- 401
- GTP_mindwise
- xbox?, my pc you mean?
Whoops... let me fix that... I meant Paleontologists.
Well, some paleontologists believe in god, they are just less likely to literally believe in creation story's such as genesis, thank goodness (for goodness sake )
I agree with almost everything you said niky, though Joey knows i object to you calling yourself an agnostic
I did not see you bring forth an example where superstition is ever a good thing, but that was expected
'spiritual' is a very loose definition, i consider myself to be spiritual too, but i do not believe in anything supernatural.
Metaphysical, well, i guess we use different definitions, if i take wikipedia's definition, it reads (at some point).
Thus the original situation of metaphysics being integral with (Aristotelian) physics and science, has, in the West, become reversed so that scientists generally consider metaphysics antithetical to the empirical sciences.
Now, i'm really not sure Einstein and Darwin should be listed as 'believers' of the metaphysical, actually, i'm reasonably comfortable in claiming they both do not (at least not if metaphysics is indeed antithetical to the empirical sciences).
i'm happy to read you are against ID.
Two wrongs do not make a right, correct, however, my point was:
There is a difference between publishing an opinion and legislating i.e. a ban on euthanasia.
Christians seem to position themselves as victims, which is strange considering they are the majority in the US and they are actively imposing their beliefs onto others via legislation.
Now i am not too happy with the wording of the plaque either, but in the end it is just words, perhaps hurting words, but it's not our fault reality does not match up with what some believe, the facts are the facts. (ofcourse it is very generalizing, which is my main objection. It does cause quite a stir and i think that is a good thing.
It seems the timing or the place is deemed inappropriate, would it have been more appropriate to put up a sign that describes the history of x-mas, together with why a tree is present, why it is on the date it is, and the pagan religion that actually 'owns' the 'copyright' to x-mas?
No, i applaud the fact that that plaque was not removed.
I mean, there is at least one court with 'the 10 commandments' banners in it, is there not (in texas for 1, in utah in a public park)
That seems a lot more ridiculous to me, sure, two wrongs don't make a right, however, to get 'biblical' "don't try to remove a splinter from someones eye while a log is inside your own" does seem to be very appropriate to all those protesting christians.
How about me claiming a 'jesus x-mas crib' in a government building is in fact a violation of your first amendment? Am i technically wrong with that claim?
If i am not, then having the FFRF banner next to it, in fact, re leaves the crib from being a violation, as not a single religion/viewpoint is endorsed anymore
"Everyone has their unshakeable abstract belief ... how you and society evolve and develop over time."
That seems contradictory, either it is an unshakable belief, or it evolves.
Unshakable beliefs seem more in the realm of religion
Ah well, thanks for your inputs, very interesting.