- 29,938
- Thailand
I wasn’t having a dig. Simply commenting about my confusion with work simulators.I can't fathom why other people do lots of things as hobbies, that doesn't mean they are wasting their time and money as you seem to be implying
I wasn’t having a dig. Simply commenting about my confusion with work simulators.I can't fathom why other people do lots of things as hobbies, that doesn't mean they are wasting their time and money as you seem to be implying
Simply put, instant gratification with no physical labour.If you went to a garage and offered them free labour to fix cars, you’d still be financially better off.
I can’t fathom why anyone would buy a work simulator.
Is it ‘lectric?
Is it 🤬Is it ‘lectric?
Wood burner?Is it 🤬
About as far away from it as you can get, in fact.
Wind powered is my guess. Like a yacht but with wheels.Wood burner?
Wood burner?
You just shovel money into the fuel tank. It craps out so much carbon they had to invent a new tax bracket for it. In fact it's truly mystifying Mazda sold any of them in the UK, much more so that they sold 1,196 of them.Wind powered is my guess. Like a yacht but with wheels.
I guess I'll look at some "Hot Wheel" cars as that's all I got money for!I feel left out. I’ve been car hunting for months and found nothing suitable.
Is it the 2.3 turbo?You just shovel money into the fuel tank. It craps out so much carbon they had to invent a new tax bracket for it. In fact it's truly mystifying Mazda sold any of them in the UK, much more so that they sold 1,196 of them
They have a solution for that too.I wasn’t having a dig. Simply commenting about my confusion with work simulators.
Yup!Is it the 2.3 turbo?
That's...honestly amazing. I don't know if I should laugh or be concerned, but it's amazing nonetheless.It craps out so much carbon they had to invent a new tax bracket for it.
Does it have the cool kid's backwards-facing third row?Well, just picked up another old car from my childhood I've always wanted. This will sit well in the driveway with my Volvo 240 and C6 haha.
Any plans for a wood panel upgrade?View attachment 1074396Well, just picked up another old car from my childhood I've always wanted. This will sit well in the driveway with my Volvo 240 and C6 haha.
Haha. Na. If it was a Buick Roadmaster maybe but I like the way it looks right now.Any plans for a wood panel upgrade?
Apparently never used. The super old couple I bought it from never had kid's so they never used them!Does it have the cool kid's backwards-facing third row?
I’m mainly struggling to find something because my budget is rather low.I guess I'll look at some "Hot Wheel" cars as that's all I got money for!
Do you think it comes with Tankdozer?
It's a mild exaggerationThat's...honestly amazing. I don't know if I should laugh or be concerned, but it's amazing nonetheless.
As an almost more stupid situation with the tax brackets, on my S4 the auto (7spd DSG) is £340 a year to tax, but the manual version (6spd) is in the same bracket as your CX-7, so I save £245 a year! [/ManMaths]It's a mild exaggeration
In essence, the UK's "road tax" (which wasn't really a tax for the roads, it was just a name) was the same for every car up to about 1999. Then they introduced a lower rate for cars with engines under 1.1 litres, which lasted until 2001.
In 2001 they introduced a new system; cars registered before March 2001 were still in two different engine categories (under 1.55, 1.55 and over), but anything registered after that went into an emissions banding system. That meant that the lower your car's homologated CO2 emissions, the less you paid. The lowest band, band A, was for cars producing 100g/km CO2 or less, and the rate was £0. The highest was band G for cars over 225g/km.
That lasted until 2008, when the government decided to change the bands from 7 to 13 and - somewhat uncharitably - backdated the change to March 2006. The new bands ran from A (0) to K (226g/km and above) from cars registered from March 2001 to March 2006, with additional bands L (226-255) and M (256+) for cars registered from April 2006 onwards.
Mazda had introduced the CX-7 to the UK, exclusively as a petrol turbo, in September 2007, which meant that the first owners got away with paying Band G (though it was £400/y) in the first year, but subsequently the car fell into Band L at £415/y in 2008, and then £430/y in 2009. Rates have consistently gone up year on year, and it currently sits - as I well know - at £585/y.
So in effect the UK introduced a new tax band after the CX-7 was launched, backdated to apply to before the car's launch, so I'm mildly exaggerating when I say they had to make a new tax bracket for it, but not much
Unpredictably, that completely killed sales. They sold under 1,200 of them (just under 700 remain registered and licensed, with just over 100 more registered but declared off the road) in three years, before withdrawing it and introducing a replacement 2.2-litre diesel which had 100hp less and was half the cost to tax.
243g/km, for reference (equivalent to 26.9mpg). On my blast home in it, I got 29.9mpg before I gave it a little handling test on my traditional final leg of the journey (it did well enough), and that dropped to 29.5mpg. Considering the handling test route is four miles and the rest of the journey was 270 miles, that 0.4mpg drop is a slight hint that the throttle is a money-burning device.