Scaff
Moderator
- 29,408
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
Agree, but this is a whole another league of bad.Oh, don't think that I'm trying to cut them any slack here. From what I've seen the release version is by all accounts worse than the early one they gave out to some YouTubers a couple weeks ago, and I was giving them the benefit of the doubt with the state of that by presuming "haha funny glitch videos will go viral". That the version they intend to sell for full price has even more problems is absolutely unacceptable, and makes it obvious that their ambition outstripped their ability on this.
And to your point, you're right that Cyberpunk set a new standard. Now it seems like the line of thought is that it's okay to push out a broken game, immediately trot out an apology letter image and "development roadmap" (aka the stuff we should have had figured out in beta 0.5) and ask people to please, please, just be patient and give us a little more time (and money, mostly money). And the only reason this seems to be considered okay is that Cyberpunk still made ridiculous profits despite the game being nearly unplayable at launch in some cases, and that apparently sent a strong message that people have lowered their standards so much that they'll buy a cat turd on just the promise that it'll turn into a gold bar in six months' time.
Based on my experience of both at launch on PC, yes it 100% is.So you think this game is worse than Cyberpunk was when it came out?