Slice of down-under for GT5

  • Thread starter ls2_297
  • 62 comments
  • 3,500 views
throttlehappy
boring?
adelaide, eastern creek, barbagallo, oran park, symmons plains and philip island are anything but boring

I find them boring, nothing about them that makes me think they should go to extra effort to put in, Adelaide is just a maze a walls that the V8 mice make their way through. (btw I live in Adelaide and have been to the race on a few occasions)


JohnBM01
VIPERGTSR01, that was one of the primary criticisms I would have given Australian V8 courses at first.

Part of the problem in this case is not the courses but the V8's...... a two make race, how disappointing. (I wish we could go back to pre 1993 type rules in terms of Australian touring cars, oh and not to mention sprint races 👎) (btw I have driven the tracks in V8 Supercars games)


Overall Bathurst itself is a must, any more Australian tracks is a bonus, I would take Bathurst over 10 other Australian tracks combined.
 
I still think that Australia needs some unique courses in GT5. Bathurst is pretty much a must, but I also imagine fantasy street courses. I'd get in Sydney if PD were to pursue this. I would likely go to the extent of some Australian rally action. I don't know Australian rally too well, but I all I know is that there are some wicked jumps and tight corners.

If PD gets in Bathurst, IMMEDIATELY look to a Bathurst 1000 event. We can make it Holden and Ford Australia only, since these are the two groups who can't seem to settle their differences all these years. I don't know if a Bathurst 24 Hour event would work in GT5.

One last note. Playing "ToCA Race Driver 3," is it just me, or do the Ford Falcons sound much sweeter and more throaty than the Holdens? I just have a wonderful liking of that Australian V8 Supercar roar! GT4's variant with the Ford Falcon XR8 is not a bad try.
 
VIPERGTSR01
I find them boring, nothing about them that makes me think they should go to extra effort to put in, Adelaide is just a maze a walls that the V8 mice make their way through. (btw I live in Adelaide and have been to the race on a few occasions)




Part of the problem in this case is not the courses but the V8's...... a two make race, how disappointing. (I wish we could go back to pre 1993 type rules in terms of Australian touring cars, oh and not to mention sprint races 👎) (btw I have driven the tracks in V8 Supercars games)


Overall Bathurst itself is a must, any more Australian tracks is a bonus, I would take Bathurst over 10 other Australian tracks combined.

i disagree, adelaide is a very challenging technical circuit and well worth being included. id hardly call over 600 horse v8s mice by the way :odd:

as for it being a 2 make race theres a hell of alot of people who dont share your dissappointment
 
JohnBM01
I still think that Australia needs some unique courses in GT5. Bathurst is pretty much a must, but I also imagine fantasy street courses. I'd get in Sydney if PD were to pursue this. I would likely go to the extent of some Australian rally action. I don't know Australian rally too well, but I all I know is that there are some wicked jumps and tight corners.

If PD gets in Bathurst, IMMEDIATELY look to a Bathurst 1000 event. We can make it Holden and Ford Australia only, since these are the two groups who can't seem to settle their differences all these years. I don't know if a Bathurst 24 Hour event would work in GT5.

One last note. Playing "ToCA Race Driver 3," is it just me, or do the Ford Falcons sound much sweeter and more throaty than the Holdens? I just have a wonderful liking of that Australian V8 Supercar roar! GT4's variant with the Ford Falcon XR8 is not a bad try.

dont know about the sound mate but i know one thing
the holdens are defianetly faster :lol:

the xr8 supercar is a great car to drive, one of my favorites. pity its the butt ugly au :grumpy:
so what is your fastest lap on bathurst?
 
I haven't kept track of my Bathurst times. Plus, I haven't raced it too much in Simulation Mode or Simulation Mode - Time Trial. So I can't tell you my best time. I also, thus can't provide an idea as to how fast the V8 Supercars go through Bathurst. I will say that lap times are probably between 1:45 to 2:00.
 
JohnBM01
I haven't kept track of my Bathurst times. Plus, I haven't raced it too much in Simulation Mode or Simulation Mode - Time Trial. So I can't tell you my best time. I also, thus can't provide an idea as to how fast the V8 Supercars go through Bathurst. I will say that lap times are probably between 1:45 to 2:00.

well the time to beat is 1.45
there is no way in hell you can beat that time with pro simulation settings on, which i always have on. pro simulation should be default if you ask me. my best so far is 2.04.45 and theres room for improvement, id say 1 1/2 to 2 seconds. the thing with bathurst is you could be having your best lap but if you dont nail the twists and turns coming down the mountain it all goes to ****.
very enjoyable. add other cars to this and change the difficulty to hard and youve got one hell of a race!
 
A must would have to be Albert Park. Melbournes Formula 1 track. I'd love to take one of the PD F1 cars and race it around there for a time attack. If we are talking about real aussie cars, then the ute/pickup versions must be included too. Remember guys, Real Aussies Drive Utes. :)

DSCN0051.JPG


fpvf6tornadosuperpursui6wn.jpg


b0332ab.jpg
 
throttlehappy
i disagree, adelaide is a very challenging technical circuit and well worth being included. id hardly call over 600 horse v8s mice by the way :odd:

as for it being a 2 make race theres a hell of alot of people who dont share your dissappointment

Adelaide is challenging because those damn 90 degree corners and walls, not an interesting way to make a track challenging IMO, Bathurst with its hills and undulations make the track interesting. As for the mice comment I was referring the V8 at Adelaide are like mice trying to find away out of the maze (you know mice maze).

I am aware there is alot of people that don't share my disappointment but many of them were never into Australian Touring cars prior to 1993 to see what Touring cars could have been like now, the current series could be so much better than it is, but most don't know any better.

Remember the 24hour production car races? Now that was awesome but was canned. Probably for stepping on V8 Supercars toes.
 
I am aware there is alot of people that don't share my disappointment but many of them were never into Australian Touring cars prior to 1993 to see what Touring cars could have been like now, the current series could be so much better than it is, but most don't know any better.

Remember the 24hour production car races? Now that was awesome but was canned. Probably for stepping on V8 Supercars toes.
CAMS and Channel 7 certainly knew what Australian Touring Car Racing was like prior to 1993, that's why they scrapped Group A. Grids were down, attendances were down and TV ratings were down. The British Touring Car Championship scrapped Group A for the 1991 season and introduced the Super Tourer era effectivley getting rid of the Sierra and Skyline. The DTM got rid of Group A for the 1994 season in favour of a 2.5 litre class. The Japanese Touring Car Championship also dropped Group A for the 1994 season in favour of Super Tourers. The Australian Touring Car Championship dropped Group A for the 1993 season in favour of a V8 formula. There was no conspiracy to get rid of the Skyline because they were too fast, there was a world-wide realisation that Group A was not working.

The reason the Bathurst 24 hour died was because Ross Palmer had had enough of pouring his own millions of dollars into PROCAR over it's ten year existence, so he pulled the funds from the championship and the PROCAR run Bathurst 24hr. All the categories that were a part of PROCAR still exist and compete in their own championships, some of them now with different marketing teams but all categories have survived. It is a pity that the 24hr race was not picked up by someone but it was only as recent as late last year that some parties were interested in reviving the race. V8 Supercars had nothing to do with the demise of PROCAR or the Bathurst 24hr.
 
I could cetainly see the distaste for the GTR's from drivers and crowd in the 1991 & 1992 Bathurst races, after Sierra then GTR multiple victorys and the drivers and crowds obvious attitude toward the imports I'm not suprised really that attendance was down and CAMS changed it all around.

I just wish V8 Supercars would open up some room for different makes and models (different engines and drivetrains) to enter the race, would make it much more interesting for me at least.

BTW just curious, a question that sounds like you would know the answer. Why did the 1992 R32 GTR's have a weight restriction that even led to court cases? (being lighter than the 1991 GTR's)
 
I could cetainly see the distaste for the GTR's from drivers and crowd in the 1991 & 1992 Bathurst races, after Sierra then GTR multiple victorys and the drivers and crowds obvious attitude toward the imports I'm not suprised really that attendance was down and CAMS changed it all around.
We haven't had a Ford victory at Bathurst since 1998 but the crowds aren't down and CAMS don't feel they need to change things.
I just wish V8 Supercars would open up some room for different makes and models (different engines and drivetrains) to enter the race, would make it much more interesting for me at least.
V8 Supercars isn't exclusivley for Holden and Ford. In the last six years or so Toyota and Mitsubishi have shown interest. The rules say the V8 Supercar must be based on an Australian built four door sedan but I'm sure if Audi or Mercedes/Chrysler, for instance, showed an interest in V8 Supercars that rule would disappear pretty quickly. When you start introducing different drivetrains and engines is when you get uneven competition. These days there must be tighter regulations to keep all the competitors reasonably competitive or the sponsors and fans will lose interest.
BTW just curious, a question that sounds like you would know the answer. Why did the 1992 R32 GTR's have a weight restriction that even led to court cases? (being lighter than the 1991 GTR's)
The 1992 cars were heavier than the 1991 cars. The legal action didn't eventuate as Gibson Motorsport backed down. Here is a bit of information I found a long time ago. I can't remember where I found it and can't be effed trying to find it now. It is an interesting read if you find the whole lot as it goes through the results of the R32 GTR in Australia.

October 89
The Skylines weight is 1260kg, heavier than the Ford RS500 Sierra at 1185kg. Fred Gibson expects to get 600hp, more than the HR31 GTS-R's RB20DET-R which pushed out 460hp in 1989, and 370hp in 1988.

April 90

At testing at Winton, the engine used was a unit sent over from Japan. It used a Japanese management system which restricted boost to 1.3 bar and power was about 550hp. The Gibson Motorsport team intended to replace the Japanese management system with their own system and run higher boost, around 1.5 bar for 580hp.

January 1991

A bit of background is needed here as the 1993 rule change was essentially influenced by these events and conditions.

CAMS was in trouble. It was running out of money, and needed restructuring. To compound the issue, there was a general downturn in the economy. CAMS responded by charging large registration fees of AU$6,000 per car for the ATCC, and tracks were charged AU$10,000 to host a round. In addition, because the Group A format was administered by FISA in Europe, the regulations were hard to work with. This had caused delays in getting the new VN Group A Commodore homologated for competition

The rules were revised for the 1991 season aiming to keep the fields even. The Sierras had 85kg removed from their minimum weight, bringing them down to 1,100kg. They also got a six speed gearbox. The Commodores also lost some weight, 75kg down to 1250kg and a host of freedoms including the entire inlet system, the valves and ports were free, and the inner wheel guards could be modified to fit wider tyres. The BMW M3 was allowed to run similar freedoms as the Commodores, at a featherweight 960kg. The GT-R had it's minimum weight increased to 1360kg. (the reporting of weights is not consistent, the homologation weight of the GT-R was 1260kg, yet the press report an increase of 35kg from 1325kg. Go figure).

April 1991

Minimum weights are further revised with an across the board increase of 2.5% in all cars. This was done so the private teams didn't have to resort to expensive exotic materials to reach the same weights as the factory teams.

The season looked like being a difficult one, the entries were well down with a core group of 12 cars contesting all rounds and very small fields. Even at this stage there was talk of making a full grid at Bathurst by allowing the standard Group E production cars to join the Group A race.

June 91

Early June saw a series of options from the CAMS motor racing commission to nobble the GT-R for 1992. Among the recommendations were ideas such as forcing the cars to run in rear wheel drive only, to put restrictors in front of the turbos like the WRC cars or to reduce the tyre width. Not surprisingly, Gibson Motorsport and Nissan threatened legal action. CAMS then asked Gibson to produce a counter proposal to bring the GT-R's performance back to the rest of the field.

According to reports at the time, Gibson had been testing the various options. At Wanneroo the air restrictors were in place for the qualifying, but not the race. They also tested the car in rear wheel drive mode with the front drive shafts removed. Lap times at Winton were 2 seconds slower with the 2WD.

The entry list for Bathurst is released. There is a full field of 57 entries without resorting to padding out the entry list with the Group E production cars. There is a media and test day at Bathurst. Some of the leading teams appear including the Gibson team. Jim Richards cleans up the test day with the fastest lap (2:14.95s) and reaching 299kph on Conrod Straight. Win Percy almost matches with 297kph in his Commodore.

September 91

The Sandown 500 saw some of the major teams missing. The Gibson GT-Rs and the Dick Johnson team didn't enter.

October 91

In the background during the Bathurst race week, there were moves being made about the rules for 1993. Because of the economic situation and the ever increasing costs of running a Group A car, CAMS had moved to develop a new formula for Australia's leading category. The aim of the category was to provide close racing with a substantially lower cost than the current Group A scheme.

It was eventually decided that the new formula would revolve around the Holden Commodore and the Ford Falcon. At the time Australia lacked the technology to develop 2 litre engines like those used in the British Touring Car Championship and it was decided that turbos were too costly for many teams to run. Both the Sierra RS500 and Skyline GT-R were costing around AU$500,000 for a competitive car. That kind of cost was well beyond most of the privateer teams. The V8 was the cheapest option to develop and race in Australia.

Holden and Ford took the unprecedented step of releasing a joint letter to CAMS during Bathurst telling them to get their act together and set the rules for 1993 or Holden and Ford would consider other forms of racing (NASCAR / AUSCAR).

January 92

The Nissan GT-R had a new minimum weight of 1400 kg, a boost restriction to 1.3 bar which was calculated to cut the power to 336kw down from 477kw, along with a limit on compression to 9.5:1. The Commodores and Sierras were given an extra 50kg and an electronic rev limit of 7,500 rpm. This was designed to cut costs as the top tier Commodore teams were using 8,500 rpm in an effort to keep up with the Sierras which resulted in many broken engines. In contrast, the BMW M3s copped an extra 60kg. A CAMS performance review panel was formed to make running changes to the regulations during the series.

May 1992

Round five of the ATCC was at Lakeside in Queensland. The CAMS Performance review panel had been working hard since the previous round. They loaded the Sierras with an additional 50kg and punished the Skylines with 100kg of additional weight to carry around. Mark Skaife claimed that the GT-R was now the heaviest touring car in the world, and that in endurance race trim (full load of fuel, water brakes etc.) the GT-R would weigh in at 1,700kg. Fred Gibson threatened to withdraw the cars from Bathurst, claiming the extra weight was making wheels crack. The GIO team went as far as to withdraw their GT-R and bring last years Commodore out from the chicken shed, as they were cracking wheels with their heavy GT-R and had to wait for some new stronger wheels to be made.

June 92

Fred Gibson then set about work to try and level the playing field for the Bathurst event. He made a submission to CAMS to have the weight and boost penalties removed, arguing that the cars would be highly stressed with the additional weight they were forced to carry. CAMS turned down his submission forcing Fred had to play tougher. He threatened legal action against CAMS under the trade Practices Act unless they reviewed the weight penalties and also suggested the team not turn up to Bathurst (which was unlikely as it is the biggest event of the year). Bob Forbes, the owner of the GIO team stood by Gibson in solidarity. He would also pull the team's GT-R from Bathurst if Gibson pulled his team out. CAMS called their bluff and no legal action occurred. The GT-Rs would race at Bathurst with their 1,500kg minimum weight and the 1.3 bar pop-off valve limiting boost.

August 92

August had a media 'test day' at Bathurst, with many of the leading teams bringing their cars along. Fred Gibson was asked what specification his GT-Rs were running, he replied: “No comment.” Skaife cryptically admitted “We are not down at the Oran Park weight, but we're not down at last year's weight.” It was observed they were not running with the 1.3 bar pop-off installed.
 
Bathurst is a 'must-have' for GT5. Ranks with Nordschlieffe as possibly the most exciting track anywhere. Just like the 'ring it's an accident waiting to happen. Can't wait.
 
Schrodes
We haven't had a Ford victory at Bathurst since 1998 but the crowds aren't down and CAMS don't feel they need to change things.

V8 Supercars isn't exclusivley for Holden and Ford. In the last six years or so Toyota and Mitsubishi have shown interest. The rules say the V8 Supercar must be based on an Australian built four door sedan but I'm sure if Audi or Mercedes/Chrysler, for instance, showed an interest in V8 Supercars that rule would disappear pretty quickly. When you start introducing different drivetrains and engines is when you get uneven competition. These days there must be tighter regulations to keep all the competitors reasonably competitive or the sponsors and fans will lose interest.

The 1992 cars were heavier than the 1991 cars. The legal action didn't eventuate as Gibson Motorsport backed down. Here is a bit of information I found a long time ago. I can't remember where I found it and can't be effed trying to find it now. It is an interesting read if you find the whole lot as it goes through the results of the R32 GTR in Australia.[\quote]

See I'm different to many other people, I'm more interested in the cars than I am about close racing, If one team has an advantage due to a better setup/configured car, then I would like to see the other teams/manufactures do some engineering to keep up pace, I understand they limitations need to be in place for safely reasons and the expense, but I would like to see a watered down version of this at least.

Many other racing series have more than only acouple domestic manufactures and Imports but still have close driver races that do well. I understand attendance is great for V8 Supercars and CAMS wouldn't want to risk that with changes. I really do hope Toyota or Mitsubishi join in but I don't see it happening.

Thanks for the 89-92 info :)

Seems like the GTR's were fighting restrictions from the start, even if CAMS didn't introduce the 5.0L class the GTR's hit hard with even more restictions it seems.
The Nissan GT-R had a new minimum weight of 1400 kg, a boost restriction to 1.3 bar which was calculated to cut the power to 336kw down from 477kw, along with a limit on compression to 9.5:1

They loaded the Sierras with an additional 50kg and punished the Skylines with 100kg of additional weight to carry around. Mark Skaife claimed that the GT-R was now the heaviest touring car in the world, and that in endurance race trim (full load of fuel, water brakes etc.) the GT-R would weigh in at 1,700kg

Wow, I'm suprised they still did so well.
 
Utes would be a lovely pickup, but Brute Utes would be better (in addition to road-going Utes of course). Us Americans have had the Chevrolet El Camino and the Ford Ranchero, but there are plenty of Utes down in Australia that would be a very nice pickup. Keep in mind that I mean "pickup" as in "pick up," not pickup trucks in this sense.

They would be just as interesting to have in GT5 as traditional pickup trucks. But make the mix for road-going utes and racing utes.
 
JohnBM01
Utes would be a lovely pickup, but Brute Utes would be better (in addition to road-going Utes of course). Us Americans have had the Chevrolet El Camino and the Ford Ranchero, but there are plenty of Utes down in Australia that would be a very nice pickup. Keep in mind that I mean "pickup" as in "pick up," not pickup trucks in this sense.

They would be just as interesting to have in GT5 as traditional pickup trucks. But make the mix for road-going utes and racing utes.

dont forget drift utes :)
a maloo drifting against a tornado...oh baby :drool:
 
See I'm different to many other people, I'm more interested in the cars than I am about close racing, If one team has an advantage due to a better setup/configured car, then I would like to see the other teams/manufactures do some engineering to keep up pace, I understand they limitations need to be in place for safely reasons and the expense, but I would like to see a watered down version of this at least.
But you aren't different to other people. There are plenty of other people, myself included, that want to watch a race where the grid is full of different cars. The Production Touring Car Championship is full of different cars as is the Performance Car Championship, the Australian GT Championship and Historic Touring Cars. I watch and follow the V8 Supercar Series for what it is, a series that attracts Australia's best drivers and best teams racing on Australia's best tracks with 620 horsepower fire breathing V8s that are evenly matched to get the best out of the drivers. I no longer care that they are a silhouette car that have nothing but the floorpan, panels, dashboard, headlights and taillights in common with the cars they are based on.
Stone Brothers Racing have had the best setup/configured car in the championship for three years and it is up to the other teams to engineer their car to catch up. You said "...If one team has an advantage due to a better setup/configured car, then I would like to see the other teams/manufactures do some engineering to keep up pace,...". If we are talking about Group A, you would have to remove the "setup/configured" part of the quote because once a team has a better car, no amount of setup, configuration changes or re-engineering can make an inferior car beat a superior car. To change what they had to race with, the teams had to go back to the manufacturer, tell them what needed updating and the manufacturer had to build a certain number of cars with the update for public sale just so the race teams could have a quicker car. This was called homologation and was a very expensive exercise.
I would prefer to see a wider variety of cars in V8 Supercars but keep the V8 formula, decrease the wing size, use the same type of suspension, mechanicals and engine the road car uses or find a suitable engine from the 'family' for the racing car and allow coupes so we can get cars like the Camaro and Mustang back.
 
Schrodes
we are talking about Group A, you would have to remove the "setup/configured" part of the quote because once a team has a better car, no amount of setup, configuration changes or re-engineering can make an inferior car beat a superior car. To change what they had to race with, the teams had to go back to the manufacturer, tell them what needed updating and the manufacturer had to build a certain number of cars with the update for public sale just so the race teams could have a quicker car. This was called homologation and was a very expensive exercise.


Thats exactly what I was refering to, you want to beat the GTR, then build a road car to homologate with the configuration to win.... Expensive.. Oh yes. I understand the business against this but this is how I would like it. (obviously some rules and restrictions may be needed) but I am well aware this will not happen, especially with V8 Supercars currently being so popular.

Road cars is my number one passion then the race cars built directly off these cars. .

Schrodes
I would prefer to see a wider variety of cars in V8 Supercars but keep the V8 formula, decrease the wing size, use the same type of suspension, mechanicals and engine the road car uses or find a suitable engine from the 'family' for the racing car and allow coupes so we can get cars like the Camaro and Mustang back.

Thats great all good ideas, I would be very happy for just this to happen, anything to get the current series out of the boring rut (in my opinion) its currently in.

I pretty much only watch Bathurst and Adelaide races form V8 Supercars anymore.
Bathurst because the track is so great and its not a sprint race.
Adelaide because it is my home race and its not a sprint race. (plus I may even be at this race)
 
Drifting Utes? Other than American drifter "Bubba Drift" in Formula D, there is Robbie Bolger in Drift Australia and his drifting... I guess it's a Holden. Read about R. Bolger here: { http://www.driftaustralia.com.au/drivers.asp } You will have to use your Find capability to go straight down to Robbie Bolger on this site.

I hope I'm not offending anybody, but we usually think of Australian V8 Supercars in regards to Australian motorsport much like many think of NASCAR in American motorsport. I usually say that Australia is a little of America and a little of Europe. That is because the Holdens and Fords are mean machines with some great horsepower. The Holden/Ford Australia rivalry has been a long-running feud, much like Chevrolet/Ford here in the States. Not a lot of people know what Australian racing is like other than the V8 Supercars. And I'm talking about Australian-based series, not international series competing in Australia. While I think the Australian V8 Supercars is a wonderful series, I do wish I can know more about Australian motorsport other than names the likes of David Brabham(Australian?), Peter Brock, Craig Lowndes, Mark Skaife, Mark Webber, and many others I haven't mentioned. I wanted to talk more about this, but ran out of ideas at this moment. So I'll move on.

You like Brute Utes? Here's their official website: { http://www.v8utes.com.au }. I'll tell you what. I'd rather race these things than the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series. Road-going Utes and Brute Utes would be just as sweet as taking trucks out for a little Gran Turismo drive. Either that, or just give Americans the Chevrolet El Camino and Ford Ranchero. Or put both features in GT5 to make it an America/Australia challenge. I'd actually like to see something similar to an American Muscle vs. Australian Muscle in GT5. Bring back the international rivalries like in GT1 (USA vs. Japan, Japan vs. UK, UK vs. USA) and expand them to include some more international action.
 
JohnBM01
Drifting Utes? Other than American drifter "Bubba Drift" in Formula D, there is Robbie Bolger in Drift Australia and his drifting... I guess it's a Holden. Read about R. Bolger here: { http://www.driftaustralia.com.au/drivers.asp } You will have to use your Find capability to go straight down to Robbie Bolger on this site.

I hope I'm not offending anybody, but we usually think of Australian V8 Supercars in regards to Australian motorsport much like many think of NASCAR in American motorsport. I usually say that Australia is a little of America and a little of Europe. That is because the Holdens and Fords are mean machines with some great horsepower. The Holden/Ford Australia rivalry has been a long-running feud, much like Chevrolet/Ford here in the States. Not a lot of people know what Australian racing is like other than the V8 Supercars. And I'm talking about Australian-based series, not international series competing in Australia. While I think the Australian V8 Supercars is a wonderful series, I do wish I can know more about Australian motorsport other than names the likes of David Brabham(Australian?), Peter Brock, Craig Lowndes, Mark Skaife, Mark Webber, and many others I haven't mentioned. I wanted to talk more about this, but ran out of ideas at this moment. So I'll move on.

You like Brute Utes? Here's their official website: { http://www.v8utes.com.au }. I'll tell you what. I'd rather race these things than the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series. Road-going Utes and Brute Utes would be just as sweet as taking trucks out for a little Gran Turismo drive. Either that, or just give Americans the Chevrolet El Camino and Ford Ranchero. Or put both features in GT5 to make it an America/Australia challenge. I'd actually like to see something similar to an American Muscle vs. Australian Muscle in GT5. Bring back the international rivalries like in GT1 (USA vs. Japan, Japan vs. UK, UK vs. USA) and expand them to include some more international action.

it is a holden :)
i see those guys on speed week every now and then when they show the drift comps. 1000 hp :crazy: :drool:
there great to watch! australia vs america would be great
could have races such as aussie gm vs american gm, aussie ford vs american ford, our utes vs your utes, even supercars or no restrictions
i agree on bringing back rivalries, would be very interesting
 
The last bathurst gibson racing threatend to pull out because of the restrictions, they were breaking wheels from the weight. In the end a lot of the v8 guys respected the gtr. I think it was brock who said they are punnishing it for being a better car. It still holds the record for the quickest finish, also v8's only just did 300kmph down conrod and made a big deal about it, well back in 91 gtr did 299kmph and would of been capable of more for sure if cams werent so passive.
 
The last bathurst gibson racing threatend to pull out because of the restrictions, they were breaking wheels from the weight.
Gibson Motorsport did threaten to pull out of the 1992 Bathurst 1000 and CAMS said "Fine, you pull out, we're not loosening the restrictions", and Gibson backed down.
I think it was brock who said they are punnishing it for being a better car. It still holds the record for the quickest finish, also v8's only just did 300kmph down conrod and made a big deal about it, well back in 91 gtr did 299kmph and would of been capable of more for sure if cams werent so passive.
It certainly wasn't Perkins. He was flabbergasted at how a car that was suppossed to be restricted to 450hp could overtake a car, on a straight, that had 550hp. The other problem with Group A, policing the rules. They are kidding themselves if they thought the Skyline did have only 450hp. As for the V8s only doing 300kph, give a car like a Skyline or a V8 touring car a different gear or diff ratio and who knows what speed they will do. The year before last, Paul Stubber's '69 Camaro did 299kph down Conrod Straight, imagine what it could have done if it had four wheel drive traction out of Forrests Elbow...
 
After watching the 1992 Bathurst race when the Gibson GTR was with one of the Shell Sierras and as they go to the straights the Sierras were able to pull on the GTR (while the GTR was behind in slipstream) and when the GTR did pass (with a gap) and then got to the straight after the first corner the Sierra had so much pull that it nearly took the lead back. The GTR's must have had some power restrictions on the car.
 
Great write up Schrodes 👍 (Post #43)

The politics of racing can sometimes be more interesting than the racing itself.

My first memories of Bathurst were watching the 1000 on British TV in the days when the Eggenberger and Dick Johnson(?) RS500's were competing.
 
Thanks mate but it's not my work. I paraphrased a bit and tidied up the grammar a bit but I got it from a site I can't find now.
It was indeed Dick Johnson that raced a Sierra in Australia. 'Trickie Dickie' took his Sierra team to Silverstone in 1988 to compete in the Tourist Trophy. DJ took pole by over a second and was leading the race until the water pump failed. British driver Robb Gravett purchased one of Dick Johnson's Sierras for the 1989 season and finished second in class before winning the title the following year.
Dick Johnson won his fourth and fifth ATCC in '88 and 89 respectivley and won the Bathurst 1000 in 1989 in a Sierra.
Dick Johnson is one of the true legends of Australian motorsport. He even gave NASCAR a shot at one stage and was popular for his willingness to talk with the commentators while racing. I haven't watched close enough since I found this out but apparently you can see Dick's Redkote car in the background in the Tom Cruise film Days of Thunder.
I will never forget the closing stages of the Bathurst 1000 in 1987 when Peter Brock was running in third place. It had been raining and the saftey car had been out. 1987 was the first time a saftey car had been used at Bathurst. Brock had pitted and fitted slick tyres while others had stayed with wets. There was a dry line around the track and the camera was on Brock. If he was just an inch off line the Commodore would snap into oversteer. At one stage, Brock was closing on a slower BMW while one of the Eggenberger Sierras was coming up to lap Brock. The Sierra was sitting on Brocks bumper and flashing it's lights trying to get past but there was no way Brock was getting off the dry line with slicks. The Sierra got past but Brock un-lapped himself closer to the finish. It was all irrelevant however as three months later the FIA disqualified the Eggenberger Sierras for using illegal fuel and Brock was awarded the win.
 
TheCracker
Great write up Schrodes 👍 (Post #43)

The politics of racing can sometimes be more interesting than the racing itself.

My first memories of Bathurst were watching the 1000 on British TV in the days when the Eggenberger and Dick Johnson(?) RS500's were competing.

i think politics just get in the way.
infact i think it just makes racing mundane
 
Let me take you around Bathurst. Here is a description of Bathurst: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/mountpanorama87.html }. And here is a map of Bathurst: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/mountpanorma87_map.gif }

JOHN'S RIDE AROUND BATHURST
Bathurst is an Australian thrill ride for a reason. Part of the track is a speedy thrill ride. These other parts are sort of like a rally course. To show you the way around, I decided I'll use the Team Betta Electrical Ford Falcon BA, driven by Craig Lowndes. Of course, I'll be using "ToCA Race Driver 3."

Hell Corner is a tight, sharp corner which starts off your trip through this Australian purgatory. Be careful not to get understeer heading into this corner. The Mountain Straight is a wonderful and speedy section where you can enter heated slipstream battles. Three-wide isn't going to work too well on these narrow roads. The course gets to be twisty and pounding on suspensions as you have multiple elevation changes between Quarry and McPhillamy Park. You go uphill to Quarry and have to be careful not to whack the outside wall or another car. You have another slight uphill into The Cutting. The Cutting leads to an sweeping uphill section known as Griffin's Mount. You'll need light to moderate braking at Reid Park. You later go DOWN hill into Sulman Park. You need mostly light braking here. There's sort of a hump in the road between Sulman Park and McPhillamy Park. Stay away from the sand trap at McPhillamy Park. And now, one of the toughest parts of the track- Skyline into the Dipper Esses. This is a series of downhill esses which are almost too easy to overshoot. Brake HARD into Skyline and don't go any higher than third gear. You'll need the low speed to catch the corners successfully. It's also too easy to bang into the walls at these esses. Make sure you make clean passes to avoid causing a man-made road block with another car. Heading into Forrest's Elbow, you may have to brake only once and only moderately. If damage is implemented in GT5, make sure all your parts are working so that you don't get overtaken at high speed. Why? It's Conrod Straight, baby! Get those rev limiters working hard as you blast down this section. You can actually take the kink in the road at full speed. Just don't take The Chase at full speed. That takes you from sixth gear all the way to second or even first. The Chase can be thought of as a large chicane. You'll be at around high Fifth Gear or low sixth gear heading into the final corner, Murray's Corner. Murray's Corner should be take just like Hell Corner. After that, you're home free... all do to it all over again for a few more laps. The time to beat in "ToCA Race Driver 3" is 1:45.71. A successful hot lap that I've done clocked in at about 1:55.94. Hey, I never said I was the best gamer around! And at least you know this is a two-minute track unless you're racing with less powerful machinery.

Earlier, I sort of talked about how most Australian motorsports are sort of virtual unknowns. Here is one reason why: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/australia.html }. Other than that, Bathurst is a great track for a reason. It is a wonderful race track that favors a little of everything out of the car and the driver. The sites I've listed also feature the Bathurst course used between 1938 through 1986. Only real difference I spotted is that The Chase and that kink on the Conrod Straight isn't included. So the Conrod Straight at Bathurst was almost like the ultra-long straight of Circuit de la Sarthe. Only this is Australian and isn't a flat road.
 
JohnBM01
Let me take you around Bathurst. Here is a description of Bathurst: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/mountpanorama87.html }. And here is a map of Bathurst: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/mountpanorma87_map.gif }

JOHN'S RIDE AROUND BATHURST
Bathurst is an Australian thrill ride for a reason. Part of the track is a speedy thrill ride. These other parts are sort of like a rally course. To show you the way around, I decided I'll use the Team Betta Electrical Ford Falcon BA, driven by Craig Lowndes. Of course, I'll be using "ToCA Race Driver 3."

Hell Corner is a tight, sharp corner which starts off your trip through this Australian purgatory. Be careful not to get understeer heading into this corner. The Mountain Straight is a wonderful and speedy section where you can enter heated slipstream battles. Three-wide isn't going to work too well on these narrow roads. The course gets to be twisty and pounding on suspensions as you have multiple elevation changes between Quarry and McPhillamy Park. You go uphill to Quarry and have to be careful not to whack the outside wall or another car. You have another slight uphill into The Cutting. The Cutting leads to an sweeping uphill section known as Griffin's Mount. You'll need light to moderate braking at Reid Park. You later go DOWN hill into Sulman Park. You need mostly light braking here. There's sort of a hump in the road between Sulman Park and McPhillamy Park. Stay away from the sand trap at McPhillamy Park. And now, one of the toughest parts of the track- Skyline into the Dipper Esses. This is a series of downhill esses which are almost too easy to overshoot. Brake HARD into Skyline and don't go any higher than third gear. You'll need the low speed to catch the corners successfully. It's also too easy to bang into the walls at these esses. Make sure you make clean passes to avoid causing a man-made road block with another car. Heading into Forrest's Elbow, you may have to brake only once and only moderately. If damage is implemented in GT5, make sure all your parts are working so that you don't get overtaken at high speed. Why? It's Conrod Straight, baby! Get those rev limiters working hard as you blast down this section. You can actually take the kink in the road at full speed. Just don't take The Chase at full speed. That takes you from sixth gear all the way to second or even first. The Chase can be thought of as a large chicane. You'll be at around high Fifth Gear or low sixth gear heading into the final corner, Murray's Corner. Murray's Corner should be take just like Hell Corner. After that, you're home free... all do to it all over again for a few more laps. The time to beat in "ToCA Race Driver 3" is 1:45.71. A successful hot lap that I've done clocked in at about 1:55.94. Hey, I never said I was the best gamer around! And at least you know this is a two-minute track unless you're racing with less powerful machinery.

Earlier, I sort of talked about how most Australian motorsports are sort of virtual unknowns. Here is one reason why: { http://www.etracksonline.co.uk/Australasia/australia.html }. Other than that, Bathurst is a great track for a reason. It is a wonderful race track that favors a little of everything out of the car and the driver. The sites I've listed also feature the Bathurst course used between 1938 through 1986. Only real difference I spotted is that The Chase and that kink on the Conrod Straight isn't included. So the Conrod Straight at Bathurst was almost like the ultra-long straight of Circuit de la Sarthe. Only this is Australian and isn't a flat road.

did you have all the pro simulation settings on when you got that time?
 
Back