Star Trek - May 8th

  • Thread starter Robin
  • 52 comments
  • 4,727 views
I liked it a lot. But the antagonist..Nero? was really dull and i didn't really care about him. Most excellent movies really make you hate the villain.

Oh, and that stupid "lens flash" that happens in every scene on the Enterprise got old really fast.
 
Giancarlo: according to what I read, all that "lens flash" was done to make it look like it was filmed instad of Computer generated. I believe this is the first time the majority of the ship action was CG instead of Miniatures. they wouldna pulled off Nero's mining ship as a mini without revealing what models were hacked apart to make the minature.
 
After several attempts and unforeseen circumstances I saw Star Trek tonight, really the only thing I have to say is that while cheesy as hell, I was very entertained. I hope they make a new TV series out of it. I love how Simon Pegg is in the movie too.
 
I went to see it, though it was a very good movie! And as someone else pointed out, i thought the villain sucked also! I will go watch the sequel when it comes out.
 
OK, so I finally saw it. I took my dad and we both enjoyed it. They did the series justice without hurting much of anything.

I do not like that they show the ship being built on Earth. I have always had issues with early descriptions of it being built on Mars. Two things: How the hell do you launch it out of the gravity well? And you would never risk the startup matter/antimatter explosions within Earth's Atmosphere. As described in "The Naked Time" you risk creating the largest explosion since the last star in this sector went supernova. You don't do that on or near a planet. Intra-system maneuvering is to be done via thrusters, orbital maneuvering via impulse engines. [/geek rant]

Sorry, I have also been watching the original series season 1 on Blu-Ray. As a comparison it is very good. They hit all the important points, like the socio-political situations, the cerebral and emotional story, and the character interactions. It took Kirk and Spock a while to become friends. In the (second) pilot Spock is testing Kirk and you can see it. But Kirk was always cocky. He was a captain from the beginning and the movie shows this. Like his father, in the end he chooses crew and ship over personal decisions and safety.

Now the one other major issue I have is that the plot does not explain the relationship we see. That makes no sense. Nothing about the timeline explains that change. Up to that point these characters should have been unaffected by the alternate reality.
The only thing I can figure is that maybe Uhura was driven to someone like Spock by her revulsion of Kirk?

Anyway, the feel and characterizations were there. Orci and Kurtzman did it right this time, which leads me to believe that Transformers was more Bay than anything.

If you are a Star Trek fan of old go see it. You can nit-pick tiny details but most of it is right.

And without that POV it is still a good and fun movie. I am willing to bet it will be my favorite fun movie of the year and overall favorite of the summer. God knows that after that GI Joe trailer or Bumblebee crying they won't be it.
 
My guess is that the change in the timeline has permitted different technologies to be utilized in regards to the Enterprise. Keep in mind that this one is more than double the size of the origional, so it would make sense if they weasel out of it that way. Probably.
 
My guess is that the change in the timeline has permitted different technologies to be utilized in regards to the Enterprise. Keep in mind that this one is more than double the size of the origional, so it would make sense if they weasel out of it that way. Probably.
That would work if they had remotely hinted at in some way. Just a mention that they discovered some new technology in researching the Kelvin disaster or whatever, but as it is laid out there is a 25 year gap where the only real noted affect is in Kirk's personality and outlook on life.

Add in that the dialog still suggests impulse engines, thrusters, and warp drives, and it seems as if the writing went out of their way to suggest that the technology is the same.

But it is a minor detail mostly unrelated to the story, and I did overlook it.

The change in ship size and minor design differences is actually a throwback to the old series (and also compounds the liftoff technology even more). In the failed Christopher Pike pilot the Enterprise was small, only ~250 people on board. In the Kirk pilot it was bumped up to over ~400 people on board, and in the rest of the series it was slightly bigger having between 400-500 people on board and is even referred to as a flying city at one point, which then leads to the design and concept changes going into The Next Generation timeline where it literally is a flying city where the crew only makes up approximately half the passengers as it also acts as a diplomatic transport.

Honestly, if Star Trek weren't something that my father put into my mind earlier than I can remember none of this would even stand out to me.



One change I found very nice is the non-human species. There were many more species that appeared to be more than mutated humans. But they were done well. It had an old Star Wars feel to it, where you felt that you could see them actually existing and working based on known science. It avoided the Star Wars prequels that overdid the CGI and left me wondering how some of them could exist on gravity even remotely close to Earth's.

It definitely gave it an update that worked with known possible science as well as utilizing the technology available today. In the 60's I think it would have made the series less popular to have less-human looking species because of prejudices at the time. No one could like them. Now we are at a stage where people easily take a liking to non-human looking creatures. It is a sign of the effect that Spielberg and Lucas have had on sci-fi. Arthur C Clark deserves some credit, but non of his non-human species ever made it on to TV or film. I would love a Rama film series.
 
We went to see this at the cheaper plaza 1 and 2 over the weekend. We have never watched a single Star Trek episode in our lives. We didnt know anything at all about Star Trek before watching this movie. With that said it was very good and I recommend it to everyone even if you dont know about Star Trek. 👍
 
We went to see this at the cheaper plaza 1 and 2 over the weekend. We have never watched a single Star Trek episode in our lives. We didnt know anything at all about Star Trek before watching this movie. With that said it was very good and I recommend it to everyone even if you dont know about Star Trek. 👍
And the nerd takeover of Hollywood is nearly complete.

We were mocked in our youths, but today, with fancy CGI, we are slowly assimilating the world. Resistance is Futile.
 
chris_hemsworth_kirk.jpg


Am I the only person who just now realized that Kirk's dad is Thor? Pretty appropriate in a way. Who do you get to be Kirk's dad... well... that'd have to be Thor.
 
Danoff
Am I the only person who just now realized that Kirk's dad is Thor? Pretty appropriate in a way. Who do you get to be Kirk's dad... well... that'd have to be Thor.

I knew it, but only because my brother-in-law pointed it out to me. Hollywood-obsessed OCDs are good for something it seems.
 
I would never have spotted him or even thought about it except we were watching this (for like the 3rd time since it came out) last night and my wife goes "Is that Thor?". I thought "No, no way".

I was just kinda thinking to myself "Man that guy is really good in this movie. I hope his career goes well." Guess I needn't have worried.
 
Danoff, you should be from Aussie or NZ then, we were going Kim (Home & Away TV series) is James T Kirk's dad... kewl...
 
chris_hemsworth_kirk.jpg


Am I the only person who just now realized that Kirk's dad is Thor? Pretty appropriate in a way. Who do you get to be Kirk's dad... well... that'd have to be Thor.

Wouldn't Chuck Norris be more appropriate?

-

Strange... but cool.
 
Back