CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,270
- United States
Elaborate.Phrasing.
Elaborate.Phrasing.
Not everyone's mind is in the gutter.
Hence "phrasing".Not everyone's mind is in the gutter.
An exclamation and/or warning given to another over the unintended sexual innuendo of an otherwise innocent phrase.
Not everyone's mind is in the gutter.
(˵ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°˵)Mine certainly isn't when it comes to wood being put to use ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
It's probably a short squeeze. Which is good for the short term, but can cause havoc in the long term for the company. Essentially, it's a huge influx of investors over a short period of time, but it ends up outpricing itself and people can no longer afford the share. Once it plateaus, then you see a massive selloff causing the company to lose a huge chunk of investment. This is problematic if the investment money is already spent.
lol Musk trying to paint himself as if he's JC Denton on Twitter when he's actually Bob Page.
Tesla's cars and SUVs had 250 problems per 100 vehicles, compared with an industry average of 166. The next five worst-scoring brands were Land Rover (228), Audi (225), Volvo (210), Mercedes-Benz (202) and Jaguar (190). In general, luxury brands struggled in the 2020 study in part due to problems with their infotainment systems.
In Tesla's case, though, problems included paint defects, poor fit of body panels, trunks and hoods that were hard to open and close, too much wind noise in the interior, squeaks and rattles, according to J.D. Power's automotive President Doug Betts.
J.D. Power released their Initial Quality Study for 2020, and it seems Tesla hasn't fared so well.
It's a symptom of trying to do too much too fast. Tesla tried to grow its model range before really figuring out all the ins and outs of building a car properly. They also did a poor job at anticipating demand while overworking their employees and more or less treating them like crap. This shows in the final product and is unacceptable in a car that can cost upwards of $100k like the Model S. I get the comment about the infotainment system too, it's awful and difficult to use while driving since everything is controlled through it.
And given that for the longest time Tesla was effectively only competing with itself, since the major automotive groups were dragging their feet on hybrid/EV development until recently and smaller companies were aiming for the boutique supercar market, that less-than-perfect build quality wasn't as much of an issue because of the showcase quality of the technology. But now the more traditional luxury names are stepping up their game (because the EU forced the issue), new companies like Rivian and Lucid are looking to come in and provide direct competition and even Ford is planning key features like hands-free highway driving in F-150s by this time next year, so less than perfect isn't going to be enough pretty soon.I feel like Tesla, more than any other automakers, has one foot in the tech economy, and another in the automotive production industry. Meaning that releasing underdeveloped products now to generate interest and hoard market share (I mean Tesla dominates the EV market) is more important than taking the time to release a "perfect" product. The issue is that you can't really send over a patch to update the bodywork. Tesla is a pretty unique company.
But now the more traditional luxury names are stepping up their game (because the EU forced the issue), new companies like Rivian and Lucid are looking to come in and provide direct competition and even Ford is planning key features like hands-free highway driving in F-150s by this time next year, so less than perfect isn't going to be enough pretty soon.
Lofty goal for Tesla build quality.I feel like perfect is such a strong word, maybe we can use not terrible instead.
Lofty goal for Tesla build quality.
Man, Tesla just closed out the deal on the Gigafactory in Texas for the Cybertruck, etc and I had no idea they were already this far along with clearing the land for it...