The Homosexuality Discussion Thread

[TheeFrogmanlego]

Gay supporters will pull anything out there ass , monkey eat **** to. And may I add I said it biologically wrong since the only reason we mate is to reproduce * not survival of our species*. That poor dog wont spread his genes and is a biological failure like gays. And yes I did say it wrong morally because it is, your the ones throwing out ten thousand years out the window. and if there is a god or a superior being who created us , hes chuckling every time they put appendage d in slot a saying.. fail. Like putting my car keys in the exhaust.

 

[Daniel]

This will be hilarious.

Which god says it's not meant to be? The concept of marriage predates all modern religions. They've been doing it longer than you've been condemning it. You and your religion don't own marriage. You and your religion don't even own the concept of god. That predates your religion as well.

+1. If marriage should only be between a heterosexual couple, why are so many other OT customs/laws disregarded today? If the sole reason for marriage is reproduction, would sterile couples go to hell?

 

[Zenith]

Is it a trend now to assume people with different attitutdes/ mind concepts are little kids now?

No, I suspect that they are adolescents when they demonstrate the grammar of an adolescent.

The suspecting stops when they fail to Google a five letter word before cursing at someone.

Remember when I said that this would be hilarious? Hilarity ensued.

 

[Terronium-12]

Obviously its in the Bible. And its spelled trip, A** hole.

That's one.

 

[Azuremen]

Reason it doesn't work out, because its not meant to be. Who says? God, oh you don't believe there's a god, then don't reply to me and move on.

Well, you are certainly coming in here with an open mind.

Oh wait...

 

[Daniel]

No, I suspect that they are adolescents when they demonstrate the grammar of an adolescent.

The suspecting stops when they fail to Google a five letter word before cursing at someone.

Remember when I said that this would be hilarious? Hilarity ensued.

Shut up, Zenith. You're so full of trip

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

+1. If marriage should only be between a heterosexual couple, why are so many other OT customs/laws disregarded today? If the sole reason for marriage is reproduction, would sterile couples go to hell?

Marriage by LAW is union between a man and woman. Many women rights supporters during the progressives sought to abolish it due to the fact the union was an economical bondage that made the woman to an extent dependent * at the time they were*. they can have civil union but no, gays want marriage.

 

[Zenith]

Shut up, Zenith. You're so full of trip

Marriage by LAW is union between a man and woman.

Which kind law do you speak of? Natural? American? Religious?

No matter which one you choose, your point really doesn't work.

Many women rights supporters during the progressives sought to abolish it due to the fact the union was an economical bondage that made the woman to an extent dependent * at the time they were*. they can have civil union but no, gays want marriage.

Why do you get to decide that gay marriage cannot exist? We've already covered that religion does not own the concept of God or Marriage.

 

[Daniel]

That's funny, because at one point interracial marriage was also against the LAW.

 

[G.T.Ace]

Not sure if it's hilarious, or actually really sad.
By the way, regarding that Bible stuff:

Couldn't resist.

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

Which kind law do you speak of? Natural? American? Religious?

No matter which one you choose, your point really doesn't work.



Why do you get to decide that gay marriage cannot exist? We've already covered that religion does not own the concept of God or Marriage.

Religion was not mentioned , your arguing with a person who's majoring law at CSUR. OPEN YOUR EYES Oh and go do what monkeys do at the zoo, because its "natural" or what dogs do http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGrdSto_w_U yup were suppose to do that.

 

[Azuremen]

Marriage by LAW is union between a man and woman. Many women rights supporters during the progressives sought to abolish it due to the fact the union was an economical bondage that made the woman to an extent dependent * at the time they were*. they can have civil union but no, gays want marriage.

I really want to know what you are attempting to do with the asterisk you keep tossing into your posts. Oh, and law is defined by man so we can change law. In fact, that has already happened in the State I live in, and several others.

The way you post and the words you choose to use remind me heavily of this article here.

Religion was not mentioned , your arguing with a person who's majoring law at CSUR. OPEN YOUR EYES Oh and go do what monkeys do at the zoo, because its "natural" or what dogs do http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGrdSto_w_U yup were suppose to do that.

What is CSUR? And if you are majoring in anything with your current level of English, I'm going to suspect you're at best a Freshmen, and more likely just making it up. Otherwise there are apparently zero admission standards where you are at.

 

[Lizard]

Is it a trend now to assume people with different attitutdes/ mind concepts are little kids now?

No. We accept differing opinions but we don't accept people who can't deal with criticism without calling others names.

 

[G.T.Ace]

And if you are majoring in anything with your current level of English, I'm going to suspect you're at best a Freshmen, and more likely just making it up. Otherwise there are apparently zero admission standards where you are at.

👍

Seriously, it's really hard to argue with someone, who can't properly write in his own language.

 

[Zenith]

Religion was not mentioned , your arguing with a person who's majoring law at CSUR. OPEN YOUR EYES Oh and go do what monkeys do at the zoo, because its "natural" or what dogs do http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGrdSto_w_U yup were suppose to do that.

So you're comparing two men or women sharing a potentially lifelong bond to a dog eating poop.

Your "qualifications" are dismal. You are not an authority on marriage or really anything. I asked you what law defines marriage as between a man and a woman. You have not provided it. Telling me to OPEN MY EYES is a pretty poor strategy for arguing. It affects your credibility. If you plan on becoming a lawyer, you should reevaluate your strategies.

Be sure to tell CSUR that their writing classes could use some work.

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

👍

Seriously, it's really hard to argue with someone, who can't properly write in his own language.

Considering I learned English in the 4th grade.. not to shabby.

 

[Terronium-12]

Considering I learned English in the 4th grade.. not to shabby.

You should be able to differentiate between "to" and "too" then. Only the latter is applicable here, not the former.

 

[Daniel]

AFAIK that "union between man and woman" thing is trip(e) because there have been multiple law changes in my lifetime, and I'm only 17.
EDIT: Tree'd by everyone. I should really stop using the app on a debate

 

[Azuremen]

Considering I learned English in the 4th grade.. not to shabby.

Oddly enough, I learned to spell and write in the 4th grade. I was illiterate prior to that. You will notice I don't confuse "there," "they're," and "their" nor do I mix up "too" and "to." And I know how to use punctuation correctly.

As for CSUR, where is this at again? CSU would make some sense, as your location is Downey.

 

[G.T.Ace]

Considering I learned English in the 4th grade.. not to shabby.

I never learned English in school, because I couldn't visit it thanks to a handicap. Your argument is invalid.








Sorry for the slight trolling.

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

AFAIK that "union between man and woman" thing is trip(e) because there have been multiple law changes in my lifetime, and I'm only 17.
EDIT: Tree'd by everyone. I should really stop using the app on a debate

Yes It is not in the constitution, and according to article nine of the bill of rights everything not mentioned in the federal documents is left up to the states. I'm all for gay marriage, But its incorrect and ill stand by my views and as long as my state abolishes it so be it, what your arguing about is national legalization something I will not stand for.

 

[Lizard]

I'm all for gay marriage, But its incorrect

Small contradiction there.

Oh did I say small? I meant large.

 

[Terronium-12]

Yes It is not in the constitution, and according to article nine of the bill of rights everything not mentioned in the federal documents is left up to the states. I'm all for gay marriage, But its incorrect and ill stand by my views and as long as my state abolishes it so be it, what your arguing about is national legalization something I will not stand for.

You just called them biological defects, what on earth do you mean "I'm all for gay marriage"?

What?

 

[dice1998]

I'm all for gay marriage

Wow! That's a quick marriage to a family member then!

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

Oddly enough, I learned to spell and write in the 4th grade. I was illiterate prior to that. You will notice I don't confuse "there," "they're," and "their" nor do I mix up "too" and "to." And I know how to use punctuation correctly.

As for CSUR, where is this at again? CSU would make some sense, as your location is Downey.

University of riverside, also known as UCR , got in as a freshmen. Almost went to CSUF and CSULB or UCLA , the first two are close, but there call states.The one I went to is a long drive, luckily my uncle rents me a room in his home.

 

[TheeFrogmanlego]

You all were quick to judge. Teach what you preach. ;P just saying you know. I believe the acts are wrong immoral , and it should be abolished in states were the vast majority of people deem it wrong , but I'm not gonna impose my beliefs on others and neither should any of you. Let it be if the people decide to but don't force others to accept it. I wont stand by nationwide Legalization but its up to the state itself to decide weather IT'S PEOPLE agree with it. I don't but they can get married if they can, so hell I'm all for it, but I'm not going to go force it upon me people who deem it as immoral.

 

[dice1998]

You all were quick to judge. Teach what you preach. ;P just saying you know.

You're one to say that 💡

 

[Lizard]

You all were quick to judge. Teach what you preach. ;P just saying you know.

Hmm.

Says the one who was very quick to come to the conclusion that legalising gay marriage will lead to incest with no proof at all.

 

[Zenith]

You all were quick to judge. Teach what you preach. ;P just saying you know.

So when you compared gay marriage to putting car keys in the exhaust you were what - being facetious?

What about when you compared gay marriage to incest or marrying a dog? Was that also just to throw us off your scent?

"2+2 = 5."

"No, fool. It doesn't"

"I'm all for 2+2 =4. You were all quick to judge! Teach what you preach!"

I award you no points. Try again.

 

[sesselpupser]

You all were quick to judge. Teach what you preach. ;P just saying you know.

What does any of this post mean? Do you think we now believe you're for gay marriage? You've really got your work cut out for you if you're training to be a lawyer. That's a bad thing, by the way.