Space In General

So I was walking to the shop with my brother about an hour ago, and my brother said that two planes looked like they were going to crash. So, I looked up and saw a plane with flashing lights fly past what I thought was a star.
So I said to my brother that the other thing is star, to which he replied "no it isn't, there are flashing red and green lights".
So I looked again, and said that it was just a star twinkling. He then said "how come the other ones aren't twinkling as much then?" And sure enough, they weren't.
I'm not too sure that this "thing" actually was flashing red and green as I didn't have my glasses on, but it was definitely pulsating.
Any ideas what it may be? I was about the size of a bright star if that helps much.
 
Doesn't it move pretty fast though, like just visible for a few seconds or am I wrong? We saw it for at least a minute. My brother said it was moving but I didn't notice it moving at any real speed.
Also, why would it be pulsating?
Thanks for your reply 👍
 
There are a couple of stars in the night sky that seem to change colour a little as they twinkle. Generally the brighter ones.

There's a couple of possible answers - as in, I'm sure I've read about it at some point, but can't check right now. One is that a few of them are binary systems - two stars in orbit around each other - and the different light they emit leads to different wavelengths reaching earth at different times, leading to more flickering than if there was just the single star.

The other could be that air movement in the atmosphere is refracting a brighter and more visible star (so the flickering is more visible than for smaller stars in the sky) and the colours are a result of the refracted light.
 
There are a couple of stars in the night sky that seem to change colour a little as they twinkle. Generally the brighter ones.

There's a couple of possible answers - as in, I'm sure I've read about it at some point, but can't check right now. One is that a few of them are binary systems - two stars in orbit around each other - and the different light they emit leads to different wavelengths reaching earth at different times, leading to more flickering than if there was just the single star.

The other could be that air movement in the atmosphere is refracting a brighter and more visible star (so the flickering is more visible than for smaller stars in the sky) and the colours are a result of the refracted light.

Ok, that would make sense I suppose 👍.

Regarding the ISS, I have just watched a few videos of it from earth and it does look slightly similar to what I saw.
 
Jupiter is very bright and quite low down in the sky at this time of year. Depending on the atmospheric conditions, it may well appear to 'twinkle'/change colour... I'm sure I saw something similar as a kid... infact, I had one of those torches that can change colour, and my mate and I were convinced that the torch light (green, red and white) was reflecting off whatever it was we were looking at (probably Jupiter or Saturn). Stupid kids.

Also, the Northern Lights are apparently visible very far south this evening, so it is possible that you might be seeing something like that infront of Jupiter, which would be an extremely rare sight in England!!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...s-may-be-seen-in-britain-tonight-9049869.html
 
Gah, that reminds me, I missed Brian Cox's stargazing show on Wednesday. :grumpy:
 
Looks perfectly legit to me...

5e8vo5.jpg
Actually i like that pick as it was taken with new camera technology, we are just too used to those Apollo mission pictures and videos, which date back 40 years. So this would be a more true to life pick of how the lighting looks like on the moon.

Found this one also:
8c89a590f56e1420eb6363.jpg


Crazy no! Imagine standing there right now.
 
Last edited:
Come to think of it, the Moon would be a great location for a prison camp.

New Guantanamo? :D How about a toxic waste dump, carbon sink, or source of minerals? 💡 Military types think in terms of holding the high ground. :rolleyes:

BBC radio ran a piece this morning on the ethics of geo-engineering a shell of particles around Earth to mitigate global warming, as the ability to do it is within our monkey's grasp.
 
BBC radio ran a piece this morning on the ethics of geo-engineering a shell of particles around Earth to mitigate global warming, as the ability to do it is within our monkey's grasp.

If we blow up the moon we can create a nice dustcloud!
 
My reference to the book was in response to @Touring Mars' suggestion that the Moon would be a good place for a prison camp.


Sorry 'bout the italics, they got turned on somehow and I can't turn them off again. I really detest this new editor.
 
So the Dwarf planet Ceres has been observed releasing water vapour.

Surprised this hasn't been discussed a bit more. It's a planet well within its star system's Goldilocks zone and this is a rather interesting sign that another planet could support, or actually is supporting life.

Or should this go in the alien thread?
 
I hope they do. I'd rather see the money go to science and exploration than military or cleaning political messes..

I hope they don't. They should be giving that money to private space companies as subsidies. Let NASA die, we don't need them the government to be our leader into exploring outer space.
 
So the Dwarf planet Ceres has been observed releasing water vapour.

Surprised this hasn't been discussed a bit more. It's a planet well within its star system's Goldilocks zone and this is a rather interesting sign that another planet could support, or actually is supporting life.
Actually it's not within the habitable (Goldilocks) zone, which is where liquid water would exist on the surface. We don't know where the vapor came from yet, it could be direct sublimation from ice for example. We've known for a while that water frost exists on the surface.

Nonetheless, it's (barely) possible that subsurface liquid water exists, and of course liquid water is a precondition for the development of life as we know it. So yeah, it's a pretty exciting development.
 
Actually it is in the habitable zone, if it would have a thick enough atmosphere it could have surface water.

330px-Estimated_extent_of_the_Solar_Systems_habitable_zone.png


The dark green area is the pretty much confirmed (conservative) zone, and the lighter green is the estimated (extended) zone for liquid surface water.
 
I've always had a hunch about Ceres holding some interesting secret. There is an image of it which is quite grainy, but there is a very bright spot on it, which has puzzled astronomers. We'll know what it is in a year of so when Dawn reaches it.

676px-Ceres_Rotation.jpg
 
Back