Danoff
Premium
- 34,039
- Mile High City
So the saying goes that NASA spent millions developing a pen that could write in space without needing gravity to draw the ink down. The Russians just used a pencil. Ignoring the fact that Russia did eventually buy space pens from NASA because of the dangers of broken pencil tips floating around, and also ignoring the fact that NASA designed the space pen as a replacement for the pencil - which is what they were previously using...
...ignoring all of that, Russia tried to use a pencil again. They just launched a sample-return mission to Phobos called Phobos-Grunt. The price tag for this? $163 million. NASA requires several times that to ORBIT Mars, let alone land on Phobos and return a sample. The price tag for this mission at NASA would be over a $1 billion easy... maybe 2.
So how's it going? They haven't left Earth orbit yet because their upper stage failed to ignite.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15631472
I have very mixed feelings about this. From the point of science, I'd love to see a Phobos sample-return mission succeed. I'm all for exploration of the solar system, and a Phobos sample-return is exciting to say the least. I also know for sure that it can't be done reliably for that kind of price tag, and I don't want NASA to get pressured to dangerously cut mission costs and start failing just because of a lucky shot.
I'm still pulling for Phobos-Grunt. But I have to say that I'm somewhat relieved that they're struggling, because I don't want to see the US space agency chase the Russians down this road. With the US budget being a big ticket item on everyone's mind, I could see that happening.
...ignoring all of that, Russia tried to use a pencil again. They just launched a sample-return mission to Phobos called Phobos-Grunt. The price tag for this? $163 million. NASA requires several times that to ORBIT Mars, let alone land on Phobos and return a sample. The price tag for this mission at NASA would be over a $1 billion easy... maybe 2.
So how's it going? They haven't left Earth orbit yet because their upper stage failed to ignite.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15631472
I have very mixed feelings about this. From the point of science, I'd love to see a Phobos sample-return mission succeed. I'm all for exploration of the solar system, and a Phobos sample-return is exciting to say the least. I also know for sure that it can't be done reliably for that kind of price tag, and I don't want NASA to get pressured to dangerously cut mission costs and start failing just because of a lucky shot.
I'm still pulling for Phobos-Grunt. But I have to say that I'm somewhat relieved that they're struggling, because I don't want to see the US space agency chase the Russians down this road. With the US budget being a big ticket item on everyone's mind, I could see that happening.
Last edited: