- 1,399
- Jakarta
Nice visualization, I can see what you're saying. It's built in 1969 though, long before the Miata. Just saying, many probably noticed that already
Oh yes.
Do you have any information on this? Since those tail lights are definitely not from '69, same goes for those wheels. The car is much too modernly styled to be anything that Pininfarina created.
EDIT: It looks like it might even be a kit based off of the Fiat Dino.
They are very upright and volvo ish. I like them but the base Lancer isn't that great of a car. A EVO version would be awesome.
Volkswagen Thing
I need to have a word with you.
I always had a soft spot for the old Mazda MX-6. They're not even that ugly, but they're ALWAYS dirty...
I always liked them until I discovered the joys of Rear-Wheel Drive. Maybe we need a subthread, for pretty but unappealing cars?
Yeah, they don't really look bad. Just kinda bland, especially when compared to their competition. Same with it's performance. *yawn*Those final gen Cougars are good looking IMHO shame they never got the SVT contour drivetrain.
Yes and they could've done a hell of a better job with it.Do you have any idea why the "FORD" on the grill is so significant? You have a lot of history to learn young man.
I don't care about history if it looks ugly.
Edit: So others don't have to spend 20 seconds googling "ford raptor front"
Ford changed to the blue oval in 1982 after 80 years of it saying "FORD" in big letters across the tailgate and smaller ones on the hood. I've seen many Raptors in person and never once have I thought it "blended into the rest of the grill". The letters stick out like a sore thumb.I think a Ford would be more recognizable if it had a blue oval; the big letters tend to blend in to the grille, and because they are so wide, you almost have to squint to read them. Then you realize, "Oh, it says FORD."
Tomorrow I think I will photoshop a Raptor and give it a normal-looking grille to see it it will look better.
Love it.