- 13,282
- GTPlanet
- Street-King-07
- Quattro Saltire
Trailer for the Scotland special; Lochdown is here
Those two jokes have clearly gone right over your head lol. The Conti as a sports coupe is clearly ridiculous, and the idea that modern American cars could possibly be as garbage as old Soviet cars is a painful reality.I actually enjoyed the special, there were some issues I had with it such as minor dialogue nitpiks. and how one of the challenges didn't seem fully fair. However, I still found some of the jokes funny and the whole road trip through Scottland entertaining enough.
I'll mention a couple of my issues here, just in case noone wants to be spoiled on them:
- Why is Jeremy Clarkson still stating a Lincoln Continental as a sports coupe when they were never built to be sporty? They're just plain not. It was built to be comfy to drive around, that's it. It's not like a BMW M5.
- There was a challenge pinning Soviet Cars against American cars to see I guess which was more durable, but they used 2000s American Cars against 70s and 80s Soviet cars. I liked that the last cars standing were Chryslers, but it feels a bit hollow when they didn't use 70s and 80s American cars instead. Something like a Dodge Omni, Ford Pinto, or Chevrolet Chevette would've been more fair.
Seriously, that's the joke? Just calling it a sports coupe when it's not as a joke? That's the same joke then they pulled in that "Worst Cars in the History of the World" special.Those two jokes have clearly gone right over your head lol. The Conti as a sports coupe is clearly ridiculous
Um no, I did notice what they were doing there. I know very well that some modern American cars were awful. but it was still a dumb comparison when they could've done the same joke with 70s and 80s American cars that were garbage.and the idea that modern American cars could possibly be as garbage as old Soviet cars is a painful reality.
This is the literal, dictionary definition of "irony".Seriously, that's the joke? Just calling it a sports coupe when it's not as a joke?
For UK viewers it's not really that deep in terms of humour, but pretty deep in the sense of how thickly it was laid on. About as subtle as... well, the cars.Anyway, I did some browsing after watching and apparently this film is chock full of references, especially Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein. I honestly didn't pick up on any of them at the time but that's some pretty high-level humor upon reflection. That's one thing I've always loved about these guys, somehow they mix really deep jokes with child's humor and it just flows for them. Big fan.
I know it is, but I thought as a joke that it was dumb. and worst that they ran with that joke for a whole segment.This is the literal, dictionary definition of "irony".
If you mean the Pizza Express/'perfectly normal shooting weekend' section, it was a very long winded Prince Andrew gag. It was unnecessarily long, perhaps solely padding for time.after a joke I apparently missed.
they need to go back to doing real adventures with real challenges, being themselves.
What? Andy Wilman was the executive producer of Top Gear from its inception (2002 Top Gear) to the end around 2015. He's also the executive producer of TGT.Doubt it'll happen as long a Wilman is writing the scripts though.
I know he's always been there, what I meant is that it's with him at the helm that they gradually developed this acted, characterised version of the trio and all the nonsense, comedy angles. He wrote and wanted all that. Unless he goes, it's going to continue. I know they can't do big adventures but they can still do more real challenges and adventures, akin to the cheap car challenges they used to do, or car vs public transport. They were always scripted, but they still felt more real and natural rather than driving like idiots in character because huh hah, French drive bad. Lolz.What? Andy Wilman was the executive producer of Top Gear from its inception (2002 Top Gear) to the end around 2015. He's also the executive producer of TGT.
He drives/drove the comedy and the adventures of both shows. Much of those previous adventures you're craving, he is behind them.
There's not much choice when it comes to film, given the constant bombardment from the media and constantly evolving government regulations. There's a new variant almost every 4 months which brings about the same circus every time without fail.
They want to do large adventures but can't. Can't blame the producer for that.
Haven't watched the latest one yet, but this perfectly sums up my thoughts about Grand Tour and late Top GearI know he's always been there, what I meant is that it's with him at the helm that they gradually developed this acted, characterised version of the trio and all the nonsense, comedy angles. He wrote and wanted all that. Unless he goes, it's going to continue. I know they can't do big adventures but they can still do more real challenges and adventures, akin to the cheap car challenges they used to do, or car vs public transport. They were always scripted, but they still felt more real and natural rather than driving like idiots in character because huh hah, French drive bad. Lolz.
Something Clarkson learned on one of his old shows. Skip to 35 minutesThought its was pretty bad, never really got what they were trying to do, felt like it was all thrown together at the last minute.
Why was May wearing a what looked like a sheet on his head during the two eating scenes??!
Something Clarkson learned on one of his old shows. Skip to 35 minutes