By the slimmest of margins according to Car & Driver, though, because they found the LFA more exciting to drive; as I said, on its own, it's a fantastic car to drive. General use & performance were still key points for the Ferrari, which was my point, because in the market, the LFA was a tough sale against competitors. And it didn't help that Lexus was scrutinized when they originally wanted owners to lease the vehicles; if you purchased one, you'd get the title a couple years later.
I have not seen the GTO comparison, but it sounds absurd. The GTO is a completely different kind of animal that relies on driver aids to enjoy, aids that seem to undoubtedly, interfere in a pure driving experience. The other side of that sword is that you can't enjoy the car in its unassisted madness because it requires someone who knows exactly what they're doing to control a 660Hp car that was running to 60 in 3 seconds. Certain supercars are only now just touching on that.
I can see why the LFA would win in that comparison; there's none of that fuss.