- 15,460
- Orange County, NY
- GTP_GT916
- Nii916
Wait....are those Laguna Seca's ads in the top right corner?
Wait....are those Laguna Seca's ads in the top right corner?
Wait....are those Laguna Seca's ads in the top right corner?
I love twin Motegi in forza, would be cool to get it in GT5, to told the truth, any track would be nice as long as it's not an oval.
RX-7_FD3SI love twin Motegi in forza, would be cool to get it in GT5, to told the truth, any track would be nice as long as it's not an oval.
There's an oval layout to Motegi, too
Spa and Route X were the only DLC tracks that have come out so far.This^^
The only DLC track i have enjoyed is spa, the others while nice to have didn't exactly keep me coming back to them as i just didn't find them enjoyable especially route X.
w-g-eSpa and Route X were the only DLC tracks that have come out so far.
Ah yes, I guess you could say it's a track.The 4 layouts of Kart Space. It came with Spa.
My prediction is that we'll get a large update to the game at the end of the Academy that will enable us to transfer over the cars we won in the GT Academy mini-game and maybe bring along with it some further enhancements and improvements to GT5.
Along with that update, I predict that we'll get some DLC, which will include Twin Ring Motegi and all of its variations and maybe some new vehicles. I don't think that we'll get the circuit for free just because it was in the Academy mini-game; I think it'll be part of a separate pack.
SPA is great with high HP cars, more mid-low HP car tracks are need in the game.
If in fact the track is to be used on the GT Academy there's no reason why we shouldn't get it for GT5. All the work is done and everything is adapted to work on the GT5 platform. So the track's development is already paid for by Nissan, why should we pay for it again? At the end of the day this whole GT Academy thing is nothing more than a publicity stunt and adverticement, so why should we pay for that?
JavIf in fact the track is to be used on the GT Academy there's no reason why we shouldn't get it for GT5. All the work is done and everything is adapted to work on the GT5 platform. So the track's development is already paid for by Nissan, why should we pay for it again? At the end of the day this whole GT Academy thing is nothing more than a publicity stunt and adverticement, so why should we pay for that?
SSRX is in gtacadamy, yet we still have to pay to use it in gt5. We will have to pay for anything new IMO, Except the cars.
I don't believe its from GT5.
Look at the edge of the track in the OP picture. It's too "Jagged" and doesn't have enough Polygons? either way, what I'm trying to say is the graphics aren't smooth enough to be GT5.
Where are the GT logos? I think this is probably from GT4 or something with similar graphics, NOT GT5.
I wish it is from GT5 but I'm not convinced.
I'm not a pessimist or anything but; it's always good to not have our hopes up about future DLC from PD
I don't believe its from GT5.
Look at the edge of the track in the OP picture. It's too "Jagged" and doesn't have enough Polygons? either way, what I'm trying to say is the graphics aren't smooth enough to be GT5.
All tracks in GT5 are like that actually. In fact most things circular in GT5 you will notice a lot of straight lines like that since it requires a lot of 'juice' from the PS3 to produce a really smooth circular line.