Unraced F1 cars

I did do a search, but I could not find any thread on this subject at all. So since unraced F1 cars are usually a very intresting subject, I thought lets make a thread on them...

Here is a video of the Dome F1 that was due to race in 1997...

Course: Suzuka Full Course
Driver: Naoki Hattori

Does anyone know the full story on why this car never raced, because I sure dont! :)
 
I don't, but I will shortly...

EDIT: It's a pity, but the deal between Dome and Mugen, the engine supplier, fell out in some way, and proper sponsorship never materialized, thus they had to shelve the project. Other than that, the Dome F1 racing program was ready to go. Sad, as Dome was a very successful company in other fields of racing, including F3, F2, Le Mans, and ALMS.

It was such a nice-sounding car, too, like an angry canned hornet, or a TVR recorded by a bad camera, as opposed to the falsetto whining of today's F1 racers...

Mostly, though, the reason for unraced F1 cars nowadays are lack of sponsorship or cars built under defunct rules, or cars that break the rules. Sad, isn't it?

Anyways, how about that 1952 BRM 4.5L GP racer?
 
Thanks. However, dont you think this car would have had trouble qualifying, I mean, just look at my time comparison below...

1) J.Villenueve (Williams Renault FW19): 1'36''071
2) N.Hattori (Dome F1 Mugen-Honda): 1'46''028

The first time was the pole lap set by Villenueve at Suzuka 1997 and the second was Hattori's testing lap. The Dome F1 was exactly 0'09'957 seconds slower than Villenueve.
 
Thanks. However, dont you think this car would have had trouble qualifying, I mean, just look at my time comparison below...

1) J.Villenueve (Williams Renault FW19): 1'36''071
2) N.Hattori (Dome F1 Mugen-Honda): 1'46''028

The first time was the pole lap set by Villenueve at Suzuka 1997 and the second was Hattori's testing lap. The Dome F1 was exactly 0'09'957 seconds slower than Villenueve.

Yeh, I noticed that the Dome's top speed seemed limited (to 291km/h, and engine revs were strained before 130R), but then again, Dome was not properly funded, and Naoki Hattori was not the greatest driver.
 
I also found a photo as well on google...
ma-suz96-test.jpg

I have just noticed something. In the video it looks like the car is using Bridgestones, however in this picture it is using Goodyears, weird huh!

Oh yeah, and does anyone rember this unraced F1 car also from 1997!
5156

It's the Mastercard Lola-Ford T97/30. I know exactly why this one did'nt race though. The Lola team wanted to go live in 1998, but Mastercard insisted (litrerly) that they raced in 1997. This did not leave them enough time to get the car developed up to the stage of being a competitive racer. After failing to qualify at Aussy 1997, and then not racing either, Mastercard pulled the plug at Brazil, the very next race. It was so slow infact, it was more then 10 seconds slower of the pace setting Williams Renault of the time!
 
I also found a photo as well on google...
ma-suz96-test.jpg

I have just noticed something. In the video it looks like the car is using Bridgestones, however in this picture it is using Goodyears, weird huh!

Oh yeah, and does anyone rember this unraced F1 car also from 1997!
5156

It's the Mastercard Lola-Ford T97/30. I know exactly why this one did'nt race though. The Lola team wanted to go live in 1998, but Mastercard insisted (litrerly) that they raced in 1997. This did not leave them enough time to get the car developed up to the stage of being a competitive racer. After failing to qualify at Aussy 1997, and then not racing either, Mastercard pulled the plug at Brazil, the very next race. It was so slow infact, it was more then 10 seconds slower of the pace setting Williams Renault of the time!

The car (the Lola T-97) did not have ideal aerodynamics: that is, the wings produced too much drag and not enough downforce. This effectively killed the project.

Those Bridgestones are very strange on the Dome as well.

Blake, what is that car? The paint scheme looks like a McLaren Mercedes, and... Oh. I see.

Was it a prototype of the same car Mika Hakkinen drove?
 
I know this one. It is the McLaren MP4-18 from 2004. It's said it is never raced because it was to unrealible, however the MP4-19 is a rebadged MP4-18 according to Adrain Newey, so really it is not!
 
Oh. I should have noticed the side-pod design...

That car looks refreshingly familiar in its somber black scheme as opposed to the colourful cars of the present.
 
Quoting TheCracker's pictures posted from the Good, Bad & Ugly thread:
I think both Williams and March have tested 4WD cars in the past but both of these were 6 wheeled cars!

*snip*
Metar's Ferrari 312T6

The Williams six-wheeler was never raced, for a very simple reason: It didn't bring any benefits. The car was just as fast as the four-wheel cars, with the extra weight and complexity negating the advantages in aerodynamics gained from more smaller wheels.

(I removed the March, since it was actually raced in F1 for a while, and then continued to become a successful hillclimb car)

The Ferrari 312T6 was a six-wheeled version of the race-winning regular 312T2, Lauda's almost-championship-winning car in 1976. In the off-season between '75 and '76, Lauda tested the about-to-debut 312T2, an evolution of the '75 double-title winner, as well as the 312T6 special version. Again, this proved to be only averagely successful, but Lauda, unlike teammate Clay Regazzoni, liked the car, claiming that, while only as fast as the regular version, it has more potential, and it better to drive. He continued testing it during the '76 season, and was considering driving it in '77 - but the crash shelved that project.


Also never raced, the championship-winning Williams FW15C was mated to a CVT transmission. The car, oddly running full-revs into the tight hairpins of Silverstone, was shelved after the FIA banned CVTs, and added a minimum-gears clause.

The concept, however, was effective. Test-driver David Coulthard (the very same!) drove it about a second per lap quicker than average qualifying-times of those days. And that's with a regular engine: Engines, since the dawn of history, are designed in an attempt to produce as much torque and power over the widest possible range. CVT-optimized engines can have a powerband as narrow as 100rpms, and hence achieve far greater power in that speed. And lest we forget, that optimum power is mated all the time to the perfect gear-ratio for the conditions...

cvtwilliams003.jpg

cvtwilliams002.jpg

cvtwilliams004.jpg
 
The Honda RA099

Designed by Harvey Postlethwaite and built by Dallara, this was to be Honda's return to Formula One as a constuctor. The RA099 was only a test car built to be a test bed for the next years championship assault. Unfortunately Postlewaite died of a heart attack at one of the test sessions and the whole project was shelved. Honda latter bought the BAR outfit and returned that to F1 through that route.

 
The Honda RA099

Designed by Harvey Postlethwaite and built by Dallara, this was to be Honda's return to Formula One as a constuctor. The RA099 was only a test car built to be a test bed for the next years championship assault. Unfortunately Postlewaite died of a heart attack at one of the test sessions and the whole project was shelved. Honda latter bought the BAR outfit and returned that to F1 through that route.

Cool! What year did they origanilly plan to return? :)
 
According to my most reliable F1 source (Blake while we were chatting last night) they put the CDG in a wind tunnel and it didn't do a thing to improve wash. Blake went on to speculate that the rear diffuser is more responsible for turbulence than the rear wing.
 
Blake's speculation seems very true to me, seeing as the whole lower wing-structure is based around stalling the diffusor - IE, preventing as much air as possible from reaching it. As such, a lot of parts below the rear wing are just one big attempt to channel air upwards, creating a bigger low-pressure area around the diffusor - which equals more downforce from a more-effective diffusor, but also creating a larger zone of unclean air near the ground.

So matches what I know, as well.
 
I have it. Still haven’t read it, though, I really didn’t find the writing remotely compelling so I stopped reading pretty quickly.
 
Back