I just love testing all the cars in Forza 4 on the Sedona 1 mile drag strip and for the most part, I think the cars' acceleration, launch etc is pretty darn close to reality. However, some 1 mile times have me scratching my head and thinking "Really? Such and such a car would really beat that one, would it?"
Example: an Audi RS4 '06 is quicker than a BMW M5 E60 '09 by about .7 of a second. The RS4 posts a 31.6 time and the M5 posts a 32.3 time.
Ok, I understand the reason is because the Audi has AWD and so theoretically has a better launch than the RWD BM. However, since their 0-60 times are pretty much identical (4.6/4.7 seconds) and with the BM having a higher top speed and more hp, surely once both cars pass 60, the edge would go to the M5? Or am I wrong?
Yes, I realise that in order to get a better launch with RWD cars, sometimes you have to experiment but there's no way I can get it to beat the RS4. I've tried it dozens of times in slightly different ways and 32.3 is the max. Would this be true in reality do you think?
Example: an Audi RS4 '06 is quicker than a BMW M5 E60 '09 by about .7 of a second. The RS4 posts a 31.6 time and the M5 posts a 32.3 time.
Ok, I understand the reason is because the Audi has AWD and so theoretically has a better launch than the RWD BM. However, since their 0-60 times are pretty much identical (4.6/4.7 seconds) and with the BM having a higher top speed and more hp, surely once both cars pass 60, the edge would go to the M5? Or am I wrong?
Yes, I realise that in order to get a better launch with RWD cars, sometimes you have to experiment but there's no way I can get it to beat the RS4. I've tried it dozens of times in slightly different ways and 32.3 is the max. Would this be true in reality do you think?