear
Ride Height: 55 120
Spring Rate: 7.14 6.25
Dampers (Compression): 4 2
Dampers (Extension): 1 8
Anti-Roll Bars: 2 7
Camber Angle: 1.0 0.5
Toe Angle: 0.00 0.00
LSD PosiTraction 9" Ford BASE
Initial Torque : 20
Acceleration Sensitivity: 20
Braking Sensitivity: 5
OPTIONAL : Use Stock LSD
Spec : 807HP, 1364kg, 59/41, all power parts, custom suspension and LSD, stock everything else. BB 7/10 ( should work with ABS 1 )
Try with full weight reduction, see if the car drives the same as stock weight. Tested at Apricot Hill on RH tire, 1:24.2s 1st lap, 28s 1st sector and 57 flat last sector, replay file included
Toe are still left at zero all around ( not touched yet ), rear camber set at -0.5 ( the rear PRO-G IRS produces -0.5 camber curve with travel/cornering loads ), front set at modest -1.0 camber
Front IRS SuperRide II spring rate offered 400, 450, 500 and 550, while rear IRS PRO-G IRS spring rate offered 350, 400, 450, 550 ( in lb/in ) Lowest spring rate used on both axle.
Also tested on CS tire with 556HP ( real car power ) at Tsukuba, SSR5 and Bathurst on different damper setup.
Yes, I'm aware with that ...2015 and 2016 is coming, I read these 2 old threads, the early days of me on GTP, so many didn't like me with my no ABS campaign, most of them are inactive today I have been playing GT since GT 1 in 1997, started tuning replicas from GT2 days ( when I also started to get deep in JDM tuning culture in real life ), but I started a repica garage recently in GT6 Long way, and I met many people who dislike me but also people who shared similar passion and vision.
If you want to see how I have been in GT5 days tuning and testing in FITT, and how I tried to fit in with ABS 1 tuners :
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...cores-posted-congrats-to-tuners.262891/page-9
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...-concept-challenge-praiano-wins.265574/page-7
Start from these pages or start from page 1 if you have spare time to waste
@OdeFinn , @danbojte @Thorin Cain @TurnLeft : You may be interested to see how GT5 days tuners sees ABS 0 driver/tuner/tester
The 60 40 460pp shootout was memorable, I tested tuners car with ABS 0 and you can see some tuners reaction to my test report :0
Well, shame on you!Were you stalking me Didn't know you were active back in GT5 days
Group D Test Results
Test method :
Tests were done using :
stick controller,
manual transmission,
no ABS and all other aids off
Grip = real
Steering sensitivity = 0
I gave each car 5 nonstop lap at each track
trackripper123 RUF RGT ’00
Autumn Ring 1:22.543
One of the best car I have driven at Autumn Ring, the car handles so well. I kept pushing hard, rarely the car would understeer on exits, the brakes worked so nice, even without ABS. I have one of the best 1st sector time at 28.056 seconds with this car. In my 5 lap run, not even once I went sideways. Gearing is evenly spaced, steering is responsive, the car shines on the s bends, lots of speed there. Great job.
High Speed Ring Reverse 1:12.146
The Ruf surprised me yet again, the car is very stable on high speed long curves, able to maintain speed with ease. The s bend can be taken with lots of speed, and it hardly exhibits any over or under steer. The only concern I have is the rather short 6th gear, I hit the rev limit on the straight reaching 160 mph for only a split second.
Drivers Choice Points: 8.5 out of 10
Jtqmopar Pontiac GTO 5.7 Coupe ’04
Autumn Ring 1:24.637
The car has potential to do better with only BB changes, it is well balanced with slight understeer when pushed hard out of a corner. The big drawback is lack of acceleration, even with such a short gearing. On some corners, 3rd or 4th gear can be used, as the 3rd felt too short, this is also the only car I have driven that use the 6th gear on the main straight. Braking is also one of it's weakness, not enough bite and I have some instability even when braking straight due to the default 5/5 BB used. The car almost never went oversteer except when braking hard, which is quite nice for an FR. ABS drivers should have less issue and have better time, maybe high 1:23, as my best lap has at least 2 heavy braking slides ( 1st corner and right hairpin after 2nd straight )
High Speed Ring Reverse 1:15.068
The short gearing really hurt this car, if only it has better spaced gearing, the Pontiac would have 1:14 easily. The car tops at a measly 147 mph on the main straight, stability on the 1st corner is not bad either, able to hold at least 123 mph with a smooth entry. Braking for the S bend is a hit and miss, most of my time lost in this section, 1:14.xxx definitely achievable.
Drivers Choice Points: 6 out of 10
HaoleHatingWRX Subaru Impreza STi ’10
Autumn Ring 1:23.104
I've never driven WRX that is as nimble as this, it weaves through the slalom and the chicane after the loop with brilliant accuracy. The suspension is quite stiff, it easily jumps and unsettled when riding over the rumble strip. 1st to 3rd gear acceleration is exceptional, but from 4th onwards, the acceleration is getting worse due to the heavy weight. This weight issue also affect the braking, I find the brake not up to the task, a higher brake number would do better. Mild understeer appears unexpected at times, sometimes I can push it hard out of a corner with no issue, other times it goes wide. Overall, a nice car to drive around the twisty bits. With more laps, I believe this car could easily do low 1:22 as my best time has so many room for improvement.
High Speed Ring Reverse 1:14.087
The WRX response very well when turning on the S bend and the right curve after the bridge, the only flaw this car has is the weight and a lack of acceleration on 5th and 6th gear even with the already short ratio. Top speed barely goes over 152 mph, the 2nd lowest I have encountered in the tests. The WRX also seems a bit unpredictable when entering high speed sweeping curve ( 1st corner ), I have to use some left foot braking to adjust speed smoothly, otherwise the car would loose to much speed or unable to turn smoothly - this is maybe just me.
Drivers Choice Points: 7 out of 10
Ugabugaz Lamborghini Miura P400 Bertone ’67
Autumn Ring 1:22.607
The time says it all, the beauty of perfection, the Miura gives me so much pleasure, the car point wherever you want it, the slalom is a joy to drive over, the loop is so easy to travel, point and squirt, even when the tires started pushed too hard, it will slide with finesse. Braking is almost perfect, a bit unstable at the rear, just a tiny more bite, it will be just right. I still can't believe how fast this car is, obviously 1:21 time is within reach.
High Speed Ring Reverse 1:11.752
The only car I have tested that still has great acceleration even on 5th gear, the Miura has tremendous speed topping at 162 mph on the main straight, maintaining high speed even when I enter a bit wide on the S bend. Braking after the tunnel is a bit tricky as the brake strength is severely lacking to my preference. My best run here has the 2nd sector at 39.xxx, another 0.1 second alone could be had on the 1st sector, a low 1:11.xxx is within range.
Drivers Choice Points: 9 out of 10
Digitalbaka Toyota FT-86 G Sports Concept ’10
Autumn Ring 1:23.708
How can I put this ... the FT86 handles well, but more often than not it goes wide when on corner exits. The rear tires grips like a glue, a rarity for an FR, but the front grip easily diminished when going full on exiting a turn. I have to be very careful with the throttle, especially during the slalom, the right curve, right hairpin and the loop. Acceleration wise, this car is great, able top reach 120mph+ before 1st corner, but the braking need more bite and it has too much rear bias which makes trail braking a real challenge. Overall, with a looser rear and nimble front ( less understeer ), this would be a perfect FR. The time could also be improved, 1:22 or lower with a perfect run, my 1:23.708 has quite a few corners with understeer, 1st corner slide and only 28.680 1st sector.
High Speed Ring Reverse 1:13.374
FT86 feels at home in this track, great speed and acceleration, able to hold 124 mph at the 1st turn and tops at 157 mph, the only trouble I have is braking after the tunnel, the car tends to lose rear balance and goes wide, hurting the lap time significantly, my guess with a smooth section here, 1:12 is easily achievable. Nice car overall.
Drivers Choice Points: 7 out of 10
Final Group Test Results
Test method :
Tests were done using :
stick controller,
manual transmission,
ABS:1 and all other aids off
Grip = real
Steering sensitivity = 0
I gave each car 5 nonstop lap at Grand Valley Speedway
Trackripper123 RUF RGT ’00
Time 2:03.734
I really like this RUF, 1st corner can be taken with confidence, I can brake as late as just right after 100m marker, the car is very stable and responsive when turning. Lift off the throttle when entering a corner will give the driver a pinpoint accuracy to adjust the direction or position, and with proper throttle control, understeer is a rarity. One of my favorite part when driving the RUF is at the tunnel before the bridge, the car react so well to the brake and throttle. I am pretty sure 2:02.xxx is achievable, and a side note, on the long right tunnel after the bridge, maintain careful brakes and gas, as the car is quite sensitive. Overall, a very nice tune, stable and easy to drive, bravo.
Drivers Choice Points: 9.5 out of 10
Rotary Junkie Mazda Atenza Sport 25Z '07
Time : 2:04.961
How do I start ? The car has a good balance, the front heavy and front wheel drive layout tend to go wide, but this one will hold the line very diligently as long as the throttle kept in check. The gearing is pretty short for this kind of track, but it's a trade off for it's weight. I like the car, great suspension tuning, neutral entry, sharp steering response and slight understeer when pressured hard, good job RJ.👍
Drivers Choice Points: 8.5 out of 10
Ugabugaz Lamborghini Miura P400 bertone '67 Gentleman's Olds
Time 2:04.137
The Miura, this is confusing for me, it feel fast, handles great, but the time is not as good as I expected, maybe I am just not a good driver. The car is tricky this time at GVS, it has quite noticeable understeer when exiting tight turns, and on the S bends before the tunnel, the rear lose grip easily, which cost me a lot of time. Steering and braking is great, while the car is very stiff, the only issue is when going over the rumble strip which will upset the car and losing precious time. Top speed is a bit on the low side, barely hitting 145mph+ before 1st turn. Overall, nice tune.
Drivers Choice Points: 9 out of 10
Motor City Hami Lotus Elise 111R '04
Time : 2:03.211
I can't believe this car is so fast in corners, very predictable, stable and easy to push hard. Lots of grip from the rear tires and the braking although a bit rear bias is very manageable. The car's light weight give it major advantage, shorter braking distance, higher velocity through the twisty, and sharp steering. I love it when going through the tight S bend after the long tunnel. This car is a great adversary to the RUF RGT. Amazing work MC Hami
Drivers Choice Points: 9.5 out of 10
Onboy123 Toyota MR2 Spyder '99
Time : 2:04.951
Onboy's car this time is different than the previous round, the car has quite erratic behavior, it has tendency to oversteer when trail braking on entry, and then slight understeer when exiting. The main issues here is the lack of stability on long curve like the tunnel before and after the bridge. Brake too late, and it slides, accelerate too early and it goes wide. Front grip is inadequate when changing direction in high speed, but steering response is good at lower speed turn. Braking is okay, but a bit twitchy on 1st corner. The good thing about this MR2 is that when it loses rear grip, it's gradual and easily controllable, almost like a stock MX5 More tuning will yield better handling and stability, but this car is quite an achievement without a rear aero and for such a short time to retune, I give Onboy
Drivers Choice Points: 7.9 out of 10
NewDriver2 Toyota MR2 G Limited '97
Time : 2:04.958
The MR2 has a good acceleration and top speed, the car is pretty good at exiting low speed corners. Tight rear differential means even wheel spin exiting a turn is quite easy to tame. Handling wise, the car has a weakness in high speed cornering, understeer could set in without warning, the front tires are a bit restless above 100mph, and also a bit unstable when changing direction. Braking is a hit and miss for me, 1st corner can be taken late, but often the rear give out grip too early, and throttle input needs to be gradual on long curve and S bends. A fast car indeed, but the instability hurt it's handling. A nice work nonetheless, SW20 MR2 is known to be quite wild even when stock.
Drivers Choice Points: 7.5 out of 10
Oh yeah, they have just ignored you for two post pages long... I was reading at your first quote here.but they are some nice folks
I've only been around GT Planet since 12th Jan 2014 but, like you, I've been playing since GT1 was a ground breaking game.2015 and 2016 is coming, I read these 2 old threads, the early days of me on GTP, so many didn't like me with my no ABS campaign, most of them are inactive today I have been playing GT since GT 1 in 1997, started tuning replicas from GT2 days ( when I also started to get deep in JDM tuning culture in real life ), but I started a repica garage recently in GT6 Long way, and I met many people who dislike me but also people who shared similar passion and vision.
If you want to see how I have been in GT5 days tuning and testing in FITT, and how I tried to fit in with ABS 1 tuners :
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...cores-posted-congrats-to-tuners.262891/page-9
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...-concept-challenge-praiano-wins.265574/page-7
Start from these pages or start from page 1 if you have spare time to waste
@OdeFinn , @danbojte @Thorin Cain @TurnLeft : You may be interested to see how GT5 days tuners sees ABS 0 driver/tuner/tester
The 60 40 460pp shootout was memorable, I tested tuners car with ABS 0 and you can see some tuners reaction to my test report :0
I've only been around GT Planet since 12th Jan 2014 but, like you, I've been playing since GT1 was a ground breaking game.
I've only just started tuning since meeting a wide variety of members here and have taken part in two FITT competitions.
Prior to that, my 'tuning' only extended as far as adjusting gear ratios and wing levels without understanding how the increased downforce would affect the suspension. If I didn't like the balance a car gave me, I would change tyre compounds to enhance the balance in my favour although that didn't always work when tyre wear was a factor.
I've said it before & im saying again, Ridox, your tunes make a lot of sense because you go into great detail about why a change or setting has been made. To know what the tuner is thinking and why they've set a car a certain way is like sitting in a class you're interested in with a teacher you like & respect. How could you not learn something in that scenario?
Keep up the great work & forget about the knockers. Most are long gone & some refuse to listen or understand.
You can't preach to the know it all.
( when I also started to get deep in JDM tuning culture in real life )
I would be interested in some background information about that. What car do you own. Are doing the work on it by yourself? What mods do you have installed? I hope that's not too much to ask about
I must admit you sounded like top level cop baitI lived in Australia ( Sydney ) for around 10 years, one of my car was R33 GTS-T Series II ( 1997 ) with Blitz mods ( Exhaust, suspension, bov ), HKS intake, intercooler, Nismo strut bars, Exedy twin plate clutch, Veilside 18" wheels ( 235/40 front, 265/35 rear ), Trampio tires, and 98 octane fuel ( she doesn't like any less ). That was the better days of my youth wild night life, some street racing as well. I changed cars many times and have driven almost all kinds of JDM cars imported to Oz ( Supras, Skylines, Evos, FTO, GTO, Pulsar GTiR, Starlet GT Turbo, Integra, Prelude etc ) as I have many friends from garages and imports owner. Drove R32 GTR for about a month, taking care of it for a friend once
I usually do most of simple works, like changing oil, brake pads, suspension tuning ( damper, alignment ), maintenance ( tires, wheels, underbody, interior ), and basic ECU / electronics ( Apexi PowerFC, boost controller, etc )
My old man was in car business ( buy and sell used cars ), which gave me car experience since about 10 years old, drove for the 1st time when I was 13 I think, Toyota Corona Sedan ( 1980 model ). My first car was Peugeot 505 GTi 2.2 ( 1989 model ), my 1st JDM driving experience was a white Mitsubishi Eterna/Galant VR4 owned by a relative, went 200+kmh on a highway early in the morning, hit redline on 5th gear, scary then the next one was when my dad acquaintance was asking help to sell a Lancer Evo GSR I with rally themed mod ( roll cage, upgraded brakes-stock was very weak, stripped interior, Tein coilover, 280+PS ) complete with Ralliart livery Had a go around town for a 30 minutes, was crazy, the exhaust was so loud, the clutch was heavy, the idle was rough, and the boost was mad I was only 16 with no driver licence.
I must admit you sounded like top level cop bait
The police in my State of Victoria have been given a 'don't chase' order unless public life is in immediate danger so all the young hoons are doing what they like & if a cop car appears, they drop the hammer & speed off.
I miss the Pulsar Gti-R from GT whatever it was. Great car except for the interwarmer sitting on top of the motor.
I'm sure you took real good care of the R32
Were you here when you drove the '80 Corona? I'm pretty sure they were the ones with the Holden motor. Holden called it the Starfire 4 whereas those in the know nicknamed it the Missfire 4. Fair dinkum, that engine was a Holden 6 with two cylinders chopped off the block and wouldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding!
What are you steering these days?
Ah huh! So your FTO mate is one of the reasons our insurance premiums are higher than they have to be. Silly man.
I see an FTO every now and then & they do have a nice exhaust note to them.
If you drive a slow people mover, one of which I've never heard of before, I can only guess you are living in the land of the people mover. That being the US of A? Maybe Japan?
On another note, I've managed to see a few episodes of Best Motoring recently & although I don't have the first clue about Japanese language, they're a good show to watch.
One was teaching a rookie how to drift properly and the other episode was a 3-lap race around Sugo to decide the best JDM of 2001.
R34 vs Evo 7 vs STi vs NSX Type S vs RX-7. R34 win from Evo with RX-7 a distant last.