the first 2 are completely insignificant compared to say wars or bombings, the 3rd hasn't happened yet and the 4th isn't a world event.
But hey, your call.
I'd mention 9/11/01 but it's ubiquitous. On my way to work early that morning I glanced up into the night sky and saw the crescent moon "holding water" with a star just opposite. It was the perfect Islamic symbol and I shuddered involuntarily as I had the momentary intuition that something major was afoot. Sure enough, 40 minutes later the dirty deed was done.
I'd mention 9/11/01 but it's ubiquitous. On my way to work early that morning I glanced up into the night sky and saw the crescent moon "holding water" with a star just opposite. It was the perfect Islamic symbol and I shuddered involuntarily as I had the momentary intuition that something major was afoot. Sure enough, 40 minutes later the dirty deed was done.
You mean you were an Islamophobe before it was trendy? Cool!
As of Q2 2009 21.17 millions units sold. So there's our base reference.The first one has affected millions more people than many wars have.
Except it's blatant that September 11th is seen by many as the beginning of the war on terror. The war in Iraq, the war in afghanistan, the problems in Pakistan, the atrocities in Bali and London.The second one has affected *possibly* thousands more than many wars have in their lifetimes—how much has the Rwandan Genocide, Sierra Leone civil war/ethnic cleansing, Serbo-Croat war, Gulf War or any of those impacted your life? I've met a lot of people, but neither one has affected me. Online dating, on the other hand, is much more relevant to people. Similarly, 9/11 "only" affected 3000 people in America- a country with 300 million people. Yet, the Air India bombing "only" affected 327 people in Canada- a country with ~30 million people. So the ratio of destruction>local environment is the same, yet 9/11's singular mamoth presence was enough to hijack news agencies and attention all over the world. What is more tragic, perhaps, is the fact that an inquiry was launched into 9/11 within the first 5 years, wheras the Air India bombing brewed for 10 and took 20 to be investigated.
So it's all relative.
Why? There's cures for thousands of known diseases that continue to kill thousands a day, millions a year.The third hasn't happened yet, but I'm currently filled with the excitement of it much more than anything else. To know it's on the cusp of being solved is very inspiring news.
Except it's blatant that September 11th is seen by many as the beginning of the war on terror. The war in Iraq, the war in afghanistan, the problems in Pakistan, the atrocities in Bali and London.
To say that September 11th only affected 3000 people, is to say that the assasination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand only affected one man.
While I'm aware of it, it's not well known across the pond.That and the Patriot Act and all that
How many modern wars can you name that involved countries with populations combined of fewer than that?
Wow. Comparing the indirect affects of the iphone and war. Wow.As I said, many warsnot all wars. And as an iPhone directly affects its' user, I think it's fair to compare with the victims of war directly affected as well.
Wow. Comparing the indirect affects of the iphone and war. Wow.
Wow. Comparing the indirect affects of the iphone and war. Wow.
I agree with Public's Twin on most things, but i don't agree this time. To say cellphones in general would have been valid, but not a specific model.
You're all missing the point anyway, but OK.
Literalize the **** out of it? So because you made a very bold statement and I chose to question it, in the opinions forum, there's a problem?Yeah, well next time you make a glib comment, remind me to literalize the **** out of it so I can ruin your example, too.
Literalize the **** out of it? So because you made a very bold statement and I chose to question it, in the opinions forum, there's a problem?
So everyone misses the point about what you're trying to say, but you're okay with that. Okay, I think I get that point.No, and you're missing the point again. Just because it's the Opinions forum and open to debatedoesn't mean I have to endlessly explain and justify everything I espouse in here, whether it's my own opinion or not. And since it's just not that imperative to me for you to understand, I'm ending this conversation here.
So everyone misses the point about what you're trying to say, but you're okay with that. Okay, I think I get that point.