The Hot Mom Car II - Looks like we're getting a C5 (post 82)

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 94 comments
  • 4,100 views

///M-Spec

Staff Emeritus
4,928
Christmas time is upon us again. And with that time of the year also comes that white fluffy stuff that slows commutes to a crawl and makes a simple trip to the grocery store a pain. Luckily, mid-winter also brings low APR rates on manufacturer subsidized loans and subvented lease rates.

These two conditions are conspiring to make us consider trading in our 2005 Nissan Murano SL FWD Touring for a fun, stylish but still practical AWD family car.

Our Mo' has been good to us. It is roomy, well built and nice to look at and drive. But we need an AWD replacement sooner or later... and she's been make noises about being ready to go back to a sedan. Thus, I've spent the last few weekends building cars on websites and kicking tires on dealer lots. I thought I would share my thoughts and shopping experiences, and invite any comments, debate, cheers or jeers on our final contestants.

This is not a traditional "what should I get?" thread. That's mostly because at the end of the day, my wife is going to pick what she likes and not even your humble narrator is going to budge her on it.

This is what we’ve tried so far. With the exception of the Murano AWD, these are all '08s. There will be an all new '09 Murano this spring and we will probably consider that as well. At the moment, we are also considering some cars that are 1-2 years old, but 3 years or more are out.

Without further ado, the candidates. So we are comparing apples to apples, the price below is the MSRP equipped as we want them, not base price. In all cases, cars are optioned with minimum All Wheel Drive, Xenon HID headlights, a moonroof, powered memory leather heated seats and sports package (if available). These are what I consider "must have" options. Bluetooth, harddrive music players and other geegaws are selected only if you have to buy into a package they belong to in order to get a must-have feature.




Infiniti G35x AWD (Premium and Sport Packages)
I've driven this car twice now and to put it bluntly, it rocks. The G really does deliver BMW level performance for less money. Handling is excellent and the VQ delivers great thrust. The interior is very agreeable and Nissan has some pretty good financing offers. My only lament is the bland exterior styling and sadly uninteresting color choices. In terms of blingin' it, the CTS has it covered by a country mile. But as much as I like the new Caddy, the G is the one I want in our driveway most.

CLIFF’S NOTES: I’ll take one in Lakeshore Slate.

Cadillac CTS4 (Performance Collection, Sunroof)
My wife is big on this car. She comes from a family of Caddy owners (her grandmother buys a brand new Deville (now DTS) every 3 years) and is pleased that they are finally making a car that she actually wants.

Some of you may have read my first drive impressions of this car. My wife and I went down to the local Cadillac dealer on Saturday where she drove one for the first time and I had my second turn at the wheel.

My second drive was quite a bit more revealing than my first, for several reasons: First, we drove a 263hp CTS RWD with the FE2 suspension (Performance Collection) back to back with the G35x AWD on the same roads. I also spent the last 2 days in a BMW 335i loaner car while my M Roadster was in for service and warranty work. This allowed me to really compare the CTS in light of it's primary rivals on the same roads.

After my second drive, I have to revise my opinion of the CTS. I will post an updated driving impression later this week. I’ll just say that the CTS has a different character than either the Infiniti or the BMW, and plays its strengths very well. But that ultimate edge as a driver’s car still goes to BMW, with the Infiniti a close second, by a hair’s width.

CLIFF’S NOTES: Trumped by the Infinti in the fun-to-drive dept, but gets revenge in the styling dept. Options add up fast on this car. I’ll still happily take one.

Mazda CX-9 AWD Grand Touring
Now this is quite possibly the best handling 4500 lb. vehicle I've ever driven. If it had about 100 more hp, it would probably give Cayenne drivers a nasty surprise on a back road.

At first, it looks like a direct competitor to the Murano, except it's bigger, heavier and seats 7. The CX-7, on the other hand seems much closer to a Rogue than a Murano. It sounds to me like Mazda is following a strategy of straddling it's main rivals in size, if not price.

The interior materials are very good for the low 30k class and easily surpass the Murano in subjective quality. They have a upscale, premium feel and all the controls move with a delicate precision. In fact, everything is closer to the Infinti and Cadillac in look and feel. At $38k, the car is totally loaded with goodies and lacks only navigation (which we don't want anyway). The third row will come in very hand when we have out of town guests (and their children!).

The only feature that raised my eyebrows is the center instrument cluster. The Grand Touring model gives you a high-tech looking electroluminescent gauge cluster, and it glows in an absolutely bizarre shades of orange, hot pink over purple like a radioactive Slurpie machine. It's strangely incongruous with the rest of the business-class interior... like meeting a suburban soccer mom with nose piercing and spiked blue hair.

CLIFF’S NOTES: 0.0% APR financing gives ‘ole Two-and-a-half-Tons-of-Fun a fighting chance.

Volvo XC70 (Premium and Climate Packages)
In stark contrast to the funky, offbeat Mazda is the stoic Swede. I think Volvo has finally given up trying to do "Sport" and instead is concentrating on what it does best: practical, safe and conservative. This car is the equivalent of getting your date home by 10PM on prom night.

The XC70 is solid, well built and has an absolutely lovely interior. My tester had Sandstone Beige leather and it is one of the yummiest looking I've ever seen. The seats, steering wheel and upper dash is covered in a light creamy beige roughly the color of a Lindt's white chocolate bar. It looks so damn good, I almost leaned over to lick the steering wheel. Almost.

At night, the dash glows an icy blue. There is even a sort of spot-light that shines down on the gauges from the cluster lining. Different and cool. Everything is hushed and easy. The way it goes down the road is very Lexus.

Unfortunately, if the ride is inspired by Lexus, the spongy handling is definitely 1970s Detroit. The steering is accurate and body control is good. But the suspension travel is loooooong and roll motions are downright nautical in feel. The XC70 will take set and let you manhandle it into a corner, but does so in the same deeply unenthusiastic way that cats swim.

CLIFF’S NOTES: The Good - A great place to be. The Bad – As long as you drive straight ahead.

BMW 328xi Sport Wagon (Sport Package, Bi-xenons, Leather, Heated seats, Seat Mem.)
It was decided early on that the E90 sedan was simply too small for our needs. The added versatility of the E91 wagon kept it from getting cut. It is also the only car on our list I haven't driven yet because I don't have to; it's a 3 series and I know them well enough to write volumes about them (and I have).

People who have never driven a 3-series before sometimes wonder what the fuss is all about. Certainly on paper at least, the 328 doesn’t look like anything special. It’s way down on power, de-contented of premium gizmos that are costly to put back on and a little tight in the back seat.

But all you need to do is start one up and drive 100 feet down the road. One degree of steering wheel travel turns into instantaneous action and imparts a feeling of total precision and control; but it somehow delivers this without dartiness or rock hard springs and solid bushings. You’ll either ‘get it’ or you won’t. It’s okay if you don’t. There’s a nice quiet, comfortable and supremely well-built Lexus for you down the street. But for those of us who ‘get it’, it doesn’t get much better than this.

But because rear seat accommodations and trunk space is a big consideration, we may well pass on the 328xi wagon, since every car but the Audi is bigger. If we need fun, there's always the Z4.

CLIFF’S NOTES: I like BMWs. There’s a shock.

Audi A4 Avant 3.2 quattro (Cold Weather and Convenience Packages)
This is the swan song for the B7, itself a mild rework of the PL46 B6. The B8 is only a few short months away, so that means I've had some pretty sweet deals waved in my face on this car. Very slightly smaller than the E91 inside, the Avant hangs on by the skin of its teeth, mostly because my local dealers are scrambling to give these cars away before the B8 arrives.

I sampled a car several weeks ago. Unfortunately, the only Avant on their lot at the time and it was a 2.0T with Tiptronic and the base suspension. The 200 hp motor saddled with the extra weight of the Avant body, quattro drivetrain and slushbox seriously sapped it's power and as a result, the car felt a little lazy. While the suspension soaked up any trouble the road had to offer, the steering was mostly oblivious to what the front wheels were doing and cornering was a leisurely affair.

It was however, meticulously assembled, appointed and built, with class leading subjective quality on all the primary controls and switch gear. As with the BMW, the rear seats are a little tight and the front seats seem a little too close together for a long trip.

Still, the great deals floating around on this car means I owe it a second drive –with a 6 speed, sports suspension and the FSI 3.2. If I can find one, that is.

CLIFF’S NOTES: The good – Irreproachable design and interior build quality. Handsome inside and out. Good value compared to the Bimmer. The bad – Smallish; Not a precision tool for spirited driving.


M
 
I would get the caddy. Beemer's are meant to be rubbish in awd form from what I have read in german car mags and the A4 is getting replaced soon as you have said by a vehicle that is top notch on par with the 3er and new c-class.

So unless you waited for the new A4 id go with the caddy.
 
Thought time!

Infiniti G35X: I give Nissan a lot of credit for this car, it really is a screamer at a truly "bargain" price, but from what I've seen of the car, it becomes clear that corners have occasionally been cut. The quality, simply put, just doesn't seem up-to-snuff with the Cadillacs and BMWs of the world.

Cadillac CTS4 FE2: Of course I'd love to push for GM products whenever possible, but as others have noted on the car before, you've really got to like the outside before you can like it everywhere else. I personally love the car, Motor Trend and Car and Driver do as well. Its a good value, but like others here, I'd happily pay more for the BMW as well.

BMW 328xi Sport: What a lovely, lovely machine. I haven't driven an E90 yet, but if its anything like its predecessor, I'd happily pay whatever they want for it. Against the updated CTS and the new G35, it appears as though the competition is getting closer, but lets be honest, the BMW is still the best. I just wish it was a bit cheaper in the end...

Audi A4: I agree with forza2.0, wait for the updated one.

Nissan Murano: I've never been a fan, but I've heard a lot of good press about it. Like the Audi, I'd wait for the updated model.

Mazda CX-9: It did win SUV of the Year for 2007, so thats a bonus, but I'd be so much happier with a CX-7. It always depends on what you want as a driver, but the bigger one just doesn't do it for me. Compared to the others, much like the Nissan, it would sit closer to the bottom of the list for fairly obvious prestige reasons. But for the fact that it actually drives well, its always worth being considered.

Volvo XC70: I like this update, but I don't know enough about the car to say anything either way.

===

Suggestions

Okay, its not a "what do you think?" thread, but I do have to ask if you've looked at a Buick Enclave yet. They're selling quite well, have quite a good reputation for quality and performance, and my God are they good-looking. I saw one yesterday in this pale blue/green metallic with the chrome, a truly beautiful crossover.

These two may be a bit odd, but what about the Ford Taurus/X or the upcoming Ford Flex? They certainly would be the right size, certainly would be well-under the $40K mark even when fully-loaded, and come with most of the standard fare you wish (Did I mention that FordSync is awesome?!?). The new AWD systems matched with the 3.5L V6 work well, and you really can't fault the Ford/GM 6-speed box in there either.

...Just three more to maybe consider...
 
I wouldn't consider the Volvo based solely on the "first model year" thing. That's just a recipe for hell, particularly with Volvos.
 
B]Volvo XC70 (Premium and Climate Packages)[/B]
In stark contrast to the funky, offbeat Mazda is the stoic Swede. I think Volvo has finally given up trying to do "Sport" and instead is concentrating on what it does best: practical, safe and conservative. This car is the equivalent of getting your date home by 10PM on prom night.

The XC70 is solid, well built and has an absolutely lovely interior. My tester had Sandstone Beige leather and it is one of the yummiest looking I've ever seen. The seats, steering wheel and upper dash is covered in a light creamy beige roughly the color of a Lindt's white chocolate bar. It looks so damn good, I almost leaned over to lick the steering wheel. Almost.

At night, the dash glows an icy blue. There is even a sort of spot-light that shines down on the gauges from the cluster lining. Different and cool. Everything is hushed and easy. The way it goes down the road is very Lexus.

Unfortunately, if the ride is inspired by Lexus, the spongy handling is definitely 1970s Detroit. The steering is accurate and body control is good. But the suspension travel is loooooong and roll motions are downright nautical in feel. The XC70 will take set and let you manhandle it into a corner, but does so in the same deeply unenthusiastic way that cats swim.

CLIFF’S NOTES: The Good - A great place to be. The Bad – As long as you drive straight ahead.

From experience with a 2000 model, I think you hit the car spot on. Our interior is nice, probably not what you would get in a more premium vehicle, but it has leather and a few fancy gizmos, pretty slick for 2000. Not to mention that the thing feels bulletproof and very safe. The car doesn't really spend much time in the shop either. And it is a good size too. We have packed four grown adults (My sister and I being teenagers, but much taller than average), a ten year old and all the gear for a few days in that thing.

All of this is fine and dandy until you turn on the engine though. We have the turbo model, but power still is a weakness. If you put your foot to the floor, it will give a pretty rewarding push with first gear taking it over 45. But the thing is definitely a highway cruiser. Lane changes and quick acceleration that leave a huge grin on my face in the GTI just leave me very disappointed in the XC70. Merging into a faster lane is a problem too. Faster cars will have no problems jumping into the lane and getting to speed reasonably quick, but this car requires a large gap. I managed to get a dump truck right behind me in a poorly thought out move that would not have been an issue in other cars.

But as soon as you have to use the steering wheel, things just go downhill. i would say that it feels like a blob would in corners. Steering is very light and it feels like the suspension has to settle before the car reacts to steering inputs, often causing late apexes and things. I would go so far to say that quick corners begin to feel quite unsafe. Weight and the soft ride can really be felt in the turns. Don't forget that at least our car is quite nose-heavy so front tire wear can get a bit worse than the rears with spirited driving.

Other small nitpicks? We have a horrible brake pedal, but that could just be bad adjustment. The clock reads quite bad gas mileage. it could just be my driving, but it isn't uncommon for me to see less than 20 mpg. And I think 23ish is about right for what we usually get. I also find myself going well below the speed limit without other traffic to pace me. It just isn't in any way rewarding to drive quickly. And of course, my dad who has had much more experience driving cars than me says that despite it's great Volvo disguise, you can see bits of Ford pop out from time to time.

Overall, it is a nice car, and looks great for being an 80,000 mile brick from the prehistoric 2000 model year. It isn't a performance car at all and I think that highway cruiser is probably the best way to describe it.

But definitely consider that I am 19, like to go quickly, drive a GTI, have a grudge against the car ever since we picked it over the 9-5 back when we bought it, and most of all, it is 8 years old with quite high mileage. Some of these issues might have been fixed, others might have arisen, but it seems like you saw a pretty similar experience overall.

Good luck on your car search! Of the ones you listed, I would say that I would prefer the Beamer, but it's impracticality for your purposes would make me lean toward the Infiniti. That is a pretty good list though. And I am impressed to see an American car up there. Great research as well.
 
Nissan Murano = most terrible SUV ever. It has a huge blind spot and the whole dash pops off like a total POS.
 
Beemer's are meant to be rubbish in awd form from what I have read in german car mags <SNIP>

I've driven several xDrive BMWs, including the 328xi sedan, 330xi sedan, X3 and new X5. Just not the wagon. I don't see a problem with their AWD system. It's not the best system out there, but neither is it 'rubbish'.


Infiniti G35X: I give Nissan a lot of credit for this car, it really is a screamer at a truly "bargain" price, but from what I've seen of the car, it becomes clear that corners have occasionally been cut. The quality, simply put, just doesn't seem up-to-snuff with the Cadillacs and BMWs of the world.

I actually thought the G was pretty consistently well built. The next time you're in a CTS, check out some of these areas.

-Sunvisors
-Lock/Unlock button
-Driver's side window switch array
-Front dome lights

They're all a little on the cheap side. Granted, if you look hard enough, you can find cheap bits in the BMW and Infiniti as well. But I don't think the CTS exactly rules this area. Yes, they went from bottom of the barrel to fully competitive within 2 generations, so they deserve huge applause.. but let's not get carried away here.

Suggestions

Okay, its not a "what do you think?" thread, but I do have to ask if you've looked at a Buick Enclave yet. They're selling quite well, have quite a good reputation for quality and performance, and my God are they good-looking. I saw one yesterday in this pale blue/green metallic with the chrome, a truly beautiful crossover.

These two may be a bit odd, but what about the Ford Taurus/X or the upcoming Ford Flex? They certainly would be the right size, certainly would be well-under the $40K mark even when fully-loaded, and come with most of the standard fare you wish (Did I mention that FordSync is awesome?!?). The new AWD systems matched with the 3.5L V6 work well, and you really can't fault the Ford/GM 6-speed box in there either.

...Just three more to maybe consider...

I dunno. Last time I drove a Buick (it was a Regal) I was wishing I wasn't. But it can't hurt to give it a try.

Already did the Taurus wagon thing about 10 years ago. My first inclination is to say: "I'll pass, thanks." Lots of bad blood there.

----

@philly cheese Great post! 👍

----

Nissan Murano = most terrible SUV ever. It has a huge blind spot and the whole dash pops off like a total POS.

I happen to think the Murano is an excellent crossover SUV. We've had ours for over 2 years now and never once was the blind spot an issue. On the driver's side it accounts for a trivial range of vision and the passenger side can be completely mitigated by correctly adjusted mirrors. When I sit in the car, a normal person can walk from the hood in a complete circle around the car and I have ZERO problems seeing him either directly or with my mirrors. Hell, my tiny little Z4 has a bigger blind spot than the Murano when the top is up.

And our whole dash has never so much as made a squeak, much less than "pop off like a total POS". In fact, in over 2 years of ownership, the 'most terrible SUV ever' has yet to need to make an unscheduled stop at a Nissan service dept. Everything still works perfectly in our car. My wife even left the moonroof open once and the sky poured rain on the interior for several hours. And not so much as a lightbulb shorted out or stopped working. Murano 👍


M
 
Hmm.... It seems that the perfect car here would be a CTS Wagon. Oh well. I'd go for the CX-9 or the G35 or the CTS.


But, I'm also going to push the Enclave. Very nice car.
 
The choice would come down to this I think:
  1. Do you want something sporty that can do other things?
  2. Do you want something super safe, completely uncompromisably (new word) comfortable?
  3. Do you want a "jack-of-all-trades"?
  4. Do you want something "different"?
The value for money when you buy the G or the CX-9 is astounding. As much as I love Nissans and sports cars of any type, my ultimate choice is going to be the Mazda. And here's why...

I'll start by saying everything on your list minus the CTS and BMW is brilliant...but the Murano while brilliant it lacks in the seating department. And actually I'd buy the CX-7/Edge before I'd buy the Murano...and I don't know why. The CX-9 has it all as far as I'm concerned; it handles VERY well, is insanely comfy in every seat in it, has enough power for what you need and a little fun, can tow some jet skis/fishing boat if need be, the interior is top-notch, the stereo is surprisingly good considering the cabin setup, and finally it looks European--which is a good thing. The looks are easily the #2 reason why I think its the best Mazda on sale today...or at least tied with the Mazdaspeed6.

My breakdowns:
G - My favorite mid-sized sport saloon. My only gripe is the lack of more power to match the Germans.
CTS - I hate it. Is that pithy?
Murano - The looks are an acquired taste--which I have acquired. But, my main gripe is the lack of seating...and it needs slightly more power.
CX-9 - The list of bad points on this car you can count on one finger for me, needs more power? Mazdaspeed CX-9?
XC70 - This is just an awsome car all the way around, my only gripe is that Volvo just hasn't managed to make it sporty.
338xi - I just don't like it. The looks are iffy, it lacks the space of a Volvo, Audi, or Merc estate. Lacks enough power to make me happy.
A4 Advant - My only complaint is the good engine choices cost a bit. Otherwise, this is a brilliant car inside and out.

MY WILD CARD!

Infiniti FX:
2008-FX35.jpg


It has the presence of royalty, it goes like stink, it can have more power than the Murano, and it handes so good you wouldn't even believe you were driving an SUV. I'm not joking, it handles like a G35 coupe. And it makes a particularly awsome noise, and I rather love the interior. http://robson.m3rlin.org/cars/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/infiniti_fx_45_interior.jpg

Thought time!

Infiniti G35X: I give Nissan a lot of credit for this car, it really is a screamer at a truly "bargain" price, but from what I've seen of the car, it becomes clear that corners have occasionally been cut. The quality, simply put, just doesn't seem up-to-snuff with the Cadillacs and BMWs of the world.

Sometimes your GM bias is way too strong. The Infiniti is every bit as good as a BMW...infact I prefer them more. I believe Infiniti has caught up and is starting to pass BMW on several key areas. If Nismo ever starts seriously tuning some Infiniti models to compete with the M division as well as AMG they would be right up there. *edit* And I forgot to mention that Cadillac has a long way to go to be mentioned in the same breath as the Germans. Lexus and Infiniti are there, Cadillac isn't. Plain and simple.

Nissan Murano = most terrible SUV ever. It has a huge blind spot and the whole dash pops off like a total POS.

Hah, you obviously haven't seen anything from China.
 
I actually kind of like the current Murano, and I think I&#8217;ll really like the &#8217;09 model (though I&#8217;m not too hot on the Rogue taillights, but everything else looks great).

You have a good list there, though seriously, take out the Volvo &#8211; you know you&#8217;re not going to buy it. ;)

Have you already considered an Acura MDX? I don&#8217;t particularly like it (I sat in one and thought the interior was less inviting than my car&#8217;s all-black interior), but I figured I&#8217;d throw that in there.

BTW, I&#8217;m slightly confused about your criteria. For example, why are you considering both a CX-9 and a G35? A CX-7 and a G35 are much closer in specs. I understand what you&#8217;re saying about a CX-7 being smaller than your Murano, but if you don&#8217;t want smaller, then why are you considering any sedans? :confused:
 
Hah, you obviously haven't seen anything from China.

Haha; true.

So, anyway, I was at the car show and went in a Murano. It has all this flimsy plastic crap all over the gauge cluster. I pulled at it a little bit and the whole damn cluster face popped off. I was like, WOW WHAT A POS, and after seeing the clutch pedal which is actually an e-brake in the AT Altima coupe I ran away from the Nissan section.
 
Sometimes your GM bias is way too strong. The Infiniti is every bit as good as a BMW...infact I prefer them more. I believe Infiniti has caught up and is starting to pass BMW on several key areas. If Nismo ever starts seriously tuning some Infiniti models to compete with the M division as well as AMG they would be right up there. *edit* And I forgot to mention that Cadillac has a long way to go to be mentioned in the same breath as the Germans. Lexus and Infiniti are there, Cadillac isn't. Plain and simple.

I'd say that, generally speaking, in the segment my BMW bias is far-too-strong. I understand your point, the G35 is damn-good, but its just a bit too hard-edged and really seems (at least to me) to be trying too hard to beat the Germans.

And, on a final note, if the CTS wasn't a good car, it wouldn't have won COTY and a 10-Best spot. Its a damn-good car, easily placing among the Germans these days...
 
Haha; true.

So, anyway, I was at the car show and went in a Murano. It has all this flimsy plastic crap all over the gauge cluster. I pulled at it a little bit and the whole damn cluster face popped off. I was like, WOW WHAT A POS, and after seeing the clutch pedal which is actually an e-brake in the AT Altima coupe I ran away from the Nissan section.

First of all the interiors are better than any American competitor and secondly if that's what causes you to think that they are "POS" then you really need to learn to have an open mind. And as for the faceplate its designed to do that--its a screwless design. Sheesh...

I'd say that, generally speaking, in the segment my BMW bias is far-too-strong. I understand your point, the G35 is damn-good, but its just a bit too hard-edged and really seems (at least to me) to be trying too hard to beat the Germans.

And, on a final note, if the CTS wasn't a good car, it wouldn't have won COTY and a 10-Best spot. Its a damn-good car, easily placing among the Germans these days...

I didn't say the CTS is complete crap, I just said I hate it. And that it can't compete with the Germans. The STS is the one which gets it all right. (and the SRX) The only issue that people might have with a G is that it is sporty first and soft comfy ride second. Though, I personally feel that it does both very well like Mercedes and Audi.
 
///M-Spec
CLIFF&#8217;S NOTES: I like BMWs. There&#8217;s a shock.

:lol:

I'll make another push to look at a Buick Enclave. That aside, If you know and love BMW, go for the 3. There's nothing wrong with going on a family road trip with a wagon full of things and actually enjoying the drive, is there?

But if it will be driven by your wife, and she loves the Cadillac, go for the CTS. 👍
 
Knowing ///M-Spec&#8217;s personality and car history, I can&#8217;t possibly imagine him buying an Enclave over&#8230; well, anything on that list (aside from the Volvo). It&#8217;s a good SUV, but you&#8217;re all probably preaching to the wrong man. ;)

(Not that I mean to be speaking for him. But seriously, a garage with a Buick Enclave and a BMW Z4 M roadster? :lol:)
 
The choice would come down to this I think:
  1. Do you want something sporty that can do other things?
  2. Do you want something super safe, completely uncompromisably (new word) comfortable?
  3. Do you want a "jack-of-all-trades"?
  4. Do you want something "different"?

BTW, I&#8217;m slightly confused about your criteria. For example, why are you considering both a CX-9 and a G35? A CX-7 and a G35 are much closer in specs. I understand what you&#8217;re saying about a CX-7 being smaller than your Murano, but if you don&#8217;t want smaller, then why are you considering any sedans? :confused:

Yeah, the selection process seems a little odd, doesn't it?

Basically, what we NEED is a direct replacement for the Murano, but with AWD. That means the current as well as the all new Murano is automatically on the list, as well as the CX-9, which brings a better price and more seating to the table.

What we WANT is something more fun to drive. So while the practically of a crossover-ute is a strong consideration, she is willing to give up some of that in order to get something sporty, stylish and fun.. what she calls a "Hot Mom Car", if you will.

She loves the way the new CTS looks. And it happens to be big enough that she's willing to trade the SUV/wagon configuration to get one. The G35 was my pick, since it is almost identical in size and also undercuts the Caddy by a couple grand. PLUS Nissan/Infinti is running 2.9% APR this month on it.

The Volvo came into the picture when I was picking up my dad (who has a XC90) from a service appt. about a week ago. I was checking out the new C30 (which has a wicked cool steering wheel, btw) and fell in love with the XC70's beige interior. I just HAD to know if it was a decent drive.

So if we were looking at wagons, Audi and BMW automatically get invites. In sedan format, the A4 and 328 are slightly too small. But in wagon form, the extra versatility keeps them in the running.

Make sense?


338xi - I just don't like it. The looks are iffy, it lacks the space of a Volvo, Audi, or Merc estate.

The E91 3-series wagon has more rear leg room than the B7 Avant and also has a slightly larger cargo area (60.9 cubic feet vs. 59.0 cubic feet). This is despite the A4 being more than 2 inches longer and almost 5 inches wider.

The XC70 is 5-series sized. And we don't get a C-class wagon. E-class wagon is way, way out of our price range.


MY WILD CARD!

Infiniti FX:
2008-FX35.jpg

FX = Very nice. It's much pricier than the G given the same options, but I'll give it a good look.

Have you already considered an Acura MDX? I don&#8217;t particularly like it (I sat in one and thought the interior was less inviting than my car&#8217;s all-black interior), but I figured I&#8217;d throw that in there.

I've actually driven one and think it's the dog's bollocks. But if you want HID headlights, Acura makes you buy their Sport Package, which is $5,600 :rolleyes: If I buy a TL, I'll take a Sport Package... If I buy a 4,500 lbs. ute, I'm not gonna bother.

You have a good list there, though seriously, take out the Volvo &#8211; you know you&#8217;re not going to buy it. ;)

I really wanted to like this car. Owning a Volvo would make me feel so.. grown up. :lol:


So, anyway, I was at the car show and went in a Murano. It has all this flimsy plastic crap all over the gauge cluster. I pulled at it a little bit and the whole damn cluster face popped off. I was like, WOW WHAT A POS,

So let me get this straight.

You sit in a particular car whose sole mission in life is to sit there for 12 hours a day, so that it can be prodded, poked, pulled at and generally molested by the unwashed masses, hundreds at a time for a week or more... so some like you can vandalize it and thereby declare it a POS.

Did it maybe occur to you that the trim piece you describe may have already been broken loose by the combined efforts of dozens of people just like you?

And I'd be pretty impressed if you managed to pop off the "whole dashboard" in your hands. :rolleyes:

...and after seeing the clutch pedal which is actually an e-brake in the AT Altima coupe I ran away from the Nissan section.

Given that the Murano and Altima share the same platform and drivetrain, do you expect Nissan to design and build a unique e-brake pedal for each car? What would be the point of that?

First of all the interiors are better than any American competitor and secondly if that's what causes you to think that they are "POS" then you really need to learn to have an open mind. And as for the faceplate its designed to do that--its a screwless design. Sheesh...

^^^ What he said.


M
 
The only issue that people might have with a G is that it is sporty first and soft comfy ride second. Though, I personally feel that it does both very well like Mercedes and Audi.
I haven't driven a current G35, but all the cars you mention actually do comfy ride first and sporty second. That's exactly why I passed up a 1st-gen G35 with about 40 more horsepower to pick what I'm driving today.

And ///M, DO NOT WANT an FX. Those things are just fugly with a capital F.
 
And ///M, DO NOT WANT an FX. Those things are just fugly with a capital F.

I think his views on automotive styling differ from yours, consider that he's got Murano, and you previously labeled one an "angry iron" or something similar. :D
 
I've driven several xDrive BMWs, including the 328xi sedan, 330xi sedan, X3 and new X5. Just not the wagon. I don't see a problem with their AWD system. It's not the best system out there, but neither is it 'rubbish'.

Well their awd system turned the 3er in the comparos I read from being a class leader, into bringin up the rear.
 
And ///M, DO NOT WANT an FX. Those things are just fugly with a capital F.

Awww, they're not that bad. All I remember is that I was disappointed with the space in the back-seat, but was otherwise impressed with the performance (we had a FX45 out for a drive one afternoon).

...What about that new EX35 thingamajig? I have no idea if its "good" or not, haven't heard much about it altogether...

2008-infiniti-ex35-600001.jpg
 
From what I've seen about the EX, it looks ugly. I'm basing that entirely off the above pic, probably because that was the first time I have even heard of it:lol:.
 
:D You guys are so serious. But, yeah, the clutch-- I mean e-brake on the altima is unacceptable.

And, yeah, I just touched the plastic cover piece on the Murano and it fell right off. I snapped it back on, but you think they would lock that stuff in place.

You guys can't make me like it, though. I will knock it as I please. :)
 
I quite like the FX (oh gawd, Duke is going to murder me :nervous:), but the EX looks terrible. The side profile is particularly bad &#8211; the nose looks about forty feet too long. The interior is brilliant though (literally and figuratively).

1233723722_3cd4469488.jpg
 
I haven't driven a current G35, but all the cars you mention actually do comfy ride first and sporty second. That's exactly why I passed up a 1st-gen G35 with about 40 more horsepower to pick what I'm driving today.

Ummm, I'll politely disagree with you here...in terms of the G.

And ///M, DO NOT WANT an FX. Those things are just fugly with a capital F.

Your personal opinion. Seems he isn't so worried about the way it looks. And for the record, I find the FX more attractive than the Murano.

Awww, they're not that bad. All I remember is that I was disappointed with the space in the back-seat, but was otherwise impressed with the performance (we had a FX45 out for a drive one afternoon).

Honestly, I'd get the FX35 with the larger wheels. The noise to me is what does it for me. Sounding like a 350Z/G35 coupe makes my pants happy. ;)

...What about that new EX35 thingamajig? I have no idea if its "good" or not, haven't heard much about it altogether...

2008-infiniti-ex35-600001.jpg

I must say, I quite like it. Is that larger than the FX? If it is larger and is as good on the road as the FX I'll be a huge fan. The main thing about the FX's drive that I like is the fact that you quickly forget that you are driving a SUV. Honestly, it to me feels like I'm driving a sports car.
 
Back