I hope this makes a little sense,
Ok so something rather unexpected happened this morning.
I was woken by the postman again and had to get up to take a package, it could have been one of four things, 3 of which would still take at least another week to arrive. I was fairly certain it was the Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f1.7 i'd been waiting for. Soon i was to discover this was not the case!
I opened it up to find this:
Not too untoward, i bought the zeiss without a box, so perhaps the seller only had this one handy....again, wrong!
There was actually a BNIB EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM in there!
For those of you that dont know this lens costs upwards of £300, i hadn't bought it, i had not paid for it, i dont know who sent it, and i cant return it (not enough info on return address). I guess all i can do is hang onto it until someone realises thier mistake. But damn! some mistake huh?
BTW, these shots were taken with my 17-85mm IS USM and Speedlite 430EX
Oh, go to hell dude. I sooo want one of those (I need it really, I have a really bad pulse) and I've been trying to buy one for a long time, but money just slips off my hands. I dont know if that or a car rig.
awesome lens, would you sell it to me if the mistake doesn't fix itself? of course, if it works, what if it's broken? you could find out, but if it does, IM INTERESTED!!!
Thanks, I just used three sheets of A3 paper, in Photoshop I simply dodge all the texture out so the background is nice and even. I only used natural light for this and a polariser, though ideally I'd have a black background with an external flash that would be reflected around the car.
Awesome, did you curve the paper so then there were not straight edges to edit out? I never thought of dodging the texture out, a pretty smart idea really. 👍
However, you know when you see those photo studio shoots with a plain white backround in magazines and stuff, basically the general way they do this is they go around the object with pathes and then copy and paste it into a new layer then fill the backround layer with white, black and sometimes even a gradient. You must excuse me if it seems like I'm acting like a a know it all, I'm not I'm just passing on some of knowledge I picked up at my work experience during the past week.
The way you have done it is effective and works which is the most important thing, and you've done it with a awesome camera. Unlike mine...
The paper did curve, it also helped to even out the lighting slightly. I'll try that cut+paste method you mentioned, it'll save me from buying different BGs... And my camera isn't THAT awesome (lusts after D300).
Heh, yeah i got real lucky, it works perfectly, pretty much BNIB. Im still waiting for someone to come forward and say something, knowing my luck it'll happen, but if not in the next 4 days i'll be keeping it.
Sorry Cano, i was actually trying to save up £100 for the 75-300 IS USM, but this is even better, im almost temped to sell it so i can afford a sigma 10-20mm, wanted one of those for some time now too.
I'll wait until at least after i've been to santa pod in july (25th-27th), im pretty sure i'll use it there, then maybe if im not using it as much as i'd thought i would i'll let you know, dont worry if i am gonna sell it you'll be the first to know about it.
Just out of curiosity, how much would you be willing to part for it, considering its a BIN jobbie of £300 GBP on ebay (6,122.60 MXN apparently)?
I like this one better but it needs bokeh. srsly.
Wow, some nice shots there.
Is the flaring on the second-to-last one from PS, or did it capture like that?