- 21,261
- United States
Nope.
And automobiles are? Airplanes? How many of those would you guess broke down or crashed in the 2:19 it took for this rocket to get off the pad and disintegrate?It's amazing that, in the 6 decades of low-earth orbital rocket launches, they are still having catastrophic rocket failures. It does not seem to be a reliable and mature technology.
Automobiles were not safe or reliable in the first 60 years. But now they are. Rocketry will take another 40 years to be perfected, I'd guess.And automobiles are? Airplanes? How many of those would you guess broke down or crashed in the 2:19 it took for this rocket to get off the pad and disintegrate?
I'm sure if you have a better idea, NASA would love to hear it.
This is SpaceX's first failure since they started doing satellite & resupply missions. I'd say their success rate is quite high. Nobody is perfect, and we all know the Shuttle was not perfect either. Traveling to space is no easy task, stuff like this will continue to happen for some time. You learn from these failures and move forward.That disintegration was quite astounding to watch.
Time to take the Space Shuttle out the mothballs whilst they get to grips with all these new rockets?
This is SpaceX's first failure since they started doing satellite & resupply missions. I'd say their success rate is quite high. Nobody is perfect, and we all know the Shuttle was not perfect either. Traveling to space is no easy task, stuff like this will continue to happen for some time. You learn from these failures and move forward.
I only half agree. The original Shuttle was getting really old and it was time to retire it, but the idea of the Shuttle shouldn't have died. They could have taken what they knew from the original and redesigned it to be more efficient and safe.I was half joking xD
In all seriousness, SpaceX has, like you said, done a good job and are always working towards doing a better job. That being said, I always feel that the Shuttle was retired too early
I only half agree. The original Shuttle was getting really old and it was time to retire it, but the idea of the Shuttle shouldn't have died. They could have taken what they knew from the original and redesigned it to be more efficient and safe.
The Shuttle took more weight into space than it needed to, the reusable launch stage might be inherently more efficient. It should also be easier to recover given the amount of runway the Shuttle needed since reentry necessitated terrible gliding wings.I only half agree. The original Shuttle was getting really old and it was time to retire it, but the idea of the Shuttle shouldn't have died. They could have taken what they knew from the original and redesigned it to be more efficient and safe.
That's Pluto right? For a moment there I thought it was Mars and Venus. Wow!