- 1,049
- Grand Rapids,MI
- HaydenFan69
Where they their generation’s field filler? The Reed Sorenson, Ty Dillon.
It's very hard to call Cecil Gordon a field filler. In 1971 he had more points than Bobby Allison and finished 3rd in the Championship. In 1973, he beat out Petty AND Allison while finishing 3rd. Half of the top 10 in points in 1973 never finished on the lead lap (Gordon, James Hylton, Walter Ballard, Elmo Langley and McDuffie). Keep in mind it was different points system and cars were overall less reliable (Gordon was running at the end of 23 of the 28 races. Petty, despite 6 wins, only finished 18). It also didn't help that the season's most dominant driver, David Pearson with 11 wins, only ran 18 of the 28 races.Where they their generation’s field filler? The Reed Sorenson, Ty Dillon.
Man, that's an impressive level of anorak. Love this thread. Happy 10 years man!On my 10 year GTP anniversary, I've got the most anorakish of all anorakish statistics for you.
Jim Clark is the only driver in the history of Formula One to break the record for most Grand Prix wins but not extend that record; in winning the 1968 South African Grand Prix, Jim Clark won his 25th race and broke Juan Manuel Fangio's then record of 24 Grand Prix wins. Clark did not win another race until his death and thus never extended his record.
Every other driver who has held the record (Farina, Fangio, Stewart, Prost, Schumacher and Hamilton) won at least one more race.
Despite not finishing a race in 2020, Marc Márquez scored the most points in the 2019 and 2020 MotoGP seasons combined.
Don't recall seeing this one here. Thought it was interesting.
Come again?Britain refers to a geographic area and not the United Kingdom of Great Britain
Most of the 500's I remember from when Michael was driving, he was either in the lead, battling for the lead, or speaking from behind the pitwall after another early retirement.Over the course of their careers Michael Andretti lead 2 laps more at the Indy 500 than Rick Mears, yet Mears won 4 times and Andretti never did.
Mears combined with Penske was virtually unstoppable. Together, they had a 4:1 IQ advantage over Andretti.Over the course of their careers Michael Andretti lead 2 laps more at the Indy 500 than Rick Mears, yet Mears won 4 times and Andretti never did.
I was about to waltz in here and be like "holy crap, I said this in the middle of the 2020 MotoGP season only for Marc Marquez to come in last place as a defending champion" but there apparently was a Garrett Gerloff who withdrew from one race, technically making him the true last place finisher, assuming someone who never started a race is even classified in the standings the same way as someone who has at least that one retirement on his record.One thing that popped to my mind about Gabriele Tarquini is that he may just be the only driver to finish first and dead last in consecutive seasons of a world championship, but that's kinda finnicky since the new WTCR doesn't have championship status anymore.
Still, he won that title in 2018 while being classified all the way in the bottom of the 2017 WTCC with a double disqualification to his name.
In 2016, Lewis Hamilton beat his teammate 10 to 9 (I don’t count the double retirement in Spain, nor Lewis’ retirement in Malaysia). Lewis also won 10 wins opposed to Nico’s 9. While not the 15 point gap in the points (while you also failed to mentioned Mansell missing the final 2 GP’s while on a two race winning streak), Nico with the inferior stats did managed to squeak by Lewis for the title.After going down a little bit of a rabbit hole:
In the 1987 Formula One season, Nelson Piquet and Nigel Mansell finished the same race eight times. Mansell finished ahead of Piquet seven times in eight races but Piquet still won the title.
I wonder if there are any other cases, in Formula One or elsewhere, of a driver lagging so far behind in dual finishes yet still coming out on top?
Mario AndrettiIf Chris Amon was an undertaker, people would stop dying.
True. But what constitutes a constructor? Seeing as two in that group are effectively name changes (AT and Alpine).Williams won their first F1 race in 1979.
Since then, only 10 Constructors have won a race for the first time, three of them in the last 2 years! And the four previous were in 2008-09 too.
They're mostly all name changes. The second youngest team on the grid after Haas, depending on how you count it, are either Mercedes (formerly Brawn, Honda, BAR and Tyrrell, although the only carry over from Tyrrell was the company registration number) or Red Bull (formerly Jaguar and Stewart).True. But what constitutes a constructor? Seeing as two in that group are effectively name changes (AT and Alpine).
I thinks it's different when let's say Brawn became Mercedes (as its due to the team geing brought and regrouped just with some of the old assets) than Toro Rosso became Aplha Tauri or Renault became Alpine (which are the exact same team, only changed due to marketing)They're mostly all name changes. The second youngest team on the grid after Haas, depending on how you count it, are either Mercedes (formerly Brawn, Honda, BAR and Tyrrell, although the only carry over from Tyrrell was the company registration number) or Red Bull (formerly Jaguar and Stewart).
In terms of race winners since Williams, the names grouped by actual team are:
- Jordan and Force India
- Stewart and Red Bull
- Toro Rosso and Alpha Tauri (formerly Minardi)
- Benetton, one of the Lotus names, and Alpine (Renault's first victory came in the race before Williams', but that Renault was a different team)
- Honda and Brawn
- BMW Sauber
So 10 (or 11) names. Only 6 actual teams, but what's counted as a constructor is the name.
If a double means that they also won the constructors, then nope. Keke Rosberg took the 1982 drivers' title in a Williams but the constructors' title went to Ferrari.Every Williams drivers' title was a championship double.