Space In General

They found similar things with all the Gas Giants. It's probably just the magnetic field. If it really was extra-terrestrial dialogue you'd have to assume it was coming from Titan or Enceladus.
 
News in, gravity is not a constant and is variable. Or if it is and previous calculations were an error, the sun (and all stars) will die sooner than predicted. Interesting either way.
 
News in, gravity is not a constant and is variable. Or if it is and previous calculations were an error, the sun (and all stars) will die sooner than predicted. Interesting either way.

And so shall human life.
 

Dammit!

I just came in here to post that. :lol:
Here is the NASA JPL link.

And a picture of Voyager 1's signal:

pia17047vlba_0.jpg


The VLBA made this image of Voyager 1's signal on Feb. 21, 2013. At the time, Voyager 1 was 11.5 billion miles (18.5 billion kilometers) away.
The image is about 0.5 arcseconds on a side. An arcsecond is the apparent size of a penny as seen from 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) away. The slightly oblong shape of the image is a result of the array's configuration.
 
The VLBA made this image of Voyager 1's signal on Feb. 21, 2013. At the time, Voyager 1 was 11.5 billion miles (18.5 billion kilometers) away.
The image is about 0.5 arcseconds on a side. An arcsecond is the apparent size of a penny as seen from 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) away. The slightly oblong shape of the image is a result of the array's configuration.

To put that into perspective 11.5 billion miles is the distance light would travel in around 17 hours. For light to reach the closest star it would take just over 4.2 years. So if Voyager was on a direct path to the nearest star it would take approximately 75,000 years to get there travelling around 36,500 mph....Pretty big place we have here :sly:
 
To put that into perspective 11.5 billion miles is the distance light would travel in around 17 hours. For light to reach the closest star it would take just over 4.2 years. So if Voyager was on a direct path to the nearest star it would take approximately 75,000 years to get there travelling around 36,500 mph....Pretty big place we have here :sly:

Ah yes, I see you have also realized that we are stuck in our Solar system. :lol:
 
How far out is the Oort Cloud? What are the possibilities of it reaching that by 2025?

50000 AU away. So reaching it won't happen for another 15000 year or so.

Since 1 AU is the distance from the Sun to the Earth and it takes about 8 Minutes for light to travel such a distance this problem can be solved by simple multiplication and division.

(50,000 AU)(8 Minutes)=400,000 Minutes/60 (Minutes/Hour)=6666.67 Hours/24 (Hours/Earth Day)=277.78 Days

So the answer is 277.78 Earth Days or 0.76 Earth Years!


Also, have a picture of the Sun:

1269353_10151610027301466_367057665_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
How far out is the Oort Cloud? What are the possibilities of it reaching that by 2025?

The Oort cloud has been hypothesized but never confirmed or observed. It is a great convenience in explaining the origin of long period comets.
 
The Oort cloud has been hypothesized but never confirmed or observed. It is a great convenience in explaining the origin of looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong period comets.

I fixed that for you!

It wouldn't surprise me if it more a band of asteroids like the Asteroid belt or the Kuyper belt.

Seeing that there are now plenty of other solarsystems discovered and none of them seem to have an Oortcloud like sphere around them.
 
I'm just wondering, if the Oort Cloud is real, how did all of those comets get ejected so far out from the Sun?

I guess the reason why we haven't found spheres similar to the Oort Cloud around other stars is the same reason we couldn't find extrasolar planets 20 years ago, our telescopes aren't powerful enough.
 
One hypothesis is that during the birth of the sun and neighboring stars, and the very earliy times of the solar systems forming, stars pulled matter from each other before being separated into their own orbits within the Milky Way.

Personally, I'm not sure how that would form the theorized sphere, but I'm not what you'd call a recognized expert.
 
If an Oort cloud is difficult enough to definitively detect that we haven't found one around our own star than I'm unsurprised we haven't found one around another star.
 
DK
I'm just wondering, if the Oort Cloud is real, how did all of those comets get ejected so far out from the Sun?

I guess the reason why we haven't found spheres similar to the Oort Cloud around other stars is the same reason we couldn't find extrasolar planets 20 years ago, our telescopes aren't powerful enough.

Once there was an hypothesis that a planet exploded in our solar system, leaving behind what remains in the current so-called "asteroid belt". Long period comets would then have been originated from this explosion, and some cometary orbital calculations were said to be in agreement with this.

However, I haven't kept up with this, and this hypothesis may have been debunked.
 
The hypothesis about the Oort Cloud still lives, as it seems to be a somewhat logic explanation.

Also, have another picture about Voyager 1's whereabouts:

1276968_10151615735666466_17332424_o.jpg
 
GOCE Satellite should be hitting earth sometime. So far over Australia but hasn't fall below 100Km. Possible East Coast Strike is possible now.
 
Over the past week I noticed that there is what looks like a very close/big star (though it probably isn't one) relatively speaking to the horizon. Sorry it's a bit vague, but any ideas what it may be? I haven't seen it before.

I live in England by the way if that helps.
 
East? West? There's a comet going by the Sun this month and it's supposed to be bright enough to see with the naked eye around the end of November, beginning of December. Right now it's visible with binoculars very early in the morning.

I think Venus? is relatively bright in the sky at the moment. Kind of south, south-west.
 
There aren't any planets visible at that sort of time at the moment, so my best guess is the star system Capella, which would be roughly in the area of the sky you're describing at the times you describe.

Venus is below the horizon at the moment, and also in the western sky.
 
It's just quite strange how bright/big it looks, i'd say its twice the size of the next brightest star I can see at the moment with the naked eye. Maybe it's a result of it being close to the horizon, much like how the sun looks bigger as it sets/rises?
 
It's just quite strange how bright/big it looks, i'd say its twice the size of the next brightest star I can see at the moment with the naked eye. Maybe it's a result of it being close to the horizon, much like how the sun looks bigger as it sets/rises?
Possibly. But it's the sixth brightest star overall in the night sky. Third brightest if you're talking ones visible from the northern hemisphere, and only Vega is brighter in the current sky, though it's more toward the west.

All that said, Jupiter has just risen above the horizon in the last hour or so directly below Capella in the sky. If you live in a built-up area there's no way you'll see it right now unless you've got a spot of empty horizon, but given another few hours it'll probably be quite visible.

Capella is quite bright though, because it's two binary star systems in close proximity. So you're getting the light of four stars.
 
South east at about 6pm, but is at roughly north east-east by 9pm.

It's Jupiter. Venus sets at about 6 pm at the moment. Whilst Jupiter is currently passing through the Gemini constellation and is approaching opposition which will be on January 6th.
 
Back