Why do you bring hackers to the table here, hacking is a security risk and need to be taken actions against, glitching is childplay goofing around, and none of my glitching friends want to do harm in any form. I can not take you serious on the matter, anyhow ......
I just went throught the wall on Nurburgring once again. Good job PD.
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
There are hackers in that game, but they are also present in
Gran Turismo 5. I also brought it to the table because the hacks also abused the glitches in the game to their advantage, which contributed it to being ruined. The same can happen to this game as well.
Like I said, the way he used it was not what I would consider a hateful/abusive manner. IMO, a better example of the word being used in a abusive manner would be "Anyone who thinks that this is a good idea is a [REDACTED]." The way he uses it does not read as that, but more as a frustration.
Toronado
Yes. "I agree with his points" does not mean that his points were carried in a way that was appropriate for GTP. And if calling people "ungrateful pricks" who should "pull [their] heads out of [their] arses" is terrible justification to you for reporting someone, I'd really like to know what you think is good justification. And I really hope your standard isn't "I agree with them, so they shouldn't be reported."
When did I ever say "I agree with his points"? The most I said was that I understood his viewpoint, which does not mean I entirely agree with it.
People frequently ask people/companies to pull their head out of their *****, this isn't something I consider an explicit rule violation. I've seen it quite a few times on this forum directed at Polyphony Digital and I haven't seen a person being reported for it.
As for good justifications, look at the example above this quote and similar examples (If you can't find it, I'll quote it, although it should be obvious). What can also be considered rule violations is turning a GT5/Polyphony Digital rant (Which I don't have a problem with) into a vicious attack on the fans who like the game calling their opinion automatically wrong and they themselves right. Trying to bring off-topic materials frequently and try to argue that as a supplement for why a game sucks to the point where it derails the thread is also what I consider a good justification for reporting someone.
Toronado
That's nice that you have the time to play the game in the poorly designed way that it was intended.
I don't play
Gran Turismo 5 every day for twelve hours a day. There are other things that I want to do and I am not just some lazy chum with no life whatsoever with no plans to improve himself. Yet I don't feel bored with GT5 because I play when I feel like it, not just to get something I want as quickly as possible. I'm suggesting to Nokkien that as long as he keeps playing the game, he will reach his goal of 4,000 cars. And considering that it's been almost six months and Nokkien has already gotten 1,160 cars, it's not unrealistic to expect that he can receive 4,000 cars within six years based on how much he has earned now. People play at different rates, it's only "poorly designed" if you force yourself on the TV screen to get a car you want.
Toronado
This example would only be relevant if GT5 had glitches that were remotely comparable.
It is comparable. Glitches has hurt both
The Conduit's and
Gran Turismo 5's online experiences when present. Both games also have hackers, the former ruined by them and the other, hacking is getting started and can spread online pretty fast.
Toronado
I hope this wasn't a serious argument.
I interpreted Betty_Swallocks's post as if he was mentioning anyone, so obviously, not everyone has finished up the game. He would also be wrong in saying that everyone in this forum has finished up the game already. I for one, am one of the person who have not finished up the game and still have about 30% of progress to go. I don't think everyone in this community has finished with the game.
Toronado
And how is that not a problem?
Because there are other things to do in the game for fun that you can make progress in. In this game, not only do you have A-Spec and license, but also B-Spec, Special Events, Seasonal events, and online. It may not have a huge A-Spec, but the other factors of the game more then makes up for it. Even so, I don't consider A-Spec to be poor because I actually enjoyed all the A-Spec events in the game. In GT3 and GT4, there were events that I didn't care that much for and just wanted to get out of the way.
Toronado
Huge double standard here.
It's not a double standard. marchi's post from my perspective falls under the AUP. The general tone I got from his post was that he was frustrated with how the community was acting despite the tsunami event and while I don't entirely agree with what he said, it is far from a hateful post. gt500all's general tone makes him sound immature and follows more of a "YOU SHOULDN'T COMPLAIN ABOUT GLITCHERS!" post. I'm not saying that glitchers are selfish people who constantly moan about the game, that is not what I am saying, but as people have the right to complain about people complaining about the glitch, people also have the right to complain about glitchers.
Toronado
It would help if he wasn't right. The self-righteousness held by some of the members on this forum is absolutely astounding.
There are a few people here with even less then a life then I do, but most of a "get a life" arguments is just trying to say that they're right in an argument and really doesn't indicate that it's that much of a problem. At least, that's what I've seen in the majority of "get a life" comments I've seen on the Internet.
Toronado
tl;dr, you are trying to make it look like you are playing Devil's Advocate without actually playing Devil's Advocate.
I do not argue for the sake of arguing, I argue because if I want to say something, I have every right to use it, and I don't respond to everything in a thread, just those I think that are worthy of being mentioned.