For sure. A bit cookie cutter on the hood, but the styling and color is sweet.Yeah agreed. Though they could have made the hood more inspired by the old 3000GT instead of 100% copy, maybe make it more streamline with the body shape of the car. But overall it's great.
The irony of this post, though. I approve.Finally saw one in person. Look a lot better than in pictures I admit. I like it.
Which is a bit funny since A70 looked nothing like the A80, yet they are trying so hard to appeas the A80 fans.Even if it was 100% Toyota designed and built I'd still find all this "it's the A80's successor, honest" marketing insecure and embarrassing
The MkIV Supra wing didn't even look good on the MkIV Supra.
The MkIV Supra wing didn't even look good on the MkIV Supra.
The engine has been the same well before the Supra was made though.Again, Supra is the only model, in Super GT form, that is true to the road car with a 4-cylinder turbo engine. Maybe Honda and Nissan should look into it.
Honda and Nissan could have made 4-cylinder road car variants before the A90 as well. Add DTM to my point, Mercedes have a 4-cylinder for the C-Class. So, only two out of the six makes in Class 1, show relevance to what the manufacturers sell.The engine has been the same well before the Supra was made though.
Add DTM to my point, Mercedes have a 4-cylinder for the C-Class. So, only two out of the six makes in Class 1, show relevance to what the manufacturers sell.
Edit: Make that three. The BMW "430"i, is a 2L 4. Go figure.
Except Mercedes bottled development of a Turbo 4 for DTM and quit the series in 2018. However, Audi's A5 A35 TFSI is a turbo 4, while Aston Martin clearly don't offer a 4 cylinder in anything.
.. not that it matters. The point of silhouette racing with spec engines isn't road relevance.
Ah, yes. Audi as well.Road Relevence is an over rated concept, the cars are basically Open Wheeled race cars with a body on them.
Most people are happy that they atleast try to resemble a car they know.
Well, people are still complaining about the NSX not being naturally aspirated, having a manual 'box, or looking identical to the old one, so I don't think that really escaped. The R35's been around for so long now I can't actually remember what people thought of it at launch. There were the usual "drives like a Playstation" comments from people who'd only ever actually driven on Playstations but I think what it delivered was so far above its predecessor that it generally had a decent reception from the internet.
I think the R35 has aged incredibly well, possibly because it was so ahead of its time at launch. And it drives brilliantly. The NSX is much better than the internet gives it credit for. I'm less keen on the Supra, but then as most people should know by now, the A80 hardly had glowing reviews back in its day, so actually the A90 is probably as good as a Supra's ever been.
You have quite the revisionist history. Ferrari's game in the early 90's was weak to the point Honda was their turn around. And the 911 Turbo was a much different animal.Your hilarious, can't remember r35 reviews but can Mkiv ones from the early 90s. Glowing reviews is exactly what it had, to the point they compared it to Ferraris and Turbo 911s lol. Compared to its tradition competition and relative performance to it, A90 is as weak as a Supra ever been.
Supra/911 Turbo from C/DSupra: Zero to 60 mph: 4.6 sec
911 Turbo: Zero to 60 mph: 4.0 sec
Supra: Zero to 100 mph: 11.1 sec
911 Turbo: Zero to 100 mph: 9.2 sec
Supra: 5–60 mph: 5.9 sec
911 Turbo: 5-60 mph: 5.2 sec
Supra: Standing ¼-mile: 13.1 sec @ 109 mph
911 Turbo: Standing ¼-mile: 12.4 sec @ 114 mph
Car and Drive 911 Turbo conclusionAnd sweet crescendos these are. Launch it hard (5500 revs seems to suit the weight distribution, huge rear tires, and sturdy drivetrain) and 4.0 seconds later you're midway through the second banshee chorus, hurtling along at 60 mph.
That leaves every other U.S.-legal production car we've tested sucking the Porsche's catalyzed wake.
You have quite the revisionist history. Ferrari's game in the early 90's was weak to the point Honda was their turn around. And the 911 Turbo was a much different animal.
I never said it bested the 911, maybe actually read what was said. But it was so well reviewed that they put it up against cars from Porsche and Ferrari.
Car and Driver 1993This is quick.
Quicker than an Acura NSX, a Dodge Stealth R/T Turbo, and a Porsche 928GT—a trio of cars that tackle 60 mph in 5.2 seconds. It's quicker, in fact, than stellar strip artists like the Mazda RX-7, the Corvette LT1, and the Nissan 300ZX Turbo, all three of which perform the same trick in five flat.
Road & Track 1993The handling, while breathtaking at times with micrometer-precise steering, doesn't have quite the feedback I relish in cars like Porsche's 968.
Ferraris game that lead to a turbocharged pick up truck comparison?Ferraris game was fine till Japan leap frogged it.
Oh Christ, you again.Your hilarious, can't remember r35 reviews but can Mkiv ones from the early 90s. Glowing reviews is exactly what it had, to the point they compared it to Ferraris and Turbo 911s lol. Compared to its tradition competition and relative performance to it, A90 is as weak as a Supra ever been.