I don't know if you're refering to my post (but really?) or yours (but why?).^Please, please slap a spoiler warning on that...
Following @UkMickey comment, NSFW, maybe. I don't think so
In the original movie maybe, but here it's a low res pixel soup.It has a clear image of Sharon Stone's ooh-la-la. Especially if you pause it at just the right moment.
OKMikey!I was kind of objecting to the ick factor of a Bernie based Basic Instinct... j/k, but I really don't think they allow money shots under the AUP. And it's "Mikey", please.
I don't think I'd be able to get away with writing **** in a very small font and this is the equivalent. The AUP is to protect this public facing site from the legal consequences of posting non family-friendly content without a warning. Or it's big tech censorship, take your pick. (j/k again). They come down hard on this sort of thing.In the original movie maybe, but here it's a low res pixel soup.
You're getting away with writing "****" in a normal-sized font, so I don't see what the big deal is.I don't think I'd be able to get away with writing **** in a very small font and this is the equivalent. The AUP is to protect this public facing site from the legal consequences of posting non family-friendly content without a warning. Or it's big tech censorship, take your pick. (j/k again). They come down hard on this sort of thing.
View attachment 986298
Via Getty feels the Bern.
**** off.You're getting away with writing "****" in a normal-sized font, so I don't see what the big deal is.
That pic is just a slight caricature:
Chuck no
If convicted he should face some stiff penalties.Chuck no