Virgin Australia Supercars Championship - Archive

  • Thread starter DRIFT4EVA
  • 13,819 comments
  • 615,929 views

Holden or Ford

  • Holden

    Votes: 209 36.2%
  • Ford

    Votes: 175 30.3%
  • Ford and Holden

    Votes: 64 11.1%
  • Nismo

    Votes: 74 12.8%
  • Erebus

    Votes: 7 1.2%
  • Nismo and Erebus

    Votes: 6 1.0%
  • Volvo

    Votes: 43 7.4%

  • Total voters
    578
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, Tander actually qualified in the top ten for a change. Nice effort from Rick Kelly too, Nissan's look quick this weekend.
 
Am I the only one who hates the stadium super trucks? Sure, they look spectacular, but everything feels so fake - I mean, a mandatory competition caution to bunch the field up? And manipulating the drivetrain to lift the front wheel? It's not motorsport - it's reality TV, a heavily-controlled version of the sport fir entertainment purposes.
 
Am I the only one who hates the stadium super trucks? Sure, they look spectacular, but everything feels so fake - I mean, a mandatory competition caution to bunch the field up? And manipulating the drivetrain to lift the front wheel? It's not motorsport - it's reality TV, a heavily-controlled version of the sport fir entertainment purposes.
So it's the WWE of motorsports? :P
 
That Ute race... :scared:

Am I the only one who hates the stadium super trucks? Sure, they look spectacular, but everything feels so fake - I mean, a mandatory competition caution to bunch the field up? And manipulating the drivetrain to lift the front wheel? It's not motorsport - it's reality TV, a heavily-controlled version of the sport fir entertainment purposes.
Jeez... lighten up. They're a bit of fun, which is what they were designed to be.

I love how you say it feels so fake, but the very same thing can be said for F1 with DRS & FE with Fan Boost.
 
I disagree on DRS. While it might make passing too easy, without it, passing would be impossible. And when it works, it actually works really well; it gives the driver a chance to pass without guaranteeing it, so in the end, it comes down to the driver.
 
I disagree on DRS. While it might make passing too easy, without it, passing would be impossible. And when it works, it actually works really well; it gives the driver a chance to pass without guaranteeing it, so in the end, it comes down to the driver.
Highly disagree, when it gives you enough speed to flat pass the car before the braking zone its just a gimmick.
 
There was definitely a green light on the Safety Car. But, it changed to Orange just before he passed it. He isn't lying about the green light, but what he is lying about is that he didn't go against team orders.
 
There was definitely a green light on the Safety Car. But, it changed to Orange just before he passed it. He isn't lying about the green light, but what he is lying about is that he didn't go against team orders.

And ooohhh those team orders when Cheesburger is ahead of Whincup next year.
 
Whincup has changed his story about Bathurst again: in an interview with Mark Skaife, he says that he had no idea that the safety car had been deployed, and opted not to pit when he saw Lowndes go in, but had to make a judgement call when he saw the safety car. Extended footage does show that the safety car had green lights when he crested Mountain Straight, but they changed before he got to the safety car. He blames race control for making a mistake, but as Mark Skaife pointed out, he could have backed off and let the safety car back through and received the benefit of the doubt - a case of "I was doing 200km/h when the lights changed; I could not safely slow down in time" - and avoided a penalty, but he chose not to.

Whincup has also accused the commentators of deliberately misrepresenting events for the sake of telling a better story ... so if he does retire, I'd say he has a promising future as a member of the Liberal Party.
 
And ooohhh those team orders when Cheesburger is ahead of Whincup next year.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they arrange their gantries so that Whincup and Lowndes share one, while van Gisbergen and Davison share the other to avoid double-stacking Whincup and van Gisbergen. Sure, it sticks it to Lowndes and Davison, but Lowndes has only ever gotten priority when Whincup is down for the count, and Davison will be in a Tekno, so he and the team will have no say.
 
Whincup has also accused the commentators of deliberately misrepresenting events for the sake of telling a better story ... so if he does retire, I'd say he has a promising future as a member of the Liberal Party.
That's what really peeved me off. He's basically blamed all the industry experts (and Skaife, whom was interviewing him) for his "villain" tag despite it being himself that did it. Whincup has really made an even bigger fool of himself.

Also liked Skaife's comment back in the studio about how he and Lowndes have lost Bathurst's having to double stack behind Whincup. Really rubs the salt into the wounds.

Everyone needs to get over Bathurst. He ignored team orders and bought of all this crap on himself.
Whincup keeps bringing it on himself, whether he's changing his story, or blaming commentators. Red Bull really needs to discipline this guy. You wouldn't think he was in his 30's with the way he's carrying on.
 
That's what really peeved me off. He's basically blamed all the industry experts (and Skaife, whom was interviewing him) for his "villain" tag despite it being himself that did it.
Like I said, a bright future in the Liberal Party awaits. Have you seen any of Peter Dutton's press conferences? Blaming the media is his favourite way of avoiding accountability.
 
They should do a top 10 shootout every race just because it's awesome.
Every meeting should be two races of 250km.

Each race should have its own qualifying session and top-ten shootout, with one session on the hard tyres and the other on the soft (and the drivers allowed to choose when they use each).

The top-ten shootout for the Endurance Cup should be based on aggregate times, with both drivers doing a qualifying session and their times added together.

Adelaide should be part of the Endurance Cup, with one 500km race; likewise, the Gold Coast 600 should be one race. There should also be an Endurance Cup race in New Zealand to go with a Super Sprint. And get rid of the International Super Sprint format.

What would be truly amazing is an international touring car festival, with V8 Supercars, the BTCC, SuperGT, DTM and WTCC all racing at the one circuit over the course of a week. But it would be too expensive.
 
What would be truly amazing is an international touring car festival, with V8 Supercars, the BTCC, SuperGT, DTM and WTCC all racing at the one circuit over the course of a week. But it would be too expensive.
Like the World Touring Car cup thing they had in the early 90s?


It would be practical if everyone was using same spec cars like they were with Super touring so each country can just bring their own car to the race.

but it wouldn't happen unless its Class one.
 
Whose bright idea was it to run a Formula 4 race on the Gold Coast? I mean, junior drivers in glorified go-karts on a brutal street circuit was never going to end well.

Like the World Touring Car cup thing they had in the early 90s?
Sort of, but they all have their own races, rather than competing against one another.
 
Heart in mouth on the Beach Straight in F4. Nearly ended in what would have been a monumental crash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back