- 1,099
- Texas
- Whiskey345ci
If you call the bored-up 2L, 4sylinder inline TT engine (Used on the Toyota Supra JGTC) the same as a 3L 6sylinder inline TT. They may be built upon many of the same principals but they are still different. If you don't belive me check the specks on the Top Secret GT300 Supra, a "roadgoing" car approved for JGTC by the head of that leage. 2.2L there, not 3L or more.
Found this while I was searching for something to back up what I allready knew:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_GT#GT300
This states this: "Regulations in GT500 are considerably looser than most GT classifications, and teams are free to change engines with other models made by the manufacturer, change the alignment of the engine, or add forced-induction systems to models which do not normally have it. The chassis may also be heavily modified, with lightweight tube-frame "clips" being allowed forward and back of the main cockpit, although the car must overall look similar to its road-going variant. These regulations result in cars which are possibly the fastest GT racing cars in the world. The rationale for this was to allow manufacturers to field competitive cars without having to spend large amounts of money for homologation versions of the race car's road car counterparts (although some companies, notably Honda and Nissan, have still developed homologation specials)."
Note: At the top of the page youve directed me to its states "This articles does not cite any references or sources." Which brings me to the point that anyone could have created it. Which makes it totally irrelevant next to the official statements distributed from the official JGTC.
I got my information off the actual official SuperGT site. Ive also watched documents were drivers like Keiichi Tsuchiya state "it is the factory frame and engine block" not that the official guide to JGTC DVD matters (sarcasm). Motorsports is one of my career fields so ive none these things before the internet came about. Also cant anyone right up a wikipedia article, and doesnt it allow you to correct someone there if there article isnt 100% accurate? I see many bad inaccuracies can go a long way ex. (you believe it and encourage others to). I also think theres a page on wikipedia were they state that there articles may not bee 100% accurate. But these documents I stated before are the 2008 restrictions and requirements from an official source (the actaul website of JGTC) so theres nothing else I need to say concerning the topic. Im sorry if it seems that you my have waist your time with this, but with me if it doesnt come straight from the source its irrelevant.