Is this even possible?!? My Murcielago SV beated my Aventador in everything expect Top speed (didnt even test) both fully tuned!
Hmmmm, now you've stroked my interest. Might be setup, but now I wanna test that (the only two cars that beat the Aventador in top speed were the Veyron and 2012 GT-R, and I've tested the 12 speed, lol)
unclear on the last part of your statement.
You're saying the Speed 12 is not faster than the Aventador? I find that hard to believe.
I'd hardly call the scenery amazing.
Its most likely the setup, but for some reason it didn't want to go faster, pretty sure I lowered the downforce, its got max hp, and I didn't hit the rev limiter. And I know the car can hit 250, I was gonna go back and fix it in a practice run (so as to not waste test list space) but I got more into other cars, lol, I might have stretched the tranny out to much. After the Lambo SV, I'm gonna fix it. I'm actually ashamed that I somehow was able to mess it up
Chad D.Hmmmm, now you've stroked my interest. Might be setup, but now I wanna test that (the only two cars that beat the Aventador in top speed were the Veyron and 2012 GT-R, and I've tested the 12 speed, lol)
Again, how is the G-force test conducted?
For a giggle, could someone upload a vid of two Xcars going at each other at top speed.
Be nice to see the collision and how GT deals with it.
Much appreciated if ya could.
On the road.
Starts at 11 seconds though sorry.
Now that is cool but for some reason the first thought was lateral G-force tests. Does it show your G's under breaking?The G-force is measured in the acceleration test and measures the G-force achieved at the initial start of the run. There is no lateral G-force test such as a skid pad, etc.
I honest-to-goodness got air in the 2J on the bridge yesterday in arcade mode.
It was hilarious.
Now that is cool but for some reason the first thought was lateral G-force tests. Does it show your G's under breaking?
No. It just shows acceleration G-force.
Would you mind elaborating the bolded parts a little further?...the testing is a welcome addition to the game (even if it is let down by problems GT5 has suffered from since 1.0), but I can certainly see why people think it was rushed. It is rough in spots ...
^ Whats that!? Another variation?
-> Hmm...
^ Whats that!? Another variation?
looks like it, and that banking looks like fun
^ Sure it may look cartoonish but...with a HUGE but! The layout is inspired from the Daimler-Benz test track.Yes I think this is another variation.
There's two "snails" style junctions with the current track with almost cartoonish bankings.
If you go on the big bay bridge, use photomode and look right, you can see the first junction from the other side of the track then a tunnel exit on a tall bridge witch join the track a few miles before the big bridge youre on. And between thoses two, something like another snail burried inside a huge concrete thing. A bit complex just for a scenery...
If they open it, it's gonna be wild!
No. If you check the track yourself (you don't need to purchase the DLC to drive it online, at least until next patch), you'll see that what you're referring about is not another oval, but it's potentially more interesting.^ And alas! There is another oval, but this time its inspired from JARI Test Track, does it mean that Test Course '90s would make a comeback?
No. If you check the track yourself (you don't need to purchase the DLC to drive it online, at least until next patch), you'll see that what you're referring about is not another oval, but it's potentially more interesting.