- 2,208
jpmontoyaZardoz, I think you didn't get the sarcasm in the post.
D'oh!
I guess I'm so pissed about this mess I'm not reading (or thinking) straight.
Sorry.
jpmontoyaZardoz, I think you didn't get the sarcasm in the post.
Good riddance, I say. If it's going to continue to be plagued by such beauocratic politics and absurd regulations, I don't think I'll be caring about it by 2007.usernamedLooks like no more F1 after 2007 ...
I think you haven't paid good attention to what just happened. You really think the FIA gives a damn what happened at the USGP? You really think they now feel the need to change their attitude?DevilGTxNo free GP in America.
People would die.
And if you think this will kill F1, you are badly mistaken.
This can only make it stronger.
Now they will change attitudes about rules interpretatuion.
DevilGTxNo free GP in America.
People would die.
And if you think this will kill F1, you are badly mistaken.
This can only make it stronger.
Now they will change attitudes about rules interpretatuion.
The teams will change strategic planning to allow for disasters like this from now on.
All about death...when the true intent is to maintain life, only at the edge.
BlakeSo I was completely wrong about this. 7 teams pulling a GP, I wouldn't have guessed it would get this severe but it did. F1 in America, especially at Indy, is all but over. The fallout of this will be incredible, I don't know how the FIA will handle this, how Michelin will react come next race, how the championship will turn out, what will happen to Michelin, what will happen to the 7 teams that pulled out of the race, whether there will be a US GP next year ... there is too much fallout, this is huge.
I put the blame squarly on Michelin, they should have bought a tyre that could finish the race. They screwed up and their mistake has caused this situation. There are things that could have been done to put on a show but it is not up to the FIA to fix Michelin's mistake. The fact is the FIA did what they had to do, they made efforts, however small, to allow the Michelin teams to race and acting under the advice of Michelin they chose, in the interest of safety, not to race.
Bridgestone bought a tyre that lasted the distance and was safe. They, nor the teams using Bridgestone tyres, should not be blamed for anything that happenned today.
Ferrari, as expected, blitzed the other Bridgestone teams in what essentially was a race distance test session with championship points the reward for finishing. Tiago outdrove his team mate and took a shallow podium, which will probably be his only one. The race was tottally pointless but the ramifications will be huge.
The championship is now wide open for Michael and Ferrari, but I can't help not taking this whole thing seriously. It is a race that should have had 20 competitors but only had 6, the points are meaningless now, and points from this race should be halved.
This is messed up ...
Blake
westwoodthis was a HUGE mistake. its going to have very severe consequences, people who payed for their entertainment were screwed the average american racing fan just switched his dial permanently back to nascar and efffectively lost any chance f1 had at getting an american market.
races are far too early for the average fan as its sunday and people arent getting up at 6 o clock to watch a race when they could be getting some seriously needed rest.
as for whos fault it lies in several place and no one is solely at fault. michelin brought a crap product and put everyone in a bad position but there is no reason the FIA couldnt of made some kind of compromise so that michelin runners could compete safely. eather it would of been giving bridgestone the top grid spots or simply allowing bridgestone to change tires aswell.
as for anyone who says the michelin guys could of run the race at reduced speed, thats a joke. what happens when that williams is chugging down the front stretch at 150mph and here comes a screaming ferrari at 200+, thats how people get killed.
and to blame ferrari for running the race is stupid, why would they pass up free points? if you were i nthat position youd of done the same thing. now they are tied for 2nd in the constructors champ and both of their drivers are within 5(?) points of 2nd overall.
no matter how you look at it its a very very sad day for the sport as absolutely nothing good has or will come from the events today.
Then you are really naive. You just HAVE to have an independent organisation like the FIA watching the sport and it's rules. If you end up with everything in constructors hands, you end up with some Marketing-Crap like the (current) DTM.SvenI'm all for it if the big teams want to break off and form their own league though. At least they'd know what they'd be doing.
VashTheStampedeIt really looks like there won't be a USGP next year, which is a real shame. There are some big fans of F1 here in the States, though not near as many as there should be. I am still trying to figure out why CRAPCAR is such a big deal. I could go out there and do the same damn thing they do all freakin' day. Though I would probably end up dieing from it because I would fall asleep at the wheel and hit a wall at way too fast of a speed. Outside of F1, the only thing I have to watch that is even fun to watch is ALMS and at times it can get kinda crummy. Though WRC is pretty good, the coverage isn't near as good as it could be.
Michelin really messed this one up though. Though Bridgestone would have had a slight advantage with already having some data on the track conditions. Still no excuse for Michelin big screwup. Though the FIA has really messed up with the stupid tire rule.
This race brought Ferrari right back into the championship picture.
Here is something sad to say. I am watching the CART race and it is much more enjoyable.At least there is real racing going on.
You say this will dial the American market back to CRAPCAR, well I am one of those that won't go back to that severely boring series. I see no entertainment value in the series. I mean I could sit there and go around in an oval all day too. I think I will start to watch ALMS much more seriously now though. I have always been a big fan of the series, just not been very good at watching the coverage. At least there are no real problems with the ALMS and the FIA is in no way involved at all.
Yes, the races are too early for the average American viewer. Even myself, a big fan of F1, have a hard time getting up at that time for races on Sunday. I mean if I stay up late on Saturday night, I can forget waking up for the race because there is no way I will be able to stay awake. I have to have the sleep or I just won't function properly.
And like you said, nothing good can come from this.
westwoodmy point was that the american market is already dialed into nascar, obviously not all of us but i would guess a very high % of american race fans are. f1 gets 1 race a year to turn people onto f1. with scott speed being their in a 3rd seat role this was a huge opportunity as it helped create more buzz. just so very sad to see it al lwasted.
Absolutely true.RooIt was Michelin's fault for not bringing suitable tyres. After that, there was never going to be a solution that all teams agreed with, and would satisfy the fans. So whilst a 6-car race was farcial, anything else would've been wrong in some way. Maybe the FIA will be able to think of some rule to prevent this happening again, although how I've no idea.
DevilGTxNo free GP in America.
People would die.
I think the only solution would be to remove the "one tire´s set per race" rule off the book.RooIt was Michelin's fault for not bringing suitable tyres. After that, there was never going to be a solution that all teams agreed with, and would satisfy the fans. So whilst a 6-car race was farcial, anything else would've been wrong in some way. Maybe the FIA will be able to think of some rule to prevent this happening again, although how I've no idea.
Charlie Whiting
Ross Brawns drinking buddy released a letter that he got from Michelin with some smart answers as to why they couldnt use different tyres on Sunday. But hes changed the rules for Bridgestone prior to a race so weve been here before. It's surprising nobodys questioned why Whiting changed the tyre rules at the beginning of the 2003 Brazilian GP.
Back in 2003 you were only allowed to take one wet tyre to races, so you had to make your mind up before the event. Bridgestone arrived at Interlagos with their legendary intermediate tyre that was quite good in wet and mixed conditions. Michelin had a full wet that could run in more rain.
When the heavens opened before the race, Whiting delayed the start because the Bridgestone runners wouldnt have been able to make it round safely. It was clearly Bridgestones fault for not bringing a full wet tyre, but as the argument has gone this weekend they knew the situation
After delaying the start the field was then sent round Interlagos behind the Safety Car until enough water was taken off the circuit. Had they released the field when it was suitable for the Michelins on full wets, then Fisichella would never have won the race in his Jordan and Kimi Raikkonen may well have got the win.
Nobody complained because it was a safety issue. Fast forward two years and Whiting is not prepared to compromise in another safety situation. This interpretation of the rules when it suits them makes F1 fans deeply suspicius - it's like there was an agenda here from the FIA.
Robin 2223They are talking to fans now on itv............they are all really pissed off! one guys come 9 hours to see this at a cost of $85 and one guys come from mexico! I should think so that they are angry!
SteveMcQueenI don't like most of the FIA's decisions recently, but today they sticked to the sports and that's fine with me.
Where should it end? At the next race somebody with Bridgestone tyres comes along and says "hey, we have really serious problems in Turn X - can't we put a chicane there or we have to retire...?".