- 5,888
- Vidzeme, Riga
- Driverman447
- None.
I don't think it can be worse than this. Those are obvious PS1 graphics
Not PS2! Why does everyone think that PS2 looked so bad??
I don't think it can be worse than this. Those are obvious PS1 graphics
Nissan Fairlady 240ZG (HS30) '71
GT5 Standard /GT6 version (better than the Standard not good enough to be a Premium)
View attachment 92675 View attachment 92676
Good job @Mikhail K.
I agree too that there is need for a common definition for these cars that have clearly been improved since GT5, but have varying quality (from just above GT4 standards, to almost Premium level). It looks like some users don't like them to be called "semi-premium".
Not PS2! Why does everyone think that PS2 looked so bad??
Because they have many dupes. If they can improve 1 car, there are 15 others that the improvement can be copied to.Mazda, Mitsubishi and Nissan take up 58.1% of the list.
Looks like I'll have to take back what I said earlier. I fired up GT4 and took the Alto for a spin. It really did look that bad after all. Poor, poor thing.Haha, I still have a working PS2 and trust me, GT4 looks horrible for today's standards and looks horrible compared to GT5/GT6. The thing is, back then it looked good in Small Definition tube televisions.
Because it does. Nowadays, anyway, with our modern 21st century high resolution TVs. PS1 graphics were far far worse (not for their time obviously, but by today's standards), I don't know why everyone forgets what PS1 graphics looked like. I'm fairly certain that car is just a direct port of the GT4 model with no changes made whatsoever. That's just what GT4's models look like when blown up to 1080p and contrasted with high-def everything else.
a "premium" suzuky alto, unbelievable
I don't see this as a problem. Much better than "clearly not very good looking."There were many deceivingly good-looking Standard cars in GT5.
I know it's been a while since many of us played GT4, but there were a few cars of low quality. The Opel Speedster was another. It didn't have bad textures, but the car model was very blocky and low poly. It stuck out like a sore thumb in GT5, but it may be the most improved model in GT6, and looks very nice.The above post though reminded me that the Alto was a standard even in GT4! So GT4 did have premiums and standards, though they weren't that different.
Because it's the truth... PS2 graphics are pretty bad if you compare them to today standards, and obviously the PS1 ones are much much worse. Take a look at the post where I compare PS1 and PS2 graphics.Not PS2! Why does everyone think that PS2 looked so bad??
Because it's the truth... PS2 graphics are pretty bad if you compare them to today standards, and obviously the PS1 ones are much much worse. Take a look at the post where I compare PS1 and PS2 graphics.
They need to get back whatever license they had in GT3 to return the sponsors it had in GT3. What gets me is that they could've upgraded the car from GT4 to GT5 since they had to remove the FPV sponsor from the car.Worst in the game.
It is PS2 graphics but because of the low resolution on PS2 it didn't look as bad in a way. EDIT: TreedNot PS2! Why does everyone think that PS2 looked so bad??
Why. Why can't it look like this instead that. That, THING above!
The Alto will surely become the butt of many jokes on here.
A 2kg weight reduction?The one on the right (R) was a purpose built racer, that had a number of modification, weight reduction, suspension changes etc., the one on the left was sold through dealerships, I believe all of them for that year where painted white with blue stripes. The following year 66' the Hertz cars came out with different colors.
It's more pointless because they're spec'd almost identically.In real life, the R is the racing version of the Shelby GT350.
The quote comes from this article:
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1081426_rare-1965-shelby-gt350r-hits-the-block-in-scottsdal
Although, it does seem pointless to have in GT6 now since you can give the normal GT350 a weight reduction, mod the suspension, & change the bumpers to a similar style to the R.
dude i loved your black RUF gonna buy it ingame can u tell me witch color you used exactly ?View attachment 92747 View attachment 92746 View attachment 92745
well that not so bad but still need to get premiumised!
dude i loved your black RUF gonna buy it ingame can u tell me witch color you used exactly ?
and if we could just put some liveries on it that would be insane
Because at first, it did.Not PS2! Why does everyone think that PS2 looked so bad??
You never know, the premiumized models might come as DLC for GT6, if PD knew the cars would take longer than their deadline allowed.The new PS3 standard cars must've been made for the next game on PS4, it makes no sense to waste time remodeling these cars to this standard otherwise. If we look at the pulled photos of the PS4 Gran Turismo scanning session the Alfa race car was being scanned, the Lancia rally cars were also present, these cars in GT6 are still the same awful PS2 standard models as there's no need to bring them up to the new PS3 standard model level as they're getting the full premium treatment.
The car quality split will still be alive and kicking next gen, imo.