CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,308
- United States
SpaceX completed 3 static fires today on SN9. First time they have done this many in a single day. 12.5km flight should take place very shortly.
NASA will run a full, four-engine static hotfire today, the final test in the Green Run sequence to certify SLS for flight (planned later this year).
Kicks off somewhere around 5-7pm UTC:
https://www.space.com/nasa-sls-megarocket-artemis-1-engine-test-fireNASA fired up the core stage of its massive new rocket — the Space Launch System (SLS) — on Saturday (Jan. 16) in a critical test that ended prematurely when the booster's engines shut down earlier than planned.
Smoke and flames billowed from the four RS-25 engines that power the behemoth rocket's core booster, a centerpiece of NASA's Artemis moon program, as it roared to life atop a test stand at NASA's Stennis Space Centernear Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Ignition occurred at 5:27
EST (2227 GMT), with 700,000 gallons (2.6 million liters) of cryogenic fuel flowing through the engines as they roared for just over 1 minute, much shorter than planned.
The test was supposed to run for 485 seconds (or just over 8 minutes), which is the amount of time the engines will burn during flight. Following engine ignition, the four RS-25 engines fired for just over 60 seconds, NASA said.
"Not everything went according to script today," NASA chief Jim Bridenstine said late Saturday after the test. "But we got a lot of great data, a lot of great information."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/16/nasa-sls-test-moon-rocket-boeing/Controllers could be heard saying there was an "MCF", or major component failure.
Now the schedule is uncertain.
Mike Pence in 2019 threatened to sideline the SLS.
Numerous government watchdog reports have catalogued a series of technical missteps, wasteful spending and lax oversight. One GAO report found that NASA had paid Boeing tens of millions in award fees for scoring high on evaluations, despite poor performance.
(and of course the aircraft have stupid names; it's apparently a "quirky" thing mental entrepreneurs do when they become mental space entrepreneurs)
Pfft, facts. But yes, Branson - one of the Queen's eight identical illegitimate children (thanks, Carlos Kavros) - has indeed always given his planes stupid names."When G-VWOW was named Cosmic Girl back in 2001, we couldn’t have predicted how the name would come into its own 14 years later. After retiring from passenger service, Cosmic Girl went on to become an airborne launch platform for Virgin Orbit’s satellites." - G-VHOW do we name our aircraft
Even my mental self gives things quirky names... but nobody notices or cares
Amazing thread here on Twitter about SpaceX purchasing offshore oil rigs for use as future mobile launch platforms.
Is it just barely conceivable that Musk could become the greatest human being in history since Noah?Would be funky if Doom suddenly becomes a documentary when he has a bunch of scientists running around on Mars and its moons.
Pffft, it doesn't even have a quirky, pop-culture name. Amateur.Jeff Bezos' space-going-up-to outfit Blue Origin successfully launched and recovered its New Shepard booster and (currently unmanned) capsule last week, reaching an apogee of 105km.
15 consecutive successes? That's a lot of explosive disassembly to clean up...This time the capsule was fully fitted with all the trimmings for habitation, and this marks the program's 15th consecutive successful capsule landing.
Ah, there it is. Phew, normality is restored; Bezos is a pro.Mannequin Skywalker
Still no FAA approval for flight so today's attempt has been cancelled. On a positive note, we could see SN10 make its way to Pad A very soon. Which means two Starships on launch mounts at the same time...