Why remove?
Why remove?
It is now a very useful identifier for people who are exceptually good in a leading position.
I mainly know her from the Jimmy Carr show 8 Out Of 10 Cats.For readers outside the UK, Susie is famous for hosting the Dictionary Corner segments on a popular word game-based TV show over here.
View attachment 1403549
Connie vermin are groomers.I know this is going to make me sound incredibly old, but what the hell is up with Gen Z? They're becoming Boomers with the amount of crap they're spitting out. I've seen so many Gen Z posts from the past few days about kids in high school saying, "your body, my choice."
They go on social media and listen to people like Andrew Tate.I know this is going to make me sound incredibly old, but what the hell is up with Gen Z? They're becoming Boomers with the amount of crap they're spitting out. I've seen so many Gen Z posts from the past few days about kids in high school saying, "your body, my choice."
Vox and Atlantic have good pieces on it:I know this is going to make me sound incredibly old, but what the hell is up with Gen Z? They're becoming Boomers with the amount of crap they're spitting out. I've seen so many Gen Z posts from the past few days about kids in high school saying, "your body, my choice."
Reprehensible, but I'm not sure this is the thread for it.FEMA: Worker fired after directing workers to avoid helping hurricane survivors who supported Trump
The leader of the Federal Emergency Management Agency says a worker has been fired after she directed workers helping hurricane survivors to avoid homes with yard signs supporting President-elect Donald Trump.apnews.com
But...she was just fulfilling the will of the people. Less government and socialism, right?
I'm soo happy that I was born in 2000, because it means that I can see through the bs.I know this is going to make me sound incredibly old, but what the hell is up with Gen Z? They're becoming Boomers with the amount of crap they're spitting out. I've seen so many Gen Z posts from the past few days about kids in high school saying, "your body, my choice."
Two things that have absolutely nothing to do with each other.I'm soo happy that I was born in 2000, because it means that I can see through the bs.
Agreed. Contrary to "popular" belief, the year 2000 is not an asymptote.Two things that have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
You see if I said this to you you'd ban me. In case you weren't aware of the context, my birth year of 2000 means that I'm a Gen Zedder but no-one will say that I am because I'm not quite young enough. For this reason, I do not watch or listen to people like Andrew Tate so I'm not a misogynist by any means. If I was younger and more impressionable, I would likely not be able to see that toxic masculinity for what it is and just accept it as "normal". The kids that are being soo disrespectful these days were born into the age of social media and internet connectivity, whilst I was not. Whether you like to believe it or not, my ability to see through the misogynistic "bs" is most definitely related to my birth date.The sheer number of ill-considered takes posted and then walked back two posts later after very mild scrutiny indicates that seeing "through the bs" is not part of the inborn skillset.
Unlikely - but then again it would be untrue, as I generally consider my views before I post them and then don't walk them back almost immediately after even the lightest of questioning. Whereas you have a habit of doing the opposite.You see if I said this to you you'd ban me.
2000 is definitely in the Gen Y/Z crossover blur, so... this is a weird thing to say.In case you weren't aware of the context, my birth year of 2000 means that I'm a Gen Zedder but no-one will say that I am because I'm not quite young enough.
You think that being born in 2000 means you don't watch/listen to Andrew Tate?!For this reason, I do not watch or listen to people like Andrew Tate so I'm not a misogynist by any means.
Wait... now he has no fans older than 24 either? That probably comes as news to him, and to everyone else too - and you'd have a hard time explaining this survey:If I was younger and more impressionable, I would likely not be able to see that toxic masculinity for what it is and just accept it as "normal".
The only way this can possibly be true is if everyone born in 2000 (or now also older somehow) also does this. And as we know that they don't, it isn't.Whether you like to believe it or not, my ability to see through the misogynistic "bs" is most definitely related to my birth date.
Unlikely - but then again it would be untrue, as I generally consider my views before I post them and then don't walk them back almost immediately after even the lightest of questioning. Whereas you have a habit of doing the opposite.
2000 is definitely in the Gen Y/Z crossover blur, so... this is a weird thing to say.
You think that being born in 2000 means you don't watch/listen to Andrew Tate?!
Do you think he has no 23-24 year old viewers at all?
Wait... now he has no fans older than 24 either? That probably comes as news to him, and to everyone else too - and you'd have a hard time explaining this survey:
View attachment 1404272
The only way this can possibly be true is if everyone born in 2000 (or now also older somehow) also does this. And as we know that they don't, it isn't.
And here is 26-year old Nick Fuentes amplifying the "bs":
Tate himself is 37...
I'm supposed to apologise for what now?So instead of apologising, you dig your heals in. Nice.
That things were better before mass immigration, racial and gendered guilt activism and bankers screwed the economy.
And before that there was the dumb thing in the Trump shooting thread, and before that there was the dumb thing in this thread about trans athletes...Oh so immigration is not the root cause. It’s just one factor in a multi-faceted issue.
And this is a pattern of behaviour: ill-considered takes posted and then walked back two posts later after very mild scrutiny. Although sometimes it's as many as five posts.Guess it was all a lie then. To be honest I'm too lazy to look into it so thank goodness you do. Helps me out a lot.
Why is that an issue? Am I not allowed to change my opinion? Do you want me to double down on my bad takes?I'm supposed to apologise for what now?
We don't even need to go back that far to an example where you made an ill-considered, bad take about immigration which fell apart under the lightest scrutiny possible and you walked it back.
You're suggesting that I can't see through the bs of misogyny and I must therefore be stupid.And before that there was the dumb thing in the Trump shooting thread, and before that there was the dumb thing in this thread about trans athletes...
And this is a pattern of behaviour: ill-considered takes posted and then walked back two posts later after very mild scrutiny. Although sometimes it's as many as five posts.
It seems like you get taken in by "bs" and only realise it's "bs" when someone else checks for you and presents data. A lot.
Why do I need to apologise for that?