Space In General

Very cloudy over here, so taking photos was very hard. At least the eclipse looked much better for the human eyes.

img_2855g_by_gt6_garage-d8mecnx.jpg
 
Wish I had a proper camera to get some shots. Well, got 11 years to get one! Though I did manage to watch it and grab some half okay pictures. Lens flare managed to catch the eclipse more than the core substance of the photos :P
 
10835395_891163771278_8129936342496331808_o.jpg


Turns out we didn't need the makeshift filters (plastic wrappers from boxes of tea bags), as the eclipse could be seen with the naked eye due to just the right amount of cloud coverage.
 
Not all of the puzzling bright spots on the dwarf planet Ceres are alike. The closest-yet images of the gleams, taken from 45,000 kilometres away, suggest that at least two of the spots look different from one another when seen in infrared wavelengths.
http://www.nature.com/news/mystery-of-ceres-bright-spots-grows-1.17313

1.17313_PIA19316.jpg

NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/ASI/INAF
Infrared images suggest that Spot 1 (top row), an area on Ceres, is made of ice. But the pair of bright gleams known as Spot 5 were invisible to an infrared camera (bottom right).


NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA
The surface of the dwarf planet Ceres (shown here) has fewer large craters than researchers expected.
 
SpaceX launch/landing in 10 minutes, weather looks much better.

Edit: Launch successful, just waiting on confirmation of booster landing. Sounded like it went well.
 
Last edited:
SpaceX launch/landing in 10 minutes, weather looks much better.

Edit: Launch successful, just waiting on confirmation of booster landing. Sounded like it went well.

I roughly calculated the trajectory after it left the East coast and if my eyes did not deceive me, I just saw CRS-6 blast by. 👍
 
Uh....second time. And this time around it was much more successful than the first. I bet $50 they stick the landing next time.

That looks like Jalopnik, not surprising. :rolleyes:
 
Back