- 15,855
- QLD, Australia
- Small_Fryz
I would say they choose them cars because they want to win. If youre that worked up about it and i can clearly see why, maybe you should enforce some different rules, only FR or MR, certain cars not allowed etc.
Imagine driving big americian Vetts, Vipers, Stangs and Camaros around a wet track or on sims. that is definetly skill.
When you set down a the rules for the races each week, my job as a competitor and valiant supporter is to choose the car combination that gives me the best chance to beat my fellow compitors / valiant supporters, Rarely will i choose to drive the slower car. If i want to driver slower cars id go check out Flat outs mini races his set up or compare my times in the Time comparesment thread. But To me WRS is about learning to drive and tune the car to the best of my ability not choosing to drive a slower car, just because i wont win in the fast car. The only way i can truly compare if im getting better or if im any good is to run the fastest car available so then there is no excuses like (oh my car wasnt as fast etc). I really like the challenge i trying to keep up with CFM and Hugo Boss etc, just in the last month ive improved dramatically, if however i choose slower cars on purpose then i wouldnt have been pushed as far, and would not have improved as much. I can understand choosing slower cars everynow and again (week 100) but not often. Its difficult to improve your time if there is noone competiting against you. I ride motobikes and i can always ride faster when im chasing/ being chased by someone then when im on my own.
My point is Kent as the rule maker you have to decide on the rules to make, many people here will try for the outright win, so next time you should consider it from there point of view.
Dont take any of this personally im mearly explaining my opoinin/veiws.
Imagine driving big americian Vetts, Vipers, Stangs and Camaros around a wet track or on sims. that is definetly skill.
When you set down a the rules for the races each week, my job as a competitor and valiant supporter is to choose the car combination that gives me the best chance to beat my fellow compitors / valiant supporters, Rarely will i choose to drive the slower car. If i want to driver slower cars id go check out Flat outs mini races his set up or compare my times in the Time comparesment thread. But To me WRS is about learning to drive and tune the car to the best of my ability not choosing to drive a slower car, just because i wont win in the fast car. The only way i can truly compare if im getting better or if im any good is to run the fastest car available so then there is no excuses like (oh my car wasnt as fast etc). I really like the challenge i trying to keep up with CFM and Hugo Boss etc, just in the last month ive improved dramatically, if however i choose slower cars on purpose then i wouldnt have been pushed as far, and would not have improved as much. I can understand choosing slower cars everynow and again (week 100) but not often. Its difficult to improve your time if there is noone competiting against you. I ride motobikes and i can always ride faster when im chasing/ being chased by someone then when im on my own.
My point is Kent as the rule maker you have to decide on the rules to make, many people here will try for the outright win, so next time you should consider it from there point of view.
Dont take any of this personally im mearly explaining my opoinin/veiws.
👍 If it was all about winning for me, I would have taken the obvious choice in my first race at the Complex String II (WRS 100) - the 094/S car 👎 Instead I went with my good ol' trusty Denso Supra (one of my favorites). Didn't do extremely good with it, but not too bad either.
.
.
