I've been in the AV industry for a little over 19 years and 4K was discussed back then as was a theoretical 8k. Just to clarify though, the term 4k and 8k are lies. It suggests four and eight thousand lines of resolution. They are only half that. The four and eight came because an UHD picture is the equivalent of four 1080 screens in a tile formation. The actual resolution of "4k" is 2.1k.
Avoid OLED. Due to it being an organic system the colours breakdown and deteriorate much faster than LCD or LED. Also, avoid running the pixel corrector thing you were talking about, it simply ages the pixels when faster. When looking to replace your screen look at Samsung. The pictures on LG screens when compared to other brands do not display colours with as much definition as other premium brands.
What do you do for a living?
That's a brilliant article. Lines of resolution have always been counted horizontally. If you look at how the system has been working since the start of time everything is based on horizontal. The old Teletext system was carried on horizontal lines. The interlaced or progressive side that you were just talking about is nothing more than the order that the lines at fired. The number in front of that is the resolution. That's why it's listed as 480/520/720/1080/2160. It's horizontal lines that carry the info. You can discuss this if you want but I spent 8.5 years working for Sony and have spent since February 2006 working in the professional installing industry.
That one race a month ago with the setting sun, I had to wear sunglasses- I felt stupid sitting there on my rig indoors with my sunglasses on, but the sun was obstructing my view of the apex in a few spots.
I could talk about this all day. Would love to get on to the subject of what the public perceive as "HD" or "4k". People invest extra money in 4K Amazon and Netflix when neither actually broadcast in 4k or anywhere near it. A lot of companies add grain to their higher resolution images because people complain about a super clean image running at a high refresh rate. It's hard for the brain to process a super clean video.I fully agree with you.
I know the horizontal lines contains the info, the teletext, etc. (you can even see the teletext lines if you are watching tv at a videorecorder if you know what I mean, the black/white lines above). But I used to work with the vertical lines when making cuts for disks. Because film widescreen is shot at 2k DCI = 2048 horizontal. But Blu rays are printed for FullHD tv's. So scans downscales to 1920. Like dvds to 720. The horzontal lines are 'less value' as blu ray are printed as 1080p even if the film as 1920 by 800 lines. Therefor I was used to 4K (or 2K or DVD width) as 4096. And not as 2160p which means 2.1K like you said. In the end it is just a matter of perspective, so I understand what you are saying and why.
(The article was just to show people didn't expect such high resolutions and throw things away)
I fully agree with you.
I know the horizontal lines contains the info, the teletext, etc. (you can even see the teletext lines if you are watching tv at a videorecorder if you know what I mean, the black/white lines above). But I used to work with the vertical lines when making cuts for disks. Because film widescreen is shot at 2k DCI = 2048 horizontal. But Blu rays are printed for FullHD tv's. So scans downscales to 1920. Like dvds to 720. The horzontal lines are 'less value' as blu ray are printed as 1080p even if the film as 1920 by 800 lines. Therefor I was used to 4K (or 2K or DVD width) as 4096. And not as 2160p which means 2.1K like you said. In the end it is just a matter of perspective, so I understand what you are saying and why.
(The article was just to show people didn't expect such high resolutions and throw things away)
. Upscale --> Downscale --> loss of qualtiy compared to original image. But this happens with everything what people don't know. People love labels and expert reviews. 
.
I hope the cars in GTS have working sun visors or those tracks with the low sun are going to be a real problem
Some strong claims there, what resolution do likes of Amazon, Netflix and Sky broadcast at then the 4K content?
I don't know about blue lines. But 'side'-lines or mostly solvable by screen adjustment. The black bars don't matter on a disk, they also don't need a lot of storage because they remain black. A disk is always printed as 'full' so you can't at stuff. But I know it is a waste of storage if you rip dvds. But you are not supposed to
They add grain to the image. No point having a grainy 4k image. I challenge you to watch something Amazon or Netflix are claiming is 4k and compare it to a 4k image from YouTube.
That's cool that you guys get some sports in 4k.
Don't you mean 70mm?
Spoke with a friend of mine about this as he sells this kind of gear. He said you'd be waiting several years before these actually hit the market, and that at an affordable price. I've got a 4K TV but no HDR. So my next purchase will be 4K HDR. That should hold me over to get good use out of the PS5 for a few years.
