Silver Arrows
(Banned)
- 4,715
- Brandon, MB
- Silver-Arrows21
Its hilarious how many of you resort to pathetic childish insults.
Not even a post up...
jealousy bring out the lowest of the low class.
So tell me, who's the one going down to the level of pathetic, childish insults? Over a goddamn car that they haven't even driven, nevertheless an actual automotive journo? All because it doesn't fit the notions that you've set for the nameplate that haven't been true in nearly two decades? Said notions being fluid and ever changing based on the generation?
all you've done since coming into this thread is antagonize people, try to show yourself off as some dude who knows more then anyone else. You've been promptly smacked down by luxury auto salesmen, *actual* automotive journos, and people who know a hell of a lot more then you. All because you wanted to defend the honor of a car that you bought second hand, and seem to think is the definitive answer to what a Supra is. Forgetting the five or so generations that came before it.
So who's the childish one here? Is it the guy who decided to make a burner account so that he could hopefully continue the circlejerk that have been present in A80 forums since the A90 had been announced in full as a collaborative project between BMW and Toyota? You've been told countless times why Toyota has done what it has done.You, meanwhile, have been rambling and insisting that the A80 could beat all challengers within the cars of it's time frame (it doesn't) and that the A90 is this 90 pound weakling of a car performance wise compared to the competition (It isn't, even when you move the goal posts to try and add high level trims and models to the mix to make the A90 seem worse)
Then again, if you did get your wish and Toyota made another car that was like the Mk.IV, you'd find something else to bitch about it anyway, because what is consistent with you, and other A80 fans is that the goalposts will always be moved.