Hiya folks, sorry about the total radio silence. Us folks at SRC have had our heads down and working on keeping the racing experience as top notch as possible.
So quick check in - our finale for the Copen is next Thursday, the 1 hour at Northern Isle race.
This is the current driver rankings for the season.
But that's not all! As we get ready to go into our two month intermission, I've drawn up a number of proposals to consider regarding the future of the Copen Cup.
(From left to right, the "Spec III", the "Spec II" and the "Spec I").
The proposals are as follows:
1)
Spec I
The current Copen spec that we have right now, at 70 HP and 1700 lbs with the various associated parts on the car.
Pros: No change and no need to adjust for any new factors besides tracks and physics changes.
Cons: Competitive balance seems to slightly favor using the Short box in most situations, even those where it would lose to the Long box on paper. Still a 70 HP car with all the hiccups that comes with that.
2)
Spec 1.5
An in-between for the I and II proposals. Adds the Low-RPM turbo to the required parts for the Copen.
HP goes up to 90, PP goes up to ~370, weight unchanged.
Pros: More power and significantly more torque. Peak power much closer to peak torque and power curve much more consistent across the board, allowing for better corner exit. Forces a more defined gap between the Short and Long boxes, as the car is now capable of stretching its legs out in 5th gear on fast tracks like the Glen.
Cons: Increased power makes the shifting point references a little wonky, drivers may need a brief adjustment period. Significant boost in straightline speed due to the turbo may end up nerfing the Short box into the ground (which would negate the reason for adding it in the first place). Car is also more likely to wheelspin in certain cases.
3)
Spec II
Copen + Low RPM turbo + Full Aero
Pros: aero provides a significant boost to the stability of the car, especially with regards to the rear grip in corners. Style points, especially with the Large wing option. All aero is equal function, so A/B parts and custom/A wing would be allowed.
Cons: Added drag may hamper the car's straight line speed, especially with a high aero set-up. These are Copens with only 90 HP and a top speed somewhere in the 110 MPH range on a long enough straight. Aero benefits may not be sufficient for the cost in the car. Requires a new Base Style, which means new liveries, new customization, etc. Your Copen may look like a Fast and Furious ricer by the time the season starts. Added aero tuning may add too much complexity for a league intended to be a simple but challenging one.
4)
Gen II / Spec III. Copen RJ
Retire the Spec I Copen (and the 2002 Copen in general) in favor of the Copen RJ VGT with an all new Style and BoP. Copen RJ BOP would be 105 HP and 1499 lbs.
Pros: Vastly improved driving experience, significantly faster overall pace (just slow enough BOP-wise that a fast RJ driver could beat a slow NR-A MX5 driver in a straight-up race). Car comes fully fitted for race spec from the factory, including fully tunable aero, differential and semi-unrestricted suspension options
Cons: Vehicle is worth 1,000,000 credits. Added parts (ballast, restrictor, tyres) brings total to approx. 1,030,000 cr. Pretty inaccessible to drivers who aren't willing to grind or don't have the RJ already. Base Copen by comparison is maybe 50,000 cr. Vehicle being fully tunable means there is a significantly higher emphasis on having a strong set-up rather than just pure driving skill and may clash with the original goal of the Cup.
==
Community vote will go up during the intermission period, but I am open to discussion and suggestions in the meanwhile.